Voice and aspiration: Evidence from Russian, Hungarian, German, Swedish, and Turkish

Abstract The purpose of this article is to investigate a variety of languages with laryngeal contrasts that have usually been characterized in the literature of generative phonology as having a two-way [voice] contrast and to show that by adopting a narrower interpretation of [voice] to cover only those languages which exhibit prevoicing in word-initial stops, a better understanding of the laryngeal contrasts and assimilation of laryngeal features in these languages is possible. We consider Hungarian, Russian, German, Swedish, and Turkish, which have all been analyzed as having a two-way [voice] contrast for stops. We suggest that the feature [voice] is indeed appropriate for Hungarian and Russian, that the feature of contrast in German is [spread] and that, in Swedish and Turkish, both [voice] and [spread] occur in underlying forms. Analyses are provided for these stop systems in the framework of Optimality Theory.

[1]  Gregory K. Iverson,et al.  Legacy Specification in the Laryngeal Phonology of Dutch , 2003, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[2]  M. Kenstowicz,et al.  Two notes on laryngeal licensing , 2003 .

[3]  S. Davis,et al.  The distribution of aspirated stops and /h/ in American English and Korean: an alignment approach with typological implications , 2003 .

[4]  D. Wissing,et al.  Distinctive [voice] implies regressive voicing assimilation , 2001 .

[5]  Alan Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology : constraint interaction and satisfaction , 1993 .

[6]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[7]  Joan Mascaró,et al.  The Typology of Voicing and Devoicing , 2001 .

[8]  William J. Idsardi,et al.  Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement , 2000 .

[9]  G. K. Iverson,et al.  Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic , 1995, Phonology.

[10]  J. Ohala.  The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[11]  S. Nooteboom,et al.  A search for a word‐beginning superiority effect , 1988 .

[12]  Shosuke Haraguchi,et al.  The phonology-phonetics interface and Syllabic Theory , 2003 .

[13]  L. Lombardi.  Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Why Place and Voice Are Different: Constraint-Specific Alternations in Optimality Theory , 2001 .

[14]  Rachel Walker,et al.  Weak Triggers in Vowel Harmony , 2005 .

[15]  A. Cohn.  Nasalisation in English: phonology or phonetics , 1993, Phonology.

[16]  M. Jessen.  Phonetic implementation of the distinctive auditory features [voice] and [tense] in stop consonants , 2001 .

[17]  J. Westbury.  Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Eric Bakovic.  Assimilation to the unmarked , 1999 .

[19]  Joe Pater.  The prosody-morphology interface: Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects , 1999 .

[20]  Michael Jessen,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German , 1999 .

[21]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[22]  P. Keating.  PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF STOP CONSONANT VOICING , 1984 .

[23]  Sharon Inkelas,et al.  The consequences of Optimization for Underspecification , 1994 .

[24]  M. Oostendorp.  Towards a Quantitative Analysis of Fricative Voicing , 2003 .

[25]  Pétur Helgason,et al.  Preaspiration in the Nordic languages : synchronic and diachronic aspects , 2002 .

[26]  P. Keating,et al.  On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing , 1986, Journal of Linguistics.

[27]  Bert Vaux,et al.  The Laryngeal Specifications of Fricatives , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[28]  Jill Beckman.  Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony , 1997, Phonology.

[29]  A. Salasoo,et al.  Interaction of Knowledge Sources in Spoken Word Identification. , 1985, Journal of memory and language.

[30]  Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al.  Lexical retrieval from fragments of spoken words: beginnings vs endings , 1981 .

[31]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Phonological factors in lexical access: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task , 1988 .

[32]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[33]  Jerzy Rubach.  Polish voice assimilation in optimality theory: 1859 , 1997 .

[34]  John M. Anderson,et al.  Principles of Dependency Phonology , 1987 .

[35]  Milwaukee,et al.  Glottal spreading bias in Germanic , 1999 .

[36]  Pétur Helgason,et al.  Distinctive (voice) does not Imply Regressive Assimilation: Evidence from Swedish , 2004 .

[37]  L. Lombardi.  Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization , 1997 .

[38]  Jerzy Rubach,et al.  Nonsyllabic analysis of voice assimilation in polish , 1996 .

[39]  /v/ and Voice Assimilation in Hungarian and Russian , 2004 .

[40]  Catherine Ringen,et al.  Laryngeal features in German , 2002, Phonology.

[41]  Catherine O. Ringen.  Cross-linguistic differences and similarities in stop voicing , 2004 .

[42]  A. Kaun,et al.  The Typology of Rounding Harmony: An Optimality Theoretic Approach , 1995 .

[43]  Ekaterina L. Zubritskaya.  The categorical and variable phonology of Russian , 1995 .

[44]  Linda Lombardi,et al.  Positional Faithfulness and Voicing Assimilation in Optimality Theory , 2008 .