Towards High‐Throughput Production of Uniformly Encoded Microparticles

Spherical particles conjugated to molecules with affinity for, or able to interact with, an analyte are one of the most convenient tools for parallel multiplex analysis in research and diagnosis. Identification of the different analytes is based on the signal associated to the marker particles, whose size or color is specific. For high-throughput applications, dye-labeled fluorescent microspheres have emerged as a very important alternative to traditional microarrays. They present the possibility of multiplex color detection and are expected to be more flexible in target selection, faster in binding, and less expensive in production, using very small sample volumes with a three-dimensional (3D) configuration. Another advantage of fluorescent microparticle arrays is the possibility of using flow cytometry as a powerful, well-established, fast, sensitive, and accurate detection technique of biomolecular interaction, particularly relevant in very recent cancer-diagnosis findings. The functionality of microbead-based arrays relies heavily on the properties of the microspheres, e.g., their size range, stability, uniformity, and ability to retain the fluorescent dye. Despite all of the efforts aimed at the preparation of labeled, functionalized polymeric beads, a considerable challenge still remains, namely, how to develop and optimize simple methods for the preparation of huge quantities of fluorescently encoded microparticles for demanding applications (e.g., > 10 particles per day and device) with a uniform shape and surface, homogeneous size distribution, and controlled fluorescence properties. Numerous strategies and processes have been developed to produce polymeric microparticles; the determinant step being the drop formation, which fixes the size distribution of the resulting microparticles. Depending on the physical properties of the fluids, different techniques or mechanisms are used to produce monodisperse drops. The first straightforward strategy is the formation of a single drop at a time, as in dripping processes, emulsification membranes, or microfluidic emulsification. Notwithstanding the very uniform microparticles obtained with these techniques, the drop-production rate is very low and the drop diameter scales with the diameter of the capillary or the pore, which makes it difficult to produce microparticles of a few micrometers or less. The second strategy is the formation of numerous drops at a time, as in mixing or stirring processes, with scarce size predictability and homogeneity, or jet-disintegration techniques, in which a wide range of drop sizes is obtained, with different distributions depending on the Reynolds and Weber numbers of the jet. In particular, in laminar-jet disintegration or Rayleigh breakup, the jet breaks up into uniform droplets due to capillary instability. Nevertheless, under real conditions, formation of satellite drops between the main drops, drop coalescence, and the presence of natural disturbances on the jet surface induce wide drop size distributions. On the other hand, monodisperse drops, and consequently monodisperse microparticles, were produced recently using oscillatory stimulation to break the jet up. An acoustic transducer induced a horizontal oscillation at the optimal wavelength, stimulating the fastest growth mode in order to break the jet up into a chain of perfectly monodisperse drops. Despite the perfect control of the size distribution of the droplets, the drop size is determined by the diameter of the nozzle, as the jet diameter scales with the orifice nozzle. Therefore, the production of small microparticles (less than 25 lm in diameter) becomes impossible as the risk of orifice clogging increases with narrow diameter nozzles. Here, we report a versatile and controlled procedure for the production of microparticles, with diameters smaller than 25 lm (typically 5 lm), yielding remarkable size accuracy, with a small size dispersion as well as allowing the selection of surface topology and internal composition. To produce such microparticles, we combined flow-focusing technology in a unique parametrical range, where high productivity and size control are preserved (high Reynolds and moderate/high Weber numbers), with a solvent evaporation/extraction proceC O M M U N IC A IO N S

[1]  P. Bryant,et al.  A multiplex microsphere bead assay for comparative RNA expression analysis using flow cytometry. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[2]  M. Ashokkumar,et al.  Sonochemical production of fluorescent and phosphorescent latex particles. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Kathryn L Kellar,et al.  Multiplexed microsphere-based flow cytometric assays. , 2002, Experimental hematology.

[4]  D. Peritt,et al.  A novel monoclonal antibody screening method using the Luminex-100 microsphere system. , 2002, Journal of immunological methods.

[5]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Generation of monodisperse particles by using microfluidics: control over size, shape, and composition. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  Dieter Stoll,et al.  Miniaturised multiplexed immunoassays. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[7]  B. Amsden,et al.  The Production of Uniformly Sized Polymer Microspheres , 1999, Pharmaceutical Research.

