An Approach to Represent and Communicate Product or System Design Ideas at the Fuzzy-Front End of the Design Process

The primary challenge underscored and dealt with was how to represent the product’s or system’s use environment and processes and to communicate ideas and envisaged use contexts effectively at the fuzzy-front early stages of the design process. The work focused specifically on complex products or systems with physical, software and/or cyber components, and the question was how to represent, e.g., the operations of the product or system and the interactions between the user and the product or system betimes in the period between when an opportunity for a new product or system is first considered, and when the idea is judged to be ready to enter formal development. Several approaches are currently being used to express and to communicate ideas at the conceptualization, embodiment, and detail design stages of the design process, but none of them address the challenge described above. We therefore adapted and extended the abstract prototyping concept to allow for total representation of ideas, as well as of use environments and processes early on. Extended abstract prototyping (Ext-AP) entails using combinations of low and high-fidelity prototyping techniques to create cognitive virtual representations, which represent and help designers to express ideas and use contexts—namely, what complex product or system would be like, and how its users would interact with it. Real-world product development case studies have been used to demonstrate how the Ext-AP technique can be put into practice. One of the main observations from the application case studies is that the Ext-AP technique enabled the subjects to express ideas and use contexts more effectively early on. In addition, the extended abstract prototypes (Ext-APs) offered a low cost, yet effective solution for expressing ideas, representing concepts and using contexts, and allowed the subjects to think divergently, make associations, easily and quickly construct, combine, and evaluate alternatives, and work together on multiple ideas simultaneously.

[1]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[2]  Stephan Sonnenburg,et al.  Creativity in Communication: A Theoretical Framework for Collaborative Product Creation , 2004 .

[3]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  ARIS Architecture and Reference Models for Business Process Management , 2000, Business Process Management.

[4]  Thomas B. Ward,et al.  Creative expression in virtual worlds: Imitation, imagination, and individualized collaboration. , 2011 .

[5]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[6]  Ruth Sara Aguilar-Savén,et al.  Business process modelling: Review and framework , 2004 .

[7]  Eliab Z. Opiyo Facilitating the development of design support software by abstract prototyping , 2003 .

[8]  Omer and Weinel Eleanor F. Akin Representation and Architecture , 1982 .

[9]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Extending the Scope of Quality Assurance of CAD Systems: Putting Underlying Engineering Principles, Theories, and Methods on the Spotlight , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Some future trends and implications for systems and software engineering processes , 2006, Syst. Eng..

[11]  Sylvie Duvernoy,et al.  Architecture’s New Media:Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer-Aided Design , 2005 .

[12]  Yu Song,et al.  Supporting optimization of complex product development processes through simulation: A case-study of thick film heaters development processes , 2015 .

[13]  Eliab Zephania Opiyo REALIZING A TRULY 3D PRODUCT VISUALIZATION ENVIRONMENT – A CASE FOR USING HOLOGRAPHIC DISPLAYS , 2011 .

[14]  Geoffrey Broadbent,et al.  Design in architecture : architecture and the human sciences / Geoffrey Broadbent , 1973 .

[15]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Streaming video over the Internet: approaches and directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[16]  G. Goldschmidt To see eye to eye: the role of visual representations in building shared mental models in design teams , 2007 .

[17]  R. Spencer Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration , 2008 .

[18]  Dang X. Cu,et al.  Architecture: The Story of Practice , 1991 .

[19]  Martin Glinz,et al.  An Integrated Formal Model of Scenarios Based on Statecharts , 1995, ESEC.

[20]  A. Cropley Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? , 2000 .

[21]  Chris Esposito User interface issues for virtual reality systems , 1996, CHI 1996.

[22]  John Baer,et al.  Essentials of Creativity Assessment , 2008 .

[23]  Helen Gill,et al.  Cyber-Physical Systems , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM).

[24]  Min Basadur,et al.  Collaborative Problem Solving Through Creativity in Problem Definition: Expanding the Pie , 2000 .

[25]  Eliab Z. Opiyo Supporting the Ideation Process and Representation of the Design of a Product as Part of a Real Life Use Process , 2012 .

[26]  Bruce McMillin,et al.  Software engineering: What is it? , 2018, 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[27]  G. Goldschmidt,et al.  How Does Cognitive Conflict in Design Teams Support the Development of Creative Ideas? , 2010 .

[28]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[29]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Group genius : the creative power of collaboration , 2007 .

[30]  Valdis Berzins,et al.  Software prototyping , 2003 .

[31]  Chris Leger Representation and Architecture , 2000 .

[32]  Jaewook Lee,et al.  User-centric knowledge representations based on ontology for AEC design collaboration , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[33]  Adrie Kooijman,et al.  An Information Technological Specification of Abstract Prototyping for Artifact and Service Combinations , 2011 .

[34]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Quality assurance of design support software: review and analysis of the state of the art , 2002, Comput. Ind..

[35]  Reinhard Budde,et al.  Prototyping: An Approach to Evolutionary System Development , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.