A risk assessment approach to improve the resilience of a seaport system using Bayesian networks

Over the years, many efforts have been focused on developing methods to design seaport systems, yet disruption still occur because of various human, technical and random natural events. Much of the available data to design these systems are highly uncertain and difficult to obtain due to the number of events with vague and imprecise parameters that need to be modelled. A systematic approach that handles both quantitative and qualitative data, as well as means of updating existing information when new knowledge becomes available is required. Resilience, which is the ability of complex systems to recover quickly after severe disruptions, has been recognised as an important characteristic of maritime operations. This paper presents a modelling approach that employs Bayesian belief networks to model various influencing variables in a seaport system. The use of Bayesian belief networks allows the influencing variables to be represented in a hierarchical structure for collaborative design and modelling of the system. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is utilised to evaluate the relative influence of each influencing variable. It is envisaged that the proposed methodology could provide safety analysts with a flexible tool to implement strategies that would contribute to the resilience of maritime systems.

[1]  Mayada Omer,et al.  A cognitive process architecture framework for secure and resilient seaport operations , 2011 .

[2]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Fusion, Propagation, and Structuring in Belief Networks , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Jeroen Keppens,et al.  Linguistic Bayesian Networks for reasoning with subjective probabilities in forensic statistics , 2003, ICAIL.

[4]  A. G. Eleye-Datubo,et al.  Marine and Offshore Safety Assessment by Incorporative Risk Modeling in a Fuzzy‐Bayesian Network of an Induced Mass Assignment Paradigm , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Wolfgang Kröger,et al.  Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Mehmet Emre Bayraktar,et al.  A decision support system for selecting the optimal contracting strategy in highway work zone projects , 2009 .

[7]  Roshanak Nilchiani,et al.  A policy making framework for resilient port infrastructure systems , 2010 .

[8]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  A proposed decision-making model for evaluating a container’s security score , 2014 .

[9]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[10]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Resilience Framework for Ports and Other Intermodal Components , 2010 .

[11]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  An offshore safety assessment framework using fuzzy reasoning and evidential synthesis approaches , 2005 .

[12]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Alf C. Zimmer,et al.  What Uncertainty Judgments Can Tell About the Underlying Subjective Probabilities , 1985, UAI.

[14]  Enrico Zio,et al.  An All-Hazard Approach for the Vulnerability Analysis of Critical Infrastructures , 2011 .

[15]  E. Dalziell,et al.  Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptive Capacity: Implications for System Performance , 2004 .

[16]  Jin Wang,et al.  Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  A seafarer’s reliability assessment incorporating subjective judgements , 2012 .

[18]  K. Bichou Security and Risk-Based Models in Shipping and Ports: Review and Critical Analysis , 2008 .

[19]  Bilal M Ayyub,et al.  Risk analysis for critical asset protection. , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Mayada Omer,et al.  A framework for assessing resiliency of maritime transportation systems , 2012 .

[21]  Jin Wang,et al.  An integrated fuzzy risk assessment for seaport operations , 2014 .

[22]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  A dynamic Bayesian network based framework to evaluate cascading effects in a power grid , 2012, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[23]  N.S.F. Abdul Rahman An Assessment of Global Factors towards the Financial Performance of a Containership Using a Bayesian Network Method , 2013 .

[24]  Stig Ole Johnsen,et al.  Risk assessment and resilience of critical communication infrastructure in railways , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[25]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[26]  Sunan Huang,et al.  Railway risk assessment - the fuzzy reasoning approach and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approaches: A case study of shunting at Waterloo depot , 2007 .

[27]  James B. Rice,et al.  Formal Vulnerability Assessment of a maritime transportation system , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Jin Wang,et al.  Fuzzy Rule-Based Bayesian Reasoning Approach for Prioritization of Failures in FMEA , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[29]  Morrison Handley-Schachler,et al.  Port risk management and public private partnerships: Factors relating to risk allocation and risk sustainability , 2010 .

[30]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[31]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  Bayesian reliability analysis for fuzzy lifetime data , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[32]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  A proposed methodology for assessing the reduction of a seafarer’s performance with insufficient recuperative rest , 2013 .

[33]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[34]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .