The influence of executive capacity on selective attention and subsequent processing

Recent investigations that suggest selective attention (SA) is dependent on top-down control mechanisms lead to the expectation that individuals with high executive capacity (EC) would exhibit more robust neural indices of SA. This prediction was tested by using event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine differences in markers of information processing across 25 subjects divided into two groups based on high vs. average EC, as defined by neuropsychological test scores. Subjects performed an experimental task requiring SA to a specified color. In contrast to expectation, individuals with high and average EC did not differ in the size of ERP indices of SA: the anterior Selection Positivity (SP) and posterior Selection Negativity (SN). However, there were substantial differences between groups in markers of subsequent processing, including the anterior N2 (a measure of attentional control) and the P3a (an index of the orienting of attention). EC predicted speed of processing at both early and late attentional stages. Individuals with lower EC exhibited prolonged SN, P3a, and P3b latencies. However, the delays in carrying out SA operations did not account for subsequent delays in decision making, or explain excessive orienting and reduced attentional control mechanisms in response to stimuli that should have been ignored. SN latency, P3 latency, and the size of the anterior N2 made independent contributions to the variance of EC. In summary, our findings suggest that current views regarding the relationship between top-down control mechanisms and SA may need refinement.

[1]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[2]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[3]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[5]  J. J. Ryan,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III , 2001 .

[6]  A. Kok,et al.  Early and late selection in young and old adults: an event-related potential study. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[7]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Neural Suppression of Irrelevant Information Underlies Optimal Working Memory Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Frontal and Parietal Components of a Cerebral Network Mediating Voluntary Attention to Novel Events , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Kirk R. Daffner,et al.  Age-related changes in early novelty processing as measured by ERPs , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[12]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[13]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Bruno Kopp,et al.  Temporal dynamics of selective attention and conflict resolution during cross-dimensional go-nogo decisions , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[15]  R T Knight,et al.  Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[16]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[18]  J. Greene.  Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment , 1995 .

[19]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  To Ignore or Explore: Top-Down Modulation of Novelty Processing , 2008, J. Cogn. Neurosci..

[20]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Does modulation of selective attention to features reflect enhancement or suppression of neural activity? , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[21]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Age-related changes in hemispheric organization , 2005 .

[23]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Delis‐Kaplan Executive Function System , 2008 .

[24]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[25]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  Janette L. Smith,et al.  Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Joseph J. Ryan,et al.  A screening procedure for estimating premorbid intelligence in the elderly , 1992 .

[28]  E Donchin,et al.  Resource reciprocity: an event-related brain potentials analysis. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[29]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[30]  M. Searl,et al.  The dysexecutive syndromes. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[31]  D. Finkelhor,et al.  ADMINISTRATION AND SCORING MANUAL , 2001 .

[32]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Aging Gracefully: Compensatory Brain Activity in High-Performing Older Adults , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[34]  D. Wechsler.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[35]  S. Makeig,et al.  Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  D. Tucker,et al.  Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  G Mulder,et al.  Attention to color: an analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Compensatory neural activity distinguishes different patterns of normal cognitive aging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[40]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[41]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Neuropsychological tests' norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO , 1996 .

[42]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Delays in neural processing during working memory encoding in normal aging , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  O. Selnes.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests , 1991, Neurology.

[46]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Intelligence and neural efficiency , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[47]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[48]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience , 1986 .

[49]  Elmer S. West.  From the U. S. A. , 1965 .

[50]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[51]  Andreas Mueller,et al.  Dissociating action inhibition, conflict monitoring and sensory mismatch into independent components of event related potentials in GO/NOGO task , 2011, NeuroImage.

[52]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[53]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Early Top–Down Control of Visual Processing Predicts Working Memory Performance , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  A. Starr,et al.  P300 latency correlates with digit span. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[55]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical volume and speed-of-processing are complementary in prediction of performance intelligence , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[57]  A. Kok.  Age-related changes in involuntary and voluntary attention as reflected in components of the event-related potential (ERP) , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[58]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Regulation of attention to novel stimuli by frontal lobes: an event‐related potential study , 1998, Neuroreport.

[59]  Philip A. Vernon,et al.  Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research , 2008 .

[60]  L. Bérubé,et al.  [Clinical neuropsychology]. , 1982, Nursing Quebec.

[61]  Janet B W Williams,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[62]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[63]  T. Braver,et al.  Vive les differences! Individual variation in neural mechanisms of executive control , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[64]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[65]  T. Xiao,et al.  Response preparation and cognitive control of highly intelligent children: a Go-Nogo event-related potential study , 2011, Neuroscience.

[66]  W. Alexander.  American psychiatric association. , 2008, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[67]  A. Kok.  On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[68]  Kristine B Walhovd,et al.  The relationship between P3 and neuropsychological function in an adult life span sample , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[69]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[70]  Francisco Barceló,et al.  Task Switching and Novelty Processing Activate a Common Neural Network for Cognitive Control , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[72]  O. Spreen,et al.  Comprar A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests - Administration, Norms, and Commentary | Esther Strauss | 9780195159578 | Oxford University Press , 2009 .

[73]  D. Friedman.  Cognition and Aging: A Highly Selective Overview of Event-Related Potential (ERP) Data , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[74]  M. Schlossberg.  The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation. , 1986 .

[75]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying Age- and Performance-related Differences in Working Memory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  T. Toulopoulou,et al.  Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. , 2008, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[77]  H. Gibbons,et al.  An ERP study of the processing of response conflict in a dynamic localization task: The role of individual differences in task-appropriate behavior , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[78]  Risa Sawaki,et al.  Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations. , 2008, Journal of vision.