Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.

Mobile phone distracted driving is a recurrent issue in road safety worldwide. Recent research on driving behaviour of distracted drivers suggests that in certain circumstances drivers seem to assume safer behaviours while using a mobile phone. Despite a high volume of research on this topic, self-regulation by mobile phone distracted drivers is not well understood as many driving simulator experiments are designed to impose an equal level of distraction to participants being tested for their driving performance. The aim of this research was to investigate the relationship between self-regulatory secondary task performance and driving. By a driving simulator experiment in which participants were allowed to perform their secondary tasks whenever they feel appropriate, the driving performance of 35 drivers aged 18-29 years was observed under three phone conditions including non-distraction (no phone use), hands-free interactions and visual-manual interactions in the CARRS-Q advanced driving simulator. Drivers' longitudinal and lateral vehicle control observed across various road traffic conditions were then modelled by Generalized Estimation Equations (GEE) with exchangeable correlation structure accounting for heterogeneity resulting from multiple observations from the same driver. Results show that the extent of engagement in the secondary task influence both longitudinal and lateral control of vehicles. Drivers who engaged in a large number of hands-free interactions are found to select lower driving speed. In contrast, longer visual-manual interactions are found to result in higher driving speed among drivers self-regulating their secondary task. Among the road traffic conditions, drivers distracted by their self-regulated secondary tasks are found to select lower speeds along the s-curve compared to straight and motorway segments. In summary, the applied human-machine system approach suggests that road traffic demands play a vital role in both secondary task management and driving performance.

[1]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Simon Washington,et al.  Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[3]  Kristie Lee Young,et al.  Driver engagement in distracting activities and the strategies used to minimise risk , 2010 .

[4]  Krsto Lipovac,et al.  Mobile phone use while driving-literary review , 2017 .

[6]  David Shinar,et al.  To call or not to call--that is the question (while driving). , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Ingrid van Schagen,et al.  Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Temporal and spatial analyses of rear-end crashes at signalized intersections. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  John D. Lee,et al.  Factors moderating the impact of distraction on driving performance and safety , 2009 .

[10]  Paul Atchley,et al.  Potential Benefits and Costs of Concurrent Task Engagement to Maintain Vigilance , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[11]  E. Muth,et al.  A questionnaire for the assessment of the multiple dimensions of motion sickness. , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[13]  M. Woodward,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Corinne Brusque,et al.  Drivers' adaptation to mobile phone use: Interaction strategies, consequences on driving behaviour and potential impact on road safety , 2013 .

[15]  Pietro Carlo Cacciabue.  Elements of Human-Machine Systems , 2004 .

[16]  George Kanellaidis,et al.  Drivers' Risk Perception of Road Design Elements , 2000 .

[17]  Yang-Kun Ou,et al.  Effects of Age and the Use of Hands-Free Cellular Phones on Driving Behavior and Task Performance , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Ben Desbrow,et al.  The Influence of Drinking, Texting, and Eating on Simulated Driving Performance , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[19]  Joel Hughes,et al.  Both Texting and Eating Are Associated With Impaired Simulated Driving Performance , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  Michael G Lenné,et al.  Driver distraction in an unusual environment: Effects of text-messaging in tunnels. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Maria T Schultheis,et al.  Driver Performance While Texting: Even a Little is Too Much , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[22]  Pushpa Choudhary,et al.  Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behaviour. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  John Richardson,et al.  Drivers' willingness to engage with their mobile phone: the influence of phone function and road demand , 2013 .

[24]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  Effects of phone type on driving and eye glance behaviour while text-messaging , 2014 .

[25]  Simon Washington,et al.  Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  R. Fuller,et al.  Iconography : Task difficulty and risk in the determination of driver behaviour , 2007 .

[27]  Simon Washington,et al.  A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Samuel G Charlton,et al.  Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Amanda N Stephens,et al.  Couples, contentious conversations, mobile telephone use and driving. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Neil K Chaudhary,et al.  The influence of roadway situation, other contextual factors, and driver characteristics on the prevalence of driver secondary behaviors , 2016 .

[31]  John A. Perrone,et al.  What’s the risk? A comparison of actual and perceived driving risk , 2014 .

[32]  Kevin Grove,et al.  Investigating Drivers’ Compensatory Behavior when Using a Mobile Device , 2017 .

[33]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Driving impairs talking , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[35]  Simon Washington,et al.  Revisiting the Task-Capability interface model for incorporating human factors into car-following models , 2015 .

[36]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[37]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[38]  Lynn B. Meuleners,et al.  A validation study of driving errors using a driving simulator , 2015 .

[39]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[40]  Kevin Grove,et al.  Compensatory Behavior of Drivers When Conversing on a Cell Phone , 2014 .

[41]  Mahmut Ekşioğlu,et al.  Steering-wheel grip force characteristics of drivers as a function of gender, speed, and road condition , 2008 .

[42]  Simon Washington,et al.  Gap Acceptance Behavior of Mobile Phone–Distracted Drivers at Roundabouts , 2016 .

[43]  Simon Washington,et al.  Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[44]  J He,et al.  Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry? , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[45]  Teena M. Garrison,et al.  Impact of Relevance and Distraction on Driving Performance and Visual Attention in a Simulated Driving Environment , 2013 .

[46]  Simon Washington,et al.  Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: Prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies , 2017, PloS one.

[47]  Bernhard Wandtner,et al.  The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[48]  Selen Turkay,et al.  The effects of whiteboard animations on retention and subjective experiences when learning advanced physics topics , 2016 .

[49]  Yili Liu,et al.  Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[50]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[51]  Simon Washington,et al.  Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review , 2016 .

[52]  Mark Asbridge,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[53]  Feng Guo,et al.  The Risk of a Safety-Critical Event Associated With Mobile Device Use in Specific Driving Contexts , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[54]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Factors Affecting Drivers’ Cell Phone Use Behavior , 2014 .

[55]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  A study of young adults examining phone dialing while driving using a touchscreen vs. a button style flip-phone , 2014 .

[56]  Simon Washington,et al.  Influence of road traffic environment and mobile phone distraction on the speed selection behaviour of young drivers , 2015 .