Optimum wind- and photovoltaic-based stand-alone systems on the basis of life cycle energy analysis

The main aim of the specific research is the comparison of the energy pay-back period of optimum renewable energy sources (RES)-based configurations, meaning wind-battery and photovoltaic-battery stand-alone installations that may ensure the energy autonomy of a typical remote consumer under the condition of minimum life cycle (LC) energy content. In this context, energy autonomy is first ensured on the basis of an appropriate sizing methodology, while accordingly, by developing a calculation algorithm for the estimation of the LC energy content of such energy autonomous systems, minimum LC embodied energy configurations are eventually obtained. On top of that, three representative areas are examined so as to investigate the influence of the local wind and solar potential. According to the results, the sustainable character of both RES-based solutions is designated, especially when comparison with the conventional diesel-engine solution is carried out. On the other hand, the situation is inversed when comparing stand-alone and grid-connected RES systems of the same size, with significant contribution of the battery storage component being reflected.

[1]  S. Pellegrini,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine , 2009 .

[2]  M. J. de Wild Scholten,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaics: update of ecoinvent data V2.0 , 2008 .

[3]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Photovoltaic Life Cycles , 2012 .

[4]  Ismat Nawaz,et al.  Embodied energy analysis of photovoltaic (PV) system based on macro- and micro- level , 2006 .

[5]  J. Baker New technology and possible advances in energy storage , 2008 .

[6]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey , 2014 .

[7]  Begoña Guezuraga,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines , 2012 .

[8]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications , 2002 .

[9]  Eric Hu,et al.  Life cycle assessment and evaluation of energy payback time on high-concentration photovoltaic power generation system , 2010 .

[10]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Producer Responsibility and Recycling Solar Photovoltaic Modules , 2010 .

[11]  J. K. Kaldellis,et al.  Energy pay-back period analysis of stand-alone photovoltaic systems , 2010 .

[12]  Aloísio Leoni Schmid,et al.  Replacing diesel by solar in the Amazon: short-term economic feasibility of PV-diesel hybrid systems , 2004 .

[13]  Liselotte Schleisner,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities , 2000 .

[14]  John K. Kaldellis,et al.  Optimum autonomous stand-alone photovoltaic system design on the basis of energy pay-back analysis , 2009 .

[15]  Marwan M. Mahmoud,et al.  Techno-economic feasibility of energy supply of remote villages in Palestine by PV-systems, diesel generators and electric grid , 2006 .

[16]  Bryce S. Richards,et al.  Permanently dispelling a myth of photovoltaics via the adoption of a new net energy indicator , 2007 .

[17]  M. Watt,et al.  Life‐cycle air emissions from PV power systems , 1998 .

[18]  Peter Hall,et al.  Energy-storage technologies and electricity generation , 2008 .

[19]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Wind turbines in Brazil and Germany: an example of geographical variability in life-cycle assessment , 2004 .

[20]  Anna Stoppato,et al.  Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation , 2008 .

[21]  Himangshu Ranjan Ghosh,et al.  A wind–PV-battery hybrid power system at Sitakunda in Bangladesh , 2009 .

[22]  Manuel Castro,et al.  Energy payback time of grid connected PV systems: Comparison between tracking and fixed systems , 2009 .

[23]  K. A. Kavadias,et al.  Cost–benefit analysis of remote hybrid wind–diesel power stations: Case study Aegean Sea islands , 2007 .

[24]  Francis Meunier,et al.  Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines , 2009 .

[25]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment and energy pay-back time of advanced photovoltaic modules : CdTe and CIS compared to poly-Si , 2007 .

[26]  John K. Kaldellis,et al.  Minimum cost solution of wind–photovoltaic based stand-alone power systems for remote consumers , 2012 .

[27]  John K. Kaldellis,et al.  Comparing wind and photovoltaic stand-alone power systems used for the electrification of remote consumers , 2007 .

[28]  E. A. Alsema,et al.  THE REAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CRYSTALLINE SILICON PV MODULES: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON UP-TO-DATE MANUFACTURERS DATA , 2005 .

[29]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield , 2009 .

[30]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review , 2010 .

[31]  E. Alsema,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Production , 2005 .

[32]  Peilin Zhou,et al.  A comparative study on life cycle analysis of molten carbon fuel cells and diesel engines for marine application , 2006 .

[33]  Santanu Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Optimum sizing of wind-battery systems incorporating resource uncertainty , 2010 .

[34]  John K. Kaldellis,et al.  Optimum autonomous wind–power system sizing for remote consumers, using long-term wind speed data , 2002 .

[35]  Evert Nieuwlaar,et al.  Energy viability of photovoltaic systems , 2000 .

[36]  E. Alsema,et al.  Photovoltaics energy payback times, greenhouse gas emissions and external costs: 2004–early 2005 status , 2006 .

[37]  C. Rydh,et al.  Energy analysis of batteries in photovoltaic systems. Part I: Performance and energy requirements , 2005 .