Coordination between smart distribution networks and multi-microgrids considering demand side management: A trilevel framework

Abstract This paper addresses the dilemma of coordination among three kinds of stakeholders, namely, the smart distribution networks, microgrids, and customers with demand response resources under a comprehensive trilevel framework. The interaction among these stakeholders, which are regarded as subjects of individual interest, leads to a complex energy generation, storage, transaction, and consumption problem. Based on the assumption that the customers always provide the best response to the signals of leaders, the trilevel problem is transformed into a bilevel problem by replacing the lowest level problem with its optimality conditions. Next, two coordination schemes are formulated to analyze the interactions between the smart distribution network and microgrids with demand response resources. The first scheme is a full cooperative coordination framework, in which the smart distribution network and microgrids jointly activate the resources located under the distribution networks. The second scheme is an ancillary service framework in the sense that the smart distribution network acts as a service subject to balance the supply and demand of the networks, and charges the management fee for transmission service. This scheme can achieve rapid convergence in a distributed manner, expose little information, and protect the privacy of the selfish participants. For each coordination scheme, a detailed mathematical model and solution method are formed. Illustrative examples highlight the feasibility and applicability of the schemes and provide references for the government in making decision with respect to the problems of coordination among the smart distribution networks, microgrids, and customers.

[1]  Sajad Najafi Ravadanegh,et al.  Optimal Power Dispatch of Multi-Microgrids at Future Smart Distribution Grids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Coordinated Energy Management of Networked Microgrids in Distribution Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Xin Yang,et al.  Stackelberg-Nash Equilibrium for Integrated Gravelly Soil Excavation-Transportation-Distribution System in a Large-Scale Hydropower Construction Project , 2016, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[4]  Alexander Mitsos,et al.  Global solution of nonlinear mixed-integer bilevel programs , 2010, J. Glob. Optim..

[5]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  Optimal power flow management for distributed energy resources with batteries , 2015 .

[6]  Jacqueline C. K. Lam,et al.  Smart demand response in China: Challenges and drivers , 2017 .

[7]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[8]  Wei Feng,et al.  Robust optimization for energy transactions in multi-microgrids under uncertainty , 2018 .

[9]  Ming Jin,et al.  Microgrid to enable optimal distributed energy retail and end-user demand response , 2018 .

[10]  Miao Li,et al.  Economic and environmental optimization for distributed energy resource systems coupled with district energy networks , 2016 .

[11]  Stephan Dempe,et al.  Is bilevel programming a special case of a mathematical program with complementarity constraints? , 2012, Math. Program..

[12]  Ahmad Ghasemi,et al.  A hybrid price-based demand response program for the residential micro-grid , 2019, Energy.

[13]  Seung Ho Hong,et al.  An Incentive-Based Demand Response (DR) Model Considering Composited DR Resources , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Game theory based interactive demand side management responding to dynamic pricing in price-based demand response of smart grids , 2019, Applied Energy.

[15]  Marcos J. Rider,et al.  Bilevel approach for optimal location and contract pricing of distributed generation in radial distribution systems using mixed-integer linear programming , 2013 .

[16]  Zhongfu Tan,et al.  A bi-level stochastic scheduling optimization model for a virtual power plant connected to a wind–photovoltaic–energy storage system considering the uncertainty and demand response , 2016 .

[17]  Steffen Rebennack,et al.  Tailored Benders Decomposition for a Long-Term Power Expansion Model with Short-Term Demand Response , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Jianwei Huang,et al.  Incentivizing Energy Trading for Interconnected Microgrids , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[19]  Mengmeng Yu,et al.  Incentive-based demand response considering hierarchical electricity market: A Stackelberg game approach , 2017 .

[20]  Wei-Jen Lee,et al.  The optimal structure planning and energy management strategies of smart multi energy systems , 2018, Energy.

[21]  Xiang Ji,et al.  Autonomous optimized economic dispatch of active distribution system with multi-microgrids , 2018, Energy.

[22]  M. Parsa Moghaddam,et al.  Modeling cooperation of multi-microgrids in smart distribution netowroks , 2016, 2016 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT-Asia).

