Combating Online Abuse: What Drives People to Use Online Reporting Functions on Social Networking Sites

Online abuse has emerged as a huge problem across the Internet and especially on social networking sites (SNSs). To combat this unacceptable online behavior, many SNS providers begin to implement built-in reporting functions/systems on their platforms. However, the effectiveness of this new function on SNSs depends on users' willingness to adopt and use. Thus, the main objective of this study is to identify the factors driving people to use the built-in reporting functions on SNSs. Drawing upon Theory of Cognitive Appraisal and the literature of social appraisal, we identified three major appraisal processes related to the use of online reporting functions on SNSs: primary appraisal (perceived emergency and perceived responsibility), secondary appraisal (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) and social appraisal (evaluation apprehension). We tested our research model with 117 Facebook users. Our findings suggest that perceived responsibility of the incident and perceived usefulness of the reporting functions are important factors promoting the use of built-in online reporting functions, whereas evaluation apprehension is an obstructing social factor to the use of built-in reporting functions. We expect that the results of this study make significant contributions to research and practice.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Notice for ‘Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences’ , 2014 .

[3]  A. Manstead,et al.  Social appraisal: the social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes , 2001 .

[4]  Gianluca Gini,et al.  Friend similarity in attitudes toward bullying and sense of responsibility to intervene , 2013 .

[5]  Norman Miller,et al.  Personal responsibility and altruism in children , 1982 .

[6]  Francine Dehue,et al.  Cyberbullying: Youngsters' Experiences and Parental Perception , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  David Gefen,et al.  The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 1998, DATB.

[8]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  D. Laible,et al.  Dimensions of Conscience in Mid-adolescence: Links with Social Behavior, Parenting, and Temperament , 2008 .

[10]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Adoption of the Internet and WAP-enabled phones in Singapore , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Comparing student perceptions of coping strategies and school interventions in managing bullying and cyberbullying incidents , 2012 .

[12]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[13]  R. Zajonc SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[14]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  F. Mishna,et al.  Real-World Dangers in an Online Reality: A Qualitative Study Examining Online Relationships and Cyber Abuse , 2009 .

[16]  Elizabeth D. Cox,et al.  Problematic internet use among US youth: a systematic review. , 2011, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[17]  Dongwon Lee,et al.  On the Explanation of Factors Affecting E-Commerce Adoption , 2001, ICIS.

[18]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring , 2007 .

[20]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[21]  Stacey J. Bosick,et al.  Reporting violence to the police: Predictors through the life course , 2012 .

[22]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. , 2014, Journal of adolescence.

[23]  Louis A. Penner,et al.  The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior , 2006 .

[24]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide , 2010, Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research.

[25]  James Hollings,et al.  Let the Story Go: The Role of Emotion in the Decision-Making Process of the Reluctant, Vulnerable Witness or Whistle-Blower , 2013 .

[26]  Enrique Gracia,et al.  Police Involvement in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women The Influence of Perceived Severity and Personal Responsibility , 2008 .

[27]  S. Folkman,et al.  Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  Threat or coping appraisal: determinants of SMB executives’ decision to adopt anti-malware software , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Rebecca Jacob,et al.  Responsibility and accountability , 2015, Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology.

[30]  F. Mishna,et al.  Risk Factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies, and bully-victims , 2012 .

[31]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Avoidance of Information Technology Threats: A Theoretical Perspective , 2009, MIS Q..

[32]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[33]  Mark Keil,et al.  Organizational Silence and Whistle-Blowing on IT Projects: An Integrated Model , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[34]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Virginia Ilie,et al.  Psychological Reactance And User Workarounds. A Study In The Context Of Electronic Medical Records Implementations , 2013, ECIS.

[36]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  The role of perceptions, appraisals and anticipated emotions in shaping reporting behavior in response to wrongdoing , 2013 .

[37]  C. Bolman,et al.  Coping with Cyberbullying: Differences Between Victims, Bully‐victims and Children not Involved in Bullying , 2013 .

[38]  Roger Tarling,et al.  Reporting Crime to the Police , 2010 .

[39]  Chien Chou,et al.  An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Stanley Schachter,et al.  The Psychology of Affiliation: Experimental Studies of the Sources of Gregariousness , 1959 .

[41]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  The role of coping in the emotions and how coping changes over the life course. , 1996 .

[42]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  The Drivers in the Use of Online Whistle-Blowing Reporting Systems , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions , 1993 .

[44]  R. Lazarus Psychological stress and the coping process , 1970 .

[45]  Meng-Jia Wu,et al.  Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Cyber Abuse of Youth: A Systematic Review , 2011 .

[46]  Gianluca Gini,et al.  Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: The Role of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Peer Pressure , 2010, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[47]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  The cognition–emotion debate: A bit of history. , 2005 .

[48]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  “FearNot!”: a computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention , 2011 .

[49]  M. Orand,et al.  ‘I was bullied too’: stories of bullying and coping in an online community , 2015 .

[50]  Stephen A. Rains The Impact of Anonymity on Perceptions of Source Credibility and Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Communication: A Test of Two Competing Hypotheses , 2007, Commun. Res..

[51]  P. Bordia,et al.  Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits , 2006 .

[52]  J. Juvonen,et al.  Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, but Names Will Make Me Feel Sick: The Psychosocial, Somatic, and Scholastic Consequences of Peer Harassment , 2005, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[53]  Janis Wolak,et al.  Reporting Assaults Against Juveniles to the Police , 2003 .

[54]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[55]  Peter Fischer,et al.  Coping With Terrorism: The Impact of Increased Salience of Terrorism on Mood and Self-Efficacy of Intrinsically Religious and Nonreligious People , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  Wendy C. Budin,et al.  Making Things Right: Nurses' Experiences with Workplace Bullying—A Grounded Theory , 2012, Nursing research and practice.

[57]  Shawn Meghan Burn,et al.  A Situational Model of Sexual Assault Prevention through Bystander Intervention , 2009 .

[58]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors , 2007 .

[59]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[60]  Megan Price,et al.  Cyberbullying: experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. , 2010 .

[61]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[62]  Maeve Duggan,et al.  Social Media Update 2016 , 2016 .

[63]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.