A Meta-Analysis of Different Forms of Shared Leadership–Team Performance Relations

Using 50 effect sizes from both published and unpublished studies (team n = 3,198), we provide meta-analytic support for the positive relationship between shared leadership and team performance. Employing a random effects model, we found that the theoretical foundation and associated measurement techniques used to index shared leadership significantly moderated effect size estimates. Specifically, as compared to studies that conceptualized and employed assessments of overall shared leadership from members (i.e., an aggregation approach), network conceptions and measures of shared leadership evidenced higher effect sizes. Both network density and (de)centralization approaches to the study of shared leadership–performance relations exhibited significant and higher effect sizes than did the aggregation-based studies. Analyses also revealed lower average effect sizes when the sample studied was in the classroom/lab as compared to the field. Task complexity significantly moderated the shared leadership, with lower effect sizes observed with more complex tasks. No significant influence of team task interdependence was observed. We highlight the relative value of employing social network theories and measures as compared to aggregate theories and measures of shared leadership. Directions for future research and application are discussed.

[1]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership process, efficacy, trust, and performance. , 1996 .

[2]  Glenn Firebaugh,et al.  A Rule for Inferring Individual-Level Relationships from Aggregate Data , 1978 .

[3]  Jay B. Carson,et al.  Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[4]  Martin L. Martens,et al.  Shared Leadership and Team Performance in a Business Strategy Simulation , 2010 .

[5]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team Description , 2012 .

[6]  Junji Ishikawa.  Transformational leadership and gatekeeping leadership: The roles of norm for maintaining consensus and shared leadership in team performance , 2012 .

[7]  E. Salas,et al.  Collective Behavior and Team Performance , 1992 .

[8]  A. Erez,et al.  EFFECTS OF ROTATED LEADERSHIP AND PEER EVALUATION ON THE FUNCTIONING AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF‐MANAGED TEAMS: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[9]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes , 2010 .

[10]  Vishal K. Gupta,et al.  A Longitudinal Examination of the Relationship Between Team Leadership and Performance , 2010 .

[11]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[13]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  The New Silver Bullets of Leadership:: The Importance of Self- and Shared Leadership in Knowledge Work , 2005 .

[14]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Teams Are Changing: Time to “Think Networks” , 2012, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[15]  Michael Armstrong,et al.  Improving organizational effectiveness , 1994 .

[16]  Hye-Ryun Kim.  Group behavior: performance, sick leave and job satisfaction as a function of within-group homogeneity , 1988 .

[17]  Wenpin Tsai,et al.  Social networks and organizations , 2003 .

[18]  W. D. Murry,et al.  A Longitudinal Model of the Effects of Team Leadership and Group Potency on Group Performance , 2002 .

[19]  Jonathan Cox,et al.  Toward a Model of Shared Leadership and Distributed Influence in the Innovation Process: How Shared Leadership Can Enhance New Product Development Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2003 .

[20]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four-Factor Theory of Leadership , 1966 .

[21]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. , 1997 .

[22]  R. Bolden.  Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research , 2011 .

[23]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example , 2006 .

[24]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Collective Leadership: The Selective Utilization of Leader and Team Expertise within Networks , 2009 .

[25]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  R. Peterson.  On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second‐Order Meta‐analysis , 2001 .

[27]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Assessing Shared Leadership: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Team Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire , 2003 .

[28]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  Shared Authentic Leadership and New Venture Performance , 2012 .

[29]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[30]  S. Taggar,et al.  Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. , 1999 .

[31]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Leadership capacity in teams , 2004 .

[32]  Léo F. C. Bruno,et al.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 2008 .

[33]  Jonathan C. Ziegert,et al.  Does More Than One Cook Spoil the Broth? An Examination of Shared Team Leadership , 2005 .

[34]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[35]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. , 2002 .

[36]  Martin Hoegl,et al.  Socio‐demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource management , 2012 .

[37]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[39]  Dorothy R. Carter,et al.  Networks: The Way Forward for Collectivistic Leadership Research , 2012, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[40]  Anton J. Villado,et al.  The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[42]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  The Importance of Vertical and Shared Leadership within New Venture Top Management Teams: Implications for the Performance of Startups , 2006 .

[43]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  ORA User's Guide 2011 , 2011 .

[44]  Brett R. Smith,et al.  Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. , 2006 .

[45]  유화자.  기독교 사역과 Leadership , 1997 .

[46]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Empowered Selling Teams: How Shared Leadership Can Contribute to Selling Team Outcomes , 2013 .

[47]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  The impact of shared leadership on teamwork mental models and performance in self-directed teams , 2013 .

[48]  Noel A. Card.  Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research , 2011 .

[49]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Julia E. Hoch.  Shared Leadership and Innovation: The Role of Vertical Leadership and Employee Integrity , 2012, Journal of business and psychology.

[51]  D. Day,et al.  Collective Enactment of Leadership Roles and Team Effectiveness: A Field Study , 2006 .

