Size and transmural extent of first-time reperfused myocardial infarction assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance can be estimated by 12-lead electrocardiogram.

BACKGROUND The ability of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to quantify size and transmural extent of myocardial infarction (MI) is not fully explored. Q waves are still thought of as indicative of transmural MI despite that several studies have rejected this association. We hypothesized that size and transmural extent of acute MI indeed can be estimated by QRS scoring on the 12-lead ECG using delayed, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) as gold standard and that Q waves are not predictive of transmural MI. METHODS Twenty-nine patients with first-time reperfused MI were studied. Delayed, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed and 12-lead ECG was recorded 8 +/- 1 days after the acute event. Myocardial infarction size and transmurality were determined by DE-MRI and compared with Selvester QRS score from the ECG recorded on the same day. RESULTS There was a good correlation (r = 0.79, P < .001) between MI size by QRS scoring and DE-MRI. As local MI transmurality increased as assessed by DE-MRI, the local QRS score increased progressively (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the number of Q-wave-related QRS points between nontransmural and transmural MI (1.8 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9 +/- 0.4, P = .14). The global QRS score, however, differed significantly (3.1 +/- 0.8 vs 5.1 +/- 0.6, P < .05). CONCLUSION QRS score is significantly related to both MI size and transmurality by DE-MRI in patients with first-time reperfused MI. Presence of Q waves, however, is not indicative of transmural MI in these patients. Thus, QRS scoring could potentially be used for diagnosing and characterizing MI in patients with suspected recent MI.

[1]  Maythem Saeed,et al.  Reperfused myocardial infarctions on T1‐ and susceptibility‐enhanced MRI: Evidence for loss of compartmentalization of contrast media , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  J. De Sutter,et al.  The Selvester 32-point QRS score for evaluation of myocardial infarct size after primary coronary angioplasty. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  H. Tanaka,et al.  Use of the QRS scoring system in the early estimation of myocardial infarct size following reperfusion. , 1997, Journal of electrocardiology.

[4]  R. Ideker,et al.  Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. II. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for anterior infarcts. , 1982, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  K. Schechtman,et al.  The Influence of Location and Extent of Myocardial Infarction on Long-term Ventricular Dysrhythmia and Mortality , 1979, Circulation.

[6]  R. Kim,et al.  Transmural Extent of Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts Long-Term Improvement in Contractile Function , 2001, Circulation.

[7]  M. Maxwell,et al.  Studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. VI. The depolarization complex in pure subendocardial infarction; role of the subendocardial region in the normal electrocardiogram. , 1954, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  H. Pipberger,et al.  "Silent" subendocardial infarcts: fact or fiction? , 1980, American heart journal.

[9]  C. Higgins,et al.  Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo-planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99mTc-DTPA autoradiography in rats. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  G. Wagner,et al.  Determination of the left ventricular long‐axis orientation from a single short‐axis MR image: relation to BMI and age , 2004, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[11]  T. Denton,et al.  Comprehensive electrocardiology : theory and practice in health and disease , 1990 .

[12]  L. Shaw,et al.  Early and 1-year clinical outcome of patients' evolving non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results from The TIMI II Study. , 1995, Circulation.

[13]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[14]  R. Ideker,et al.  Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. III. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for inferior infarcts. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  M. Maxwell,et al.  Studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. VIII. The genesis of the coronary QS wave in through-and-through infarction. , 1954, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  R. Ideker,et al.  Correlation of Postmortem Anatomic Findings with Electrocardiographic Changes in Patients with Myocardial Infarction: Retrospective Study of Patients with Typical Anterior and Posterior Infarcts , 1977, Circulation.

[17]  B. Phibbs.  "Transmural" versus "subendocardial" myocardial infarction: an electrocardiographic myth. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  B. Sobel,et al.  Estimation of Infarct Size in Man and its Relation to Prognosis , 1972, Circulation.

[19]  F. Prato,et al.  Measurement of the extraction efficiency and distribution volume for Gd‐DTPA in normal and diseased canine myocardium , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  B. Sievers,et al.  How reliable is electrocardiography in differentiating transmural from non-transmural myocardial infarction? A study with contrast magnetic resonance imaging as gold standard. , 2004, International journal of cardiology.

[21]  David Oakes,et al.  Prognostic significance of nonfatal myocardial reinfarction , 1990 .

[22]  R. Jeremy,et al.  Electrocardiographic measurement of infarct size after thrombolytic therapy. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Richard D. White,et al.  Quantitative clinical assessment of chronic anterior myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and QRS scoring. , 2003, American heart journal.

[25]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Prognostic significance of location and type of myocardial infarction: independent adverse outcome associated with anterior location. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  D. Spodick.  Q-wave infarction versus S-T infarction. Nonspecificity of electrocardiographic criteria for differentiating transmural and nontransmural lesions. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  R E Ideker,et al.  Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. IV. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for posterolateral infarcts. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005 .

[30]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[31]  E. Heiberg.  Automated feature detection in multidimensional images , 2005 .

[32]  K. Lee,et al.  Identification of the optimal electrocardiographic leads for detecting acute epicardial injury in acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[34]  R E Ideker,et al.  Evaluation of a QRS Scoring System for Estimating Myocardial Infarct Size: I. Specificity and Observer Agreement , 1982, Circulation.

[35]  C. Lorenz,et al.  Measurement of the gadopentetate dimeglumine partition coefficient in human myocardium in vivo: normal distribution and elevation in acute and chronic infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[36]  J. Kastor,et al.  Myocardial changes associated with cardiogenic shock. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  L. Shaw,et al.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Clinical Indications for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (cmr): Consensus Panel Report , 2022 .

[38]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.