Optimization of heat treatment in cold-drawn 6063 aluminium tubes

Abstract The effect of heat treatment condition on mechanical properties and bendability of 6063 aluminium cold-drawn tubes was investigated. The standardized heat treatment presently used in manufacturing of cold-drawn tubes increases the cost and time of the process which ultimately reduces plant productivity. The effects of time, temperature, and furnace heating rate were studied in order to identify an optimized heat treatment for tubes with different cold work levels. Drawn from the as-extruded state, tubes were heat treated to under-aged, peak-aged, and over-aged conditions with time and temperature ranging from 1 min to 24 h and 130–200 °C, respectively. Mechanical properties were determined with full section tensile tests whereas tube bendability was evaluated on an industrial draw bending machine. These characteristics were evaluated in each condition in order to identify the heat treatment which allows conforming to 6063-T832 temper requirements and gives sufficient bendability. Moreover, bendability was successfully correlated to fracture strain measured during a uniaxial tensile test and a threshold value over which problem-free bending operation was determined.

[1]  H. Rack.  The influence of prior strain upon precipitation in a high-purity 6061 aluminum alloy☆ , 1977 .

[2]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Influence of aging condition on tensile and fatigue fracture behaviour of aluminium alloy 6063 , 1991 .

[3]  H. Abdullah,et al.  Influence of aging parameters on the mechanical properties of 6063 aluminium alloy , 2000 .

[4]  A. Oskarsson,et al.  Influence of Aging Conditions on the Microstructure and Tensile Strength of Aluminium alloy 6063 , 2002 .

[5]  H. Rack,et al.  Thermomechanical treatment of high purity 6061 aluminum , 1977 .

[6]  H. Aaronson,et al.  Sequences of precipitate nucleation , 1975 .

[7]  C. T. Yang,et al.  Correlation of Bendability of Materials With Their Tensile Properties , 1960 .

[8]  Z. Ismail.  Microstructure and mechanical properties developed by thermomechanical treatment in an AlMgSi alloy , 1995 .

[9]  M. Talianker,et al.  Aging impact on mechanical properties and microstructure of Al-6063 , 2000 .

[10]  S. Yannacopoulos,et al.  The effect of cold work on the precipitation kinetics of AA6111 aluminum , 2004 .

[11]  A. Deschamps,et al.  Influence of predeformation on ageing in an Al–Zn–Mg alloy—I. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties , 1998 .

[12]  J. D. Embury,et al.  Tensile properties and bendability of T4 treated AA6111 aluminum alloys , 2004 .

[13]  S. G. Luckey,et al.  Failure of Al-Mg-Si alloys in bending , 2002 .

[14]  H. Weiland,et al.  The effect of predeformation on the β″ and β′ precipitates and the role of Q′ phase in an Al–Mg–Si alloy; AA6022 , 2005 .

[15]  Y. Totik,et al.  The effects of artificial aging on wear properties of AA 6063 alloy , 2003 .

[16]  J. Dutkiewicz,et al.  The effect of plastic deformation on structure and properties of chosen 6000 series aluminium alloys , 2002 .