Non-native phonemic discrimination, phonological short term memory, and word learning

Abstract Accurately perceiving non-native speech sounds is known to be very difficult. Numerous studies provide strong and converging evidence that this difficulty varies systematically, depending on the properties of the non-native sounds and the native language of the listener. There is substantially less research on how phonetic and phonological structure relates to individual differences in the ability to perceive non-native phonemes, though individual differences in auditory abilities are well-documented. The present work reports two experiments aimed at elucidating the structure of individual differences in non-native speech perception and the relationship between these abilities, phonological short term memory, and early second language word learning. In Experiment 1, confirmatory factor analysis of discrimination data for nine non-native contrasts from different languages indicates that voicing and place (segmental) contrasts pattern together and distinct from tone (suprasegmental) contrasts. In Experiment 2, the results indicate that phonological short term memory and discrimination ability both predict word learning accuracy and that discrimination ability does so in a mostly feature-specific manner.

[1]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[2]  J E Flege,et al.  Chinese subjects' perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast: performance before and after training. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Brian Gygi,et al.  Individual differences in auditory abilities. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[5]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  Perceptual switching in Spanish/English bilinguals , 1988 .

[6]  D. Ennis,et al.  The effect of dimensionality on results from the triangular method , 1985 .

[7]  J E Flege,et al.  Adults’ perception of native and nonnative vowels: Implications for the perceptual magnet effect , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[10]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e) , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  J. Flege.  The Interlingual Identification of Spanish and English Vowels: Orthographic Evidence , 1991 .

[12]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[13]  J. Flege,et al.  Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels , 1997 .

[14]  P Iverson,et al.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J E Flege,et al.  The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: a multidimensional scaling analysis. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems , 2003, Speech Commun..

[17]  J. Flege,et al.  An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Fox,et al.  Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Victoria B. Anderson,et al.  Acoustic and Perceptual Similarities Between English and Korean Sibilants: Implications for Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[20]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The Prediction of Success in Intensive Foreign Language Training. , 1964 .

[21]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Flege.  Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[23]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Scaling Corrections for Statistics in Covariance Structure Analysis , 1988 .

[24]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[25]  J. Flege,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LINGUISTIC EXPERIENCE ON ARABS’ PERCEPTION OF THE ENGLISH /s/ vs. /z/ CONTRAST , 1984 .

[26]  L Polka,et al.  Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .

[28]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[29]  Yen-Chen Hao,et al.  Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[30]  J. Harnsberger.  The Influence of Short-term and Long-term Memory on the Identification and Discrimination of Non-native Speech Sounds 1 , 2000 .

[31]  Paul Pimsleur.  UNDER-ACHIEVEMENT IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING. FINAL REPORT. , 1963 .

[32]  E. Fava,et al.  A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE PERCEPTION OF VOWELS IN A SECOND LANGUAGE , 2006 .

[33]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  Perceptual switching in Spanish/English bilinguals , 1993 .

[34]  D. Ennis,et al.  Theoretical aspects of sensory discrimination , 1986 .

[35]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Flege,et al.  Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers , 1987 .

[37]  Catherine T Best,et al.  Perception of non-native tonal contrasts : effects of native phonological and phonetic influences , 2006 .

[38]  Albert Costa,et al.  Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[40]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[41]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Tsuneo Yamada,et al.  Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/ , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[43]  S. Pickering,et al.  Dissociable Lexical and Phonological Influences on Serial Recognition and Serial Recall , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  C S Watson,et al.  Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  J. Flege,et al.  Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast , 1989 .

[46]  John B. Carroll,et al.  Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. , 1990 .

[47]  V. Mann,et al.  Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of / / and /l/. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  L. Humes,et al.  Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[49]  J. Harnsberger.  The Influence of Short-term and Long-term Memory on the Identification and Discrimination of Non-native Speech Sounds , 2001 .

[50]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Cross-frequency interaction of the eye-movement related LFP signals in V1 of freely viewing monkeys , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[52]  M. Coltheart,et al.  358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[53]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology , 2009, Brain and Language.

[54]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[55]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Cross-language perception of nonnative vowels: Phonological and phonetic effects of listeners' native languages , 2003 .

[56]  J. Flege.  Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of english , 1987, Speech Commun..

[58]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. , 2002 .

[60]  Bin Li,et al.  Effects of two training procedures in cross-language perception of tones , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[61]  J. Flege,et al.  Native Speakers of Spanish Show Rate-Dependent Processing of English Stop Consonants , 1995, Phonetica.

[62]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  Anders Højen,et al.  Early learners' discrimination of second-language vowels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  Kuo-Chan Sun,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of Taiwanese tone perception by Taiwanese and English listeners , 2012 .

[65]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[66]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  J. Flege,et al.  Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[69]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Perceptual magnet and phoneme boundary effects in speech perception: Do they arise from a common mechanism? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[70]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.