Integrating environmental impact assessment into new product development and processing-technology selection: Milk concentrates as substitutes for milk powders

Abstract Environmental-impact reduction potential is great early in new product development. To exploit this potential, this study evaluates novel combinations of existent processing technologies. Process engineering is combined with an environmental product assessment along the supply chain. In the dairy sector, drying milk into milk powders is a highly energy-intensive process. This study investigates whether switching from milk powders to new products known as milk concentrates diminishes the overall environmental impact along the supply chains of dairy-containing products. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted, which considers individual processing steps that can be combined and operated in various ways to generate a multitude of different skim milk concentrates. For relevant environmental indicators such as cumulative energy demand, global warming potential, eutrophication potential, and acidification potential, concentrates were found to have a lower environmental impact than powders, even if the former are trucked up to 1000 km. This break-even distance is a conservative estimate. It depends upon the environmental impact of raw-milk production. The concentrate with the lowest environmental impact is produced by a combined concentration with reverse osmosis and evaporation to a dry-matter content of 35% and preservation via subsequent pasteurization. This holds for all indicators except eutrophication potential, for which this concentrate is the second-best option. This study identifies the frame within which milk concentrates are an advantageous substitution for milk powder and demonstrates the value of applying environmental assessment to product development and processing-technology selection.

[1]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle Assessment and its Application to Process Selection, Design and Optimisation , 1999 .

[2]  Julie B Zimmerman,et al.  Combinatorial life cycle assessment to inform process design of industrial production of algal biodiesel. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  I.J.M. de Boer,et al.  Eco-efficiency in the production chain of Dutch semi-hard cheese , 2011 .

[4]  U. Kulozik,et al.  Heat stability of concentrated skim milk as a function of heating time and temperature on a laboratory scale – