Creating the technopolis: High-technology development in Austin, Texas☆

Abstract New institutional alliances, driven by the rapid increase in and diversity of new technologies, are altering the strategy and tactics of economic development. As a result, communities across the world are seeking to create modern technopoleis or city-states that interactively link technology commercialization with public and private sectors to spur economic growth and diversification through high-technology company development. This paper develops the conceptual framework of a technopolis wheel from studying the dynamics of high-technology development and economic growth in Austin, Texas. It describes seven segments within the technopolis: the university, large technology companies, small technology companies, federal government, state government, local government and support groups. Empirical data, based on surveys, interviews, and archival sources, are presented to assess the role and impact of each segment on the emerging Austin technopolis. Analysis of this data demonstrates the role of the research university on spin-out company formation, the direct and indirect impacts of federal, state, and local government, the evolution of high-technology companies over time with a focus on major company relocations or foundings, and the establishment of indigenous high-technology companies. A case study of Tracor, Inc., the only home-grown, Fortune 500 company headquartered in Austin, demonstrates some of the key factors at work in the technopolis wheel. The paper points to new institutional relationships among the segments of the technopolis wheel. It emphasizes the role of influencers who provide leadership in each segment while networking the different segments to form new institutional alliances. Key findings of the study include the pivotal role of the research university, the need for continuity in governmental policies, the catalytic role of large technology companies, the importance of indigenous company development, and the need for consensus for the sustained development of the technopolis. Three important themes emerge in technopolis development, not only in the United States but also in Europe and Asia: the need for a coordinated approach to high-technology company development, the presence of a high-quality research university, and the importance of a network of influencers or “executive champions.” By focusing on the interaction among the seven segments of the technopolis wheel, we provide a conceptual framework for assessing the relative importance of government, academic, business, and public sectors in the high-technology economic development of a region.

[1]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[2]  A. Cooper The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms , 1985 .

[3]  M. Castells The economic crisis and American society , 1980 .

[4]  William D. Bygrave,et al.  Venture capital's role in financing innovation for economic growth , 1986 .

[5]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  New firms: Societal contribution versus survival potential , 1987 .

[6]  Richard B. Robinson,et al.  Emerging strategies in the venture capital industry , 1987 .

[7]  R. Kanter Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies , 1985 .

[8]  S. Birley The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process , 1985 .

[9]  Charles L. Ceven Modeling the multiregional economic system: F. Gerard Adams and Norman J. Glickman, Eds., Lexington, Mass., D.C. Heath: 1980, pp. ix + 310 , 1982 .

[10]  David A. Walker,et al.  The role of venture capital in financing small business , 1987 .

[11]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  Financing and Managing Fast-Growth Companies: The Venture Capital Process , 1985 .

[12]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  The M-Form Society: How American Teamwork Can Recapture the Competitive Edge , 1984 .

[13]  David N. Allen,et al.  Nurturing Advanced Technology Enterprises: Emerging Issues in State and Local Economic Development Policy , 1986 .

[14]  Mancur Olson,et al.  The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. , 1983 .

[15]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .

[16]  William E. Wetzel,et al.  The informal venture capital market: Aspects of scale and market efficiency , 1987 .

[17]  Robert B. Reich,et al.  The Next American Frontier , 1984 .

[18]  C. Schelling,et al.  Public-private partnership : new opportunities for meeting social needs , 1985 .

[19]  B. Little Science parks and innovation centers: Their economic and social impact: Editor: J.M. Gibb Publisher: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1986. , 1988 .

[20]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  Creating the Technopolis: Linking Technology Commercialization and Economic Development , 1988 .

[21]  D. Merrifield,et al.  New business incubators , 1987 .

[22]  Jérôme Doutriaux,et al.  Growth pattern of academic entrepreneurial firms , 1987 .

[23]  Raymond W. Smilor,et al.  The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship , 1986 .