Modal analysis of jet flow from a coaxial nozzle with central plug

The present paper deals with azimuthal analysis of a double stream flow with a central plug nozzle. Onera previous works on jet noise permited to validate a computation method that is in good agreement with measurments. The next step is to use file stored aerodynamic flow field from LES CFD simulations to understand the generation of jet noise through azimuthal decomposition. Firstly, configurations an d aerodynamic results are presented. Azimuthal decomposition method formulas are then given. Far field acoustics results are followed by rms pressure field on the stored region . After analyzing the rms pressure maximum for five lines parallel to jet axis, azimut hal composition is given for these lines. Line at r=0,405D passes through the maximum of rms pressure. All lines permit to conclude that mode m=0 is dominant in most regions of the jet flow field. The end of this analysis is focused on frequency influence on mode contribution and spatial repartition. This study gives clues to establish an identity card of the az imuthal structure of jet flow. This structure is believed to be very influent on jet noise genera tion and propagation to far field.

[1]  Jean-Luc Estivalezes,et al.  Application of Large-Eddy Simulations and Kirchhoff Method to Jet Noise Prediction , 1998 .

[2]  Francois Vuillot,et al.  Double-Stream Nozzles Flow and Noise Computations and Comparisons to Experiments , 2008 .

[3]  Francois Vuillot,et al.  Comprehensive 3D unsteady simulations of subsonic and supersonic hot jet flow-fields , 2002 .

[4]  Guillermo Rein,et al.  44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit , 2006 .

[5]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Effects of Inflow Conditions and Forcing on Subsonic Jet Flows and Noise. , 2005 .

[6]  Francois Vuillot,et al.  Flow field analysis for double stream nozzle: application to jet noise , 2008 .

[7]  Andrey Garbaruk,et al.  Further Steps in LES-Based Noise Prediction for Complex Jets , 2006 .

[8]  J. Freund Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9 , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Maxime Huet,et al.  Numerical Investigation of the Micro-Jets Efficiency for Jet Noise Reduction , 2009 .

[10]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  Noise-source turbulence statistics and the noise from a Mach 0.9 jet , 2003 .

[11]  Sébastien Barré,et al.  Simulation of a hot coaxial jet: Direct noise prediction and flow-acoustics correlations , 2009 .

[12]  Peter Jordan,et al.  The frequency dependence of jet turbulence for noise source modelling , 2006 .

[13]  C. Bogey,et al.  Noise Investigation of a High Subsonic, Moderate Reynolds Number Jet Using a Compressible Large Eddy Simulation , 2003 .

[14]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  On using large-eddy simulation for the prediction of noise from cold and heated turbulent jets , 2005 .

[15]  Lars-Erik Eriksson,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of a Mach 0.75 Jet , 2003 .

[16]  Charles E. Tinney,et al.  A study in the near pressure field of co-axial subsonic jets , 2006 .

[17]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Direct computation of Mach wave radiation in an axisymmetric supersonic jet , 1997 .

[18]  N.W.M. Ko,et al.  The initial region of subsonic coaxial jets , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  C. Tinney,et al.  Coupling mechanisms in a co-axial transonic jet. , 2007 .

[20]  F. Kerherve,et al.  Modelling the Frequency Dependence of Two-Point Turbulence Properties In Jet Flows , 2007 .

[21]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Computation of Jet Noise using a Hybrid Approach , 2007 .

[22]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Direct Simulation Of A Mach 1.92 Jet And Its Sound Field , 1998 .

[23]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  Investigation of downstream and sideline subsonic jet noise using Large Eddy Simulation , 2006 .