[8]  Mary B Meza,et al.  Bead-based HTS applications in drug discovery , 2000 .

[9]  D W Pack,et al.  Fabrication of PLG microspheres with precisely controlled and monodisperse size distributions. , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[10]  J. Treadway,et al.  Multiplexed SNP genotyping using the Qbead system: a quantum dot-encoded microsphere-based assay. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  O'donnell,et al.  Preparation of microspheres by the solvent evaporation technique. , 1997, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[12]  S. Sosnowski,et al.  Dye distribution in fluorescent‐labeled latex prepared by emulsion polymerization , 1994 .

[13]  Minoru Seki,et al.  Interfacial Tension Driven Monodispersed Droplet Formation from Microfabricated Channel Array , 2001 .

[14]  S. Sugiura,et al.  Preparation characteristics of water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsions using microchannel emulsification. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  S. Tomotika On the Instability of a Cylindrical Thread of a Viscous Liquid Surrounded by Another Viscous Fluid , 1935 .

[16]  H. Fessi,et al.  The membrane emulsification process: a review , 2004 .

[17]  L. Rayleigh On The Instability Of Jets , 1878 .

[18]  B. Vincent,et al.  Distribution of CdSe quantum dots within swollen polystyrene microgel particles using confocal microscopy. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[19]  S. Nie,et al.  Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Sebastián Chávez,et al.  Flow Focusing: a versatile technology to produce size-controlled and specific-morphology microparticles. , 2005, Small.

[21]  M. Nagai,et al.  Preparation of uniform poly(lactide) microspheres by employing the Shirasu Porous Glass (SPG) emulsification technique , 1999 .

[22]  Seung-Man Yang,et al.  Monodisperse Micrometer‐Scale Spherical Assemblies of Polymer Particles , 2002 .

[23]  T Davies,et al.  Classification and properties of 64 multiplexed microsphere sets. , 1998, Cytometry.

[24]  S. Nie,et al.  Luminescent quantum dots for multiplexed biological detection and imaging. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[25]  Alfonso M. Gañán-Calvo,et al.  Generation of Steady Liquid Microthreads and Micron-Sized Monodisperse Sprays in Gas Streams , 1998 .

[26]  F. Caruso,et al.  Layer-by-Layer Construction of Novel Biofunctional Fluorescent Microparticles for Immunoassay Applications. , 2001, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[27]  Gwendolyn A. Lawrie,et al.  Optical encoding of microbeads for gene screening: alternatives to microarrays , 2001 .

[28]  D. Weitz,et al.  Monodisperse Double Emulsions Generated from a Microcapillary Device , 2005, Science.

[29]  E. Kumacheva,et al.  Continuous microfluidic reactors for polymer particles. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  H. Stone,et al.  Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels , 2003 .

[31]  A. Gañán-Calvo,et al.  Perfectly monodisperse microbubbling by capillary flow focusing. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[32]  S. Omi Preparation of monodisperse microspheres using the Shirasu porous glass emulsification technique , 1996 .

[33]  H. Horvitz,et al.  MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers , 2005, Nature.

[34]  H. Sah Microencapsulation techniques using ethyl acetate as a dispersed solvent: effects of its extraction rate on the characteristics of PLGA microspheres , 1997 .

[35]  J M Irache,et al.  Loading of plasmid DNA into PLGA microparticles using TROMS (Total Recirculation One-Machine System): evaluation of its integrity and controlled release properties. , 2003, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[36]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  An Axisymmetric Flow‐Focusing Microfluidic Device , 2005 .

[37]  Alfonso M. Gañán-Calvo,et al.  A novel pneumatic technique to generate steady capillary microjets , 1999 .

[38]  Mitsutoshi Nakajima,et al.  The generation of highly monodisperse droplets through the breakup of hydrodynamically focused microthread in a microfluidic device , 2004 .

[39]  Igor Nabiev,et al.  Functionalized nanocrystal-tagged fluorescent polymer beads: synthesis, physicochemical characterization, and immunolabeling application. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[40]  Hans P Merkle,et al.  Microencapsulation by solvent extraction/evaporation: reviewing the state of the art of microsphere preparation process technology. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[41]  C. Kinoshita,et al.  Prediction of droplet size from the breakup of cylindrical liquid jets , 1995 .