[52]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[53]  Mitchell Lee Marks,et al.  Employee participation in a Quality Circle program: Impact on quality of work life, productivity, and absenteeism. , 1986 .

[54]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[55]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The Etiology of the Multilevel Paradigm in Management Research , 2011 .

[57]  Martin T. Wells,et al.  USING RANDOM RATHER THAN FIXED EFFECTS MODELS IN META‐ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY AND VALIDITY GENERALIZATION , 1996 .

[58]  Keith Leavitt,et al.  Reducing the performance-cue bias in work behavior ratings: can groups help? , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  Charlotte R. Gerstner.  Leadership relationships and work group effectiveness: A multi-level empirical examination. , 1998 .

[60]  M. Lipsey,et al.  The Way in Which Intervention Studies Have “Personality” and why it is Important to Meta-Analysis , 2001, Evaluation & the health professions.

[61]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Indirect leadership: Transformational leadership at a distance. , 1994 .

[62]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[63]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Dynamic Delegation: Shared, Hierarchical, and Deindividualized Leadership in Extreme Action Teams , 2006 .

[64]  H. P. Sims,et al.  The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice , 2008 .

[65]  M. Méndez.  A closer look into collective leadership: Is leadership shared or distributed? , 2010 .

[66]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[67]  L. Offermann,et al.  Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. , 1990 .

[68]  Wencang Zhou.  Moderating and mediating effects of shared leadership on the relationship between entrepreneurial team diversity and performance , 2012 .

[69]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[70]  Carolyn Yates,et al.  A Creative Experience. , 1971 .

[71]  D. Cashman.  The effects of vertical leadership, team demographics, and group potency upon shared leadership emergence within technical organizations , 2008 .

[72]  D. Scott DeRue,et al.  Adaptive leadership theory: Leading and following as a complex adaptive process , 2011 .

[73]  J. Rentsch,et al.  Shared leadership in teams: A matter of distribution. , 2010 .

[74]  L. Chidambaram,et al.  Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams , 2006 .

[75]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to Type I error. , 1986 .

[76]  Jonathan I. Mitchell.  Work life and patient safety culture in Canadian healthcare: connecting the quality dots using national accreditation results. , 2012, Healthcare quarterly.

[77]  Johannes Wacker,et al.  Leadership in anaesthesia teams: the most effective leadership is shared , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[78]  Julia E. Hoch,et al.  Is the most effective team leadership shared? The impact of shared leadership, age diversity, and coordination on team performance. , 2010 .

[79]  Ali Alper Yayla,et al.  Social Capital, Collective Transformational Leadership, and Performance: A Resource-Based View of Self-Managed Teams , 2011 .

[80]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[81]  A. Seers,et al.  Can team members share leadership?: Foundations in research and theory , 2003 .

[82]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[83]  L. Berkowitz.  Sharing leadership in small, decision-making groups. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[84]  Jeffrey C. Kohles,et al.  The importance of self‐ and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso‐level model of leadership dynamics , 2006 .

[85]  Brian Keegan,et al.  The topology of collective leadership , 2012 .

[86]  B. Bass,et al.  Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. , 1995 .

[87]  F. Schmidt.  Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[88]  Margarita Mayo,et al.  SHARED LEADERSHIP IN WORK TEAMS: A SOCIAL NETWORK APPROACH , 2002 .

[89]  Ruth M. Ripley,et al.  Manual for RSiena , 2011 .

[90]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[91]  Chun Hsi Vivian Chen,et al.  Effects of transformational team leadership on collective efficacy and team performance , 2007 .

[92]  P. Killworth,et al.  The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data , 1984 .

[93]  B. Bass,et al.  The Bass handbook of leadership : theory, research, and managerial applications , 2008 .

[94]  Oliver Kuss,et al.  Meta-analysis macros for SAS , 1996 .

[95]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[96]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[97]  Robert T. Keller,et al.  Suboptimal Assessment of Interunit Task Interdependence: Modes of Integration and Information Processing for Coordination Performance , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[98]  Mitchell J. Neubert,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing or the more the Merrier? , 1999 .

[99]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[100]  M. Uhl‐Bien,et al.  Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing , 2006 .

[101]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[102]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  A Configural Theory of Team Processes: Accounting for the Structure of Taskwork and Teamwork , 2013 .

[103]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Shared Leadership: Toward a Multi-Level Theory of Leadership , 2000 .

[104]  Julia E. Hoch,et al.  Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[105]  J. Carroll.  The diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. , 2010, Quality management in health care.

[106]  M. Merry.  Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership , 2004 .

[107]  G. Yukl.  Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research , 1989 .

[108]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Who will Lead and Who will Follow? a Social Process of Leadership Identity Construction in Organizations , 2010 .

[109]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Leadership, Social Work, and Virtual Teams: The Relative Influence of Vertical Versus Shared Leadership in the Nonprofit Sector. , 2004 .

[110]  C. Pearce.  The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.