Low-level noise affects balance control differently when applied at different body parts.

The main purpose of this study was to determine which body part is the best position to apply noise at so that balance control can be improved most. Twelve young healthy participants were recruited in this study. Balance control was assessed by center of pressure (COP) measures, which were collected when participants were blindfolded and stood upright quietly on a force platform. Low-level mechanical noise was separately applied at seven body parts during quiet upright stance, including the forehead, neck, shoulder, finger, abdomen, knee, and ankle. Results showed that dependent COP measures as a whole were not improved when noise was at the finger, shoulder, abdomen, knee, and ankle. In contrast, with the application of noise at the forehead and neck, the dependent COP measures as a whole significantly changed. The forehead appeared to be the better position at which noise should be applied, since the ANOVAs revealed that body sway significantly decreased with the application of noise at the forehead. Findings from this study can aid in the development of noise-based intervention strategies aimed at improving balance. A possible intervention solution might be embedding noise-based devices into head belt.

[1]  P Rougier,et al.  Automatic determination of the transition between successive control mechanisms in upright stance assessed by modelling of the centre of pressure. , 1999, Archives of physiology and biochemistry.

[2]  Attila Priplata,et al.  Noise-enhanced human balance control. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[3]  J. Lackner,et al.  Fingertip contact influences human postural control , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J. Collins,et al.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: A random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  E Zaloshnja,et al.  Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[6]  T.E. Prieto,et al.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  L. Nashner Analysis of Stance Posture in Humans , 1981 .

[8]  J. J. Collins,et al.  Enhancing human balance control with galvanic vestibular stimulation , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The effect of age-related declines in proprioception and total knee replacement on postural control. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  J. Collins,et al.  Noise-enhanced balance control in older adults , 2002, Neuroreport.

[11]  B. Guschlbauer,et al.  The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia , 1984, Brain Research.

[12]  H Hsiao,et al.  Preventing falls from roofs: a critical review , 2001, Ergonomics.

[13]  Mark W. Rogers,et al.  Passive tactile sensory input improves stability during standing , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  F B Horak,et al.  Fingertip touch improves postural stability in patients with peripheral neuropathy. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[15]  B. Maki,et al.  Aging and Postural Control , 1990, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  James A. Norris,et al.  Ability of static and statistical mechanics posturographic measures to distinguish between age and fall risk. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Lackner,et al.  Auditory cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and congenitally blind people , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Effects of different types of light touch on postural sway , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.