High fidelity epigenetic inheritance: Information theoretic model predicts threshold filling of histone modifications post replication

Beyond the genetic code, there is another layer of information encoded as chemical modifications on histone proteins positioned along the DNA. Maintaining these modifications is crucial for survival and identity of cells. How the information encoded in the histone marks gets inherited, given that only half the parental nucleosomes are transferred to each daughter chromatin, is a puzzle. We address this problem using ideas from Information theory and understanding from recent biological experiments. Mapping the replication and reconstruction of modifications to equivalent problems in communication, we ask how well an enzyme-machinery can recover information, if they were ideal computing machines. Studying a parameter regime where realistic enzymes can function, our analysis predicts that, pragmatically, enzymes may implement a threshold$-k$ filling algorithm which derives from maximum a posteriori probability decoding. Simulations using our method produce modification patterns similar to what is observed in recent experiments.

[1]  William J. Stewart,et al.  Probability, Markov Chains, Queues, and Simulation: The Mathematical Basis of Performance Modeling , 2009 .

[2]  R. Padinhateeri,et al.  Irregular chromatin: packing density, fiber width and occurrence of heterogeneous clusters , 2018, bioRxiv.

[3]  Danny Reinberg,et al.  Molecular Signals of Epigenetic States , 2010, Science.

[4]  R. Kornberg Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. , 1974, Science.

[5]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[6]  Nir Friedman,et al.  High-Resolution Chromatin Dynamics during a Yeast Stress Response , 2015, Molecular cell.

[7]  Bernard Sklar,et al.  Digital communications : fundamentals and applications , 2020 .

[8]  Alan J Tackett,et al.  Long-distance combinatorial linkage between methylation and acetylation on histone H3 N termini , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jonathan D. Licht,et al.  Total kinetic analysis reveals how combinatorial methylation patterns are established on lysines 27 and 36 of histone H3 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[11]  Chengzu Long,et al.  Mo Xu Dependent Chromatin Assembly − Partitioning of Histone H 3H 4 Tetramers During DNA Replication , 2012 .

[12]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  The interplay of histone modifications – writers that read , 2015, EMBO reports.

[13]  Alain Verreault,et al.  Chromatin Challenges during DNA Replication and Repair , 2007, Cell.

[14]  L. Litwin,et al.  Error control coding , 2001 .

[15]  Upamanyu Madhow Fundamentals of Digital Communication: References , 2008 .

[16]  Di Zhang,et al.  Metabolic regulation of gene expression through histone acylations , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  S. Horvath,et al.  Global histone modification patterns predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence , 2005, Nature.

[18]  T. Kouzarides Chromatin Modifications and Their Function , 2007, Cell.

[19]  S. Elgin,et al.  Epigenetic Codes for Heterochromatin Formation and Silencing Rounding up the Usual Suspects , 2002, Cell.

[20]  C. Allis,et al.  Translating the Histone Code , 2001, Science.

[21]  R. Padinhateeri,et al.  Coupling of replisome movement with nucleosome dynamics can contribute to the parent–daughter information transfer , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  N. Francis,et al.  Inheritance of Histones H3 and H4 during DNA Replication In Vitro. , 2017, Cell reports.

[23]  R. Xu,et al.  A mechanism for preventing asymmetric histone segregation onto replicating DNA strands , 2018, Science.

[24]  Wolfgang Fischle,et al.  Binary switches and modification cassettes in histone biology and beyond , 2003, Nature.

[25]  J. Hasenauer,et al.  Domain Model Explains Propagation Dynamics and Stability of Histone H3K27 and H3K36 Methylation Landscapes. , 2020, Cell reports.

[26]  Ole N Jensen,et al.  Two distinct modes for propagation of histone PTMs across the cell cycle , 2015, Genes & development.

[27]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[28]  O. Rando,et al.  Global patterns of histone modifications. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Chromatin structure and the inheritance of epigenetic information , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Chromatin domains rich in inheritance , 2018, Science.

[31]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Active and Repressed Chromatin Domains Exhibit Distinct Nucleosome Segregation during DNA Replication , 2019, Cell.

[32]  C. Allis,et al.  Epigenetics: A Landscape Takes Shape , 2007, Cell.

[33]  C. Allis,et al.  Beyond the double helix: writing and reading the histone code. , 2004, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[34]  R. Andersson,et al.  MCM2 promotes symmetric inheritance of modified histones during DNA replication , 2018, Science.

[35]  A. Probst,et al.  Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  H. Madhani,et al.  Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[37]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Regulation of nucleosome dynamics by histone modifications , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[38]  Anja Groth,et al.  Accurate Recycling of Parental Histones Reproduces the Histone Modification Landscape during DNA Replication , 2018, Molecular cell.

[39]  V. Corces,et al.  Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[41]  E. Furlong,et al.  Chromatin topology, condensates and gene regulation: shifting paradigms or just a phase? , 2019, Development.