Role of a conserved lysine residue in the peripheral cannabinoid receptor (CB2): evidence for subtype specificity.

The human cannabinoid receptors, central cannabinoid receptor (CB1) and peripheral cannabinoid receptor (CB2), share only 44% amino acid identity overall, yet most ligands do not discriminate between receptor subtypes. Site-directed mutagenesis was employed as a means of mapping the ligand recognition site for the human CB2 cannabinoid receptor. A lysine residue in the third transmembrane domain of the CB2 receptor (K109), which is conserved between the CB1 and CB2 receptors, was mutated to alanine or arginine to determine the role of this charged amino acid in receptor function. The analogous mutation in the CB1 receptor (K192A) was found to be crucial for recognition of several cannabinoid compounds excluding (R)-(+)-[2, 3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1, 4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthalenyl)methanone (WIN 55,212-2). In contrast, in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells expressing the mutant or wild-type CB2 receptors, we found no significant differences in either the binding profile of several cannabinoid ligands nor in inhibition of cAMP accumulation. We identified a high-affinity site for (-)-3-[2-hydroxyl-4-(1, 1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-[3-hydroxyl propyl] cyclohexan-1-ol (CP-55,940) in the region of helices 3, 6, and 7, with S3.31(112), T3.35(116), and N7.49(295) in the K109A mutant using molecular modeling. The serine residue, unique to the CB2 receptor, was then mutated to glycine in the K109A mutant. This double mutant, K109AS112G, retains the ability to bind aminoalkylindoles but loses affinity for classical cannabinoids, as predicted by the molecular model. Distinct cellular localization of the mutant receptors observed with immunofluorescence also suggests differences in receptor function. In summary, we identified amino acid residues in the CB2 receptor that could lead to subtype specificity.

[1]  K. Mackie,et al.  Cannabinoids inhibit N-type calcium channels in neuroblastoma-glioma cells. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Johnson,et al.  Pharmacological profile of a series of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs: classification as cannabimimetic agents. , 1992, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[3]  T. Bonner,et al.  Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA , 1990, Nature.

[4]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Construction of a 3D model of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor: determination of helix ends and helix orientation. , 1995, Life sciences.

[5]  G. Cabral,et al.  High-level expression of the human CB2 cannabinoid receptor using a baculovirus system. , 1998, Biochemical pharmacology.

[6]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices , 1997, Nature.

[7]  H. Rosenthal A graphic method for the determination and presentation of binding parameters in a complex system. , 1967, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane alpha-helices. , 1997, Nature.

[9]  G. Scatchard,et al.  THE ATTRACTIONS OF PROTEINS FOR SMALL MOLECULES AND IONS , 1949 .

[10]  Pascual Ferrara,et al.  Structural Features of the Central Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Involved in the Binding of the Specific CB1 Antagonist SR 141716A (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  D. R. Compton,et al.  Evaluation of binding in a transfected cell line expressing a peripheral cannabinoid receptor (CB2): identification of cannabinoid receptor subtype selective ligands. , 1996, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[12]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[13]  T. Bonner,et al.  A lysine residue of the cannabinoid receptor is critical for receptor recognition by several agonists but not WIN55212-2. , 1996, Molecular pharmacology.

[14]  G. O'neill,et al.  Activation of the human peripheral cannabinoid receptor results in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.

[15]  K. Mackie,et al.  Comparison of the pharmacology and signal transduction of the human cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.

[16]  A. Makriyannis,et al.  The Conformational Properties of the Highly Selective Cannabinoid Receptor Ligand CP-55,940 (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  A. Howlett,et al.  Cannabinoid inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Pharmacology of the response in neuroblastoma cell membranes. , 1984, Molecular pharmacology.

[18]  M. Abood,et al.  Mutation of a highly conserved aspartate residue in the second transmembrane domain of the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, disrupts G-protein coupling. , 1998, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[19]  K. Mackie,et al.  Anandamide, an endogenous cannabimimetic eicosanoid, binds to the cloned human cannabinoid receptor and stimulates receptor-mediated signal transduction. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. Munro,et al.  Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids , 1993, Nature.

[21]  W. A. Hill,et al.  Classical/non-classical cannabinoid hybrids; stereochemical requirements for the southern hydroxyalkyl chain. , 1995, Life sciences.

[22]  K. Mackie,et al.  Cannabinoids activate an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance and inhibit Q-type calcium currents in AtT20 cells transfected with rat brain cannabinoid receptor , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. , 1973, Biochemical pharmacology.

[24]  D. R. Compton,et al.  Synthesis and pharmacology of a very potent cannabinoid lacking a phenolic hydroxyl with high affinity for the CB2 receptor. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  D. Kendall,et al.  Ligand Binding and Modulation of Cyclic AMP Levels Depend on the Chemical Nature of Residue 192 of the Human Cannabinoid Receptor 1 , 1998, Journal of neurochemistry.