The Emergence of “Us and Them” in 80 Lines of Code

Psychological explanations of group genesis often require population heterogeneity in identity or other characteristics, whether deep (e.g., religion) or superficial (e.g., eye color). We used agent-based models to explore group genesis in homogeneous populations and found robust group formation with just two basic principles: reciprocity and transitivity. These emergent groups demonstrated in-group cooperation and out-group defection, even though agents lacked common identity. Group formation increased individual payoffs, and group number and size were robust to varying levels of reciprocity and transitivity. Increasing population size increased group size more than group number, and manipulating baseline trust in a population had predictable effects on group genesis. An interactive demonstration of the parameter space and source code for implementing the model are available online.

[1]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[2]  J. Davis Structural Balance, Mechanical Solidarity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[4]  J. Lawrence Angel,et al.  Population Distances: Biological, Linguistic, Geographical, and Environmental [and Comments and Reply] , 1966, Current Anthropology.

[5]  T. Schelling Models of Segregation , 1969 .

[6]  J. Davis Clustering and Hierarchy in Interpersonal Relations: Testing Two Graph Theoretical Models on 742 Sociomatrices , 1970 .

[7]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[8]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[9]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[10]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[11]  P. Holland,et al.  TRANSITIVITY IN STRUCTURAL MODELS OF SMALL GROUPS , 1977 .

[12]  M. Moore,et al.  An international application of Heider's balance theory , 1978 .

[13]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[14]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[15]  G. Wilkinson Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat , 1984, Nature.

[16]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior , 1985 .

[17]  S. Kalick,et al.  The Matching Hypothesis Reexamined , 1986 .

[18]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[19]  M. Krohn,et al.  Role overlap, network multiplexity, and adolescent deviant behavior , 1988 .

[20]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[21]  M. Nowak,et al.  Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations , 1992, Nature.

[22]  Linda Simon,et al.  The effects of mortality salience on intergroup bias between minimal groups , 1996 .

[23]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Intergroup bias: status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Social Cognition: Making Sense of People , 1999 .

[25]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Locomotion in social dilemmas: How we adapt to cooperative, Tit-For-Tat, and noncooperative partners. , 1999 .

[26]  Hugh Louch,et al.  Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[27]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[28]  P. V. van Lange,et al.  How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: the benefits of generosity. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[31]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  The Dynamical Perspective in Personality and Social Psychology , 2002 .

[33]  David V. Pynadath,et al.  PsychSim: Agent-based Modeling of Social Interactions and Influence , 2004, ICCM.

[34]  T. Getty,et al.  Cooperative nest defence in red–winged blackbirds: reciprocal altruism, kinship or by–product mutualism? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  BÓ Pedrodal,et al.  Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future : Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games , 2005 .

[36]  R. Trivers Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later , 2006 .

[37]  M. Morris,et al.  Do People Mix at Mixers? Structure, Homophily, and the “Life of the Party” , 2007 .

[38]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[39]  E. Fehr,et al.  The Coevolution of Cultural Groups and Ingroup Favoritism , 2008, Science.

[40]  G. Schino,et al.  Reciprocal Altruism in Primates: Partner Choice, Cognition, and Emotions , 2009 .

[41]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Tore Opsahl,et al.  Clustering in weighted networks , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[43]  G. Schino,et al.  Chapter 2 Reciprocal Altruism in Primates , 2009 .

[44]  David G. Rand,et al.  Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World , 2010 .

[45]  Kevin Lewis,et al.  Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Cooperation and assortativity with dynamic partner updating , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  David G. Rand,et al.  Direct reciprocity in structured populations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Networks and Cooperation in Hunter-Gatherers , 2011, Nature.

[50]  Kurt Gray,et al.  Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality , 2012, Psychological inquiry.

[51]  David G. Rand,et al.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment , 2013 .

[54]  M. Brewer 25 Years Toward a Multilevel Science , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[55]  C. D. De Dreu Human Cooperation , 2013, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[56]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.