Visuomotor links in awareness: evidence from extinction

In patients with extinction, ipsilesional stimuli may abolish awareness of contralesional stimuli. Explanations of extinction often assume a serial model of processing in which sensory competition and identification precedes the selection of responses. We tested the adequacy of this assumption by examining the effects of response variables on visual awareness in six patients using signal detection analysis. Ipsilesional stimuli modulated patients' response criteria in deciding whether a contralesional stimulus was a target, and response modality (verbal or motor) modulated patients' abilities to discriminate between contralesional targets and distractors. This pattern of input variables modulating response criteria and output variables modulating discriminability indicates the extent to which attentional and intentional systems are tightly intertwined, with bi-directional effects in producing visual awareness.

[1]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Active and passive activation of left limbs: Influence on visual and sensory neglect , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Language and space: some interactions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Binding Personal and Peripersonal Space: Evidence from Tactile Extinction , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[8]  K M Heilman,et al.  Nonsensory neglect , 1978, Annals of neurology.

[9]  E. Weinstein,et al.  Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization , 1977 .

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neglect as a neural representation deficit. , 1990, Revue neurologique.

[11]  P. Roland,et al.  Functional anatomy of reaching and visuomotor learning: a positron emission tomography study. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Dyschiria. An Attempt at its Systemic Explanation , 1987 .

[13]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Natural extinction: A criterion shift phenomenon , 2002 .

[14]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[15]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual pathways to perception and action. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[16]  Giuseppe di Pellegrino,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence of an Integrated Visuotactile Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Input and Response Determinants of Visual Extinction: A Case Study , 1996, Cortex.

[18]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Sensory and Response Interference by Ipsilesional Stimuli in Tactile Extinction , 2000, Cortex.

[19]  L. Diller,et al.  Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: the evolution of a rational remediation program. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[20]  Gordon C. Baylis,et al.  Visual extinction and awareness: The importance of binding dorsal and ventral pathways , 2001 .

[21]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Evidence for a unimodal somatosensory attention system , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  E. De Renzi,et al.  An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction. , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. Goodale,et al.  Chapter 28 Visual pathways to perception and action , 1993 .

[24]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Sensory and response contributions to visual awareness in extinction , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  K. Heilman,et al.  Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[26]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[27]  G Vallar,et al.  Influence of response modality on perceptual awareness of contralesional visual stimuli. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.