The Statistical Analysis of Multi-Voxel Patterns in Functional Imaging

The goal of multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) in BOLD imaging is to determine whether patterns of activation across multiple voxels change with experimental conditions. MVPA is a powerful technique, its use is rapidly growing, but it poses serious statistical challenges. For instance, it is well-known that the slow nature of the BOLD response can lead to greatly exaggerated performance estimates. Methods are available to avoid this overestimation, and we present those here in tutorial fashion. We go on to show that, even with these methods, standard tests of significance such as Students’ T and the binomial tests are invalid in typical MRI experiments. Only a carefully constructed permutation test correctly assesses statistical significance. Furthermore, our simulations show that performance estimates increase with both temporal as well as spatial signal correlations among multiple voxels. This dependence implies that a comparison of MVPA performance between areas, between subjects, or even between BOLD signals that have been preprocessed in different ways needs great care.

[1]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[3]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[4]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Revealing representational content with pattern-information fMRI--an introductory guide. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[5]  Polina Golland,et al.  Permutation Tests for Classification: Towards Statistical Significance in Image-Based Studies , 2003, IPMI.

[6]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[7]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding Seen and Attended Motion Directions from Activity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[8]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  The impact of temporal compression and space selection on SVM analysis of single-subject and multi-subject fMRI data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[10]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  How does an fMRI voxel sample the neuronal activity pattern: Compact-kernel or complex spatiotemporal filter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[14]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[15]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Is cortical vasculature functionally organized? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[18]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[19]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.