[23]  S. Minner,et al.  Benders Decomposition for Discrete–Continuous Linear Bilevel Problems with application to traffic network design , 2014 .

[24]  An iterative approach for a bi-level competitive supply chain network design problem under foresight competition and variable coverage , 2018 .

[25]  Y. Parag,et al.  Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[26]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Miguel Angel Sanz-Bobi,et al.  Profit-maximization generation maintenance scheduling through bi-level programming , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Javad Salehi,et al.  Optimal scheduling of active distribution networks with penetration of PHEV considering congestion and air pollution using DR program , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[29]  Gerard Debreu,et al.  A Social Equilibrium Existence Theorem* , 1952, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Nicole D. Sintov,et al.  Inaccurate consumer perceptions of monetary savings in a demand-side response programme predict programme acceptance , 2018, Nature Energy.

[31]  S. A. MirHassani,et al.  Lagrangean relaxation-based algorithm for bi-level problems , 2015, Optim. Methods Softw..

[32]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Convergence properties of analytical target cascading , 2002 .

[33]  Salah Bahramara,et al.  A risk-based approach for modeling the strategic behavior of a distribution company in wholesale energy market , 2018 .

[34]  T. Ackermann,et al.  Interaction between distributed generation and the distribution network: operation aspects , 2002, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition.

[35]  Mahmoud-Reza Haghifam,et al.  Modelling hierarchical decision making framework for operation of active distribution grids , 2015 .

[36]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Portfolio and contract design for demand response resources , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Z. Vale,et al.  Demand response in electrical energy supply: An optimal real time pricing approach , 2011 .

[38]  Tomohiro Hayashida,et al.  Electricity retail market model with flexible price settings and elastic price-based demand responses by consumers in distribution network , 2016 .

[39]  Didier Aussel,et al.  A trilevel model for best response in energy demand-side management , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  S. B. Sinha,et al.  KKT transformation approach for multi-objective multi-level linear programming problems , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Tripta Thakur,et al.  Smart electricity distribution networks, business models, and application for developing countries. , 2018 .

[42]  Alessandro Romagnoli,et al.  Energy storage technologies as techno-economic parameters for master-planning and optimal dispatch in smart multi energy systems , 2019, Applied Energy.

[43]  Chengshan Wang,et al.  A robust operation-based scheduling optimization for smart distribution networks with multi-microgrids , 2018, Applied Energy.

[44]  Sean P. Meyn,et al.  Energy Markets and Responsive Grids: Modeling, Control, and Optimization , 2018 .

[45]  M. Behrangrad A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market , 2015 .

[46]  Wen-Zhan Song,et al.  Optimal Pricing and Energy Scheduling for Hybrid Energy Trading Market in Future Smart Grid , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[47]  Heresh Seyedi,et al.  Strategic decision-making of distribution network operator with multi-microgrids considering demand response program , 2017 .

[48]  P. Pinson,et al.  Design and game-Theoretic analysis of community-Based market mechanisms in heat and electricity systems , 2021, Omega.

[49]  Sahand Ghavidel,et al.  Demand Response Modeling in Microgrid Operation: a Review and Application for Incentive-Based and Time-Based Programs , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[50]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A SYSTEM PARTITIONING AND OPTIMIZATION APPROACH TO TARGET CASCADING , 1999 .

[51]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  Optimal dispatch for a microgrid incorporating renewables and demand response , 2017 .

[52]  Hongjian Sun,et al.  Demand Side Management in Microgrid Control Systems , 2017 .

[53]  Mehdi Ehsan,et al.  A Probabilistic Modeling of Photo Voltaic Modules and Wind Power Generation Impact on Distribution Networks , 2012, IEEE Systems Journal.

[54]  Damien Paire,et al.  A price decision approach for multiple multi-energy-supply microgrids considering demand response , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[55]  H. F. Más,et al.  Integrating demand side management into EU electricity distribution system operation: A Dutch example , 2019, Energy Policy.

[56]  Behrooz Vahidi,et al.  Two-level decision-making model for a distribution company in day-ahead market , 2015 .

[57]  Ning Lu,et al.  Control and Size Energy Storage Systems for Managing Energy Imbalance of Variable Generation Resources , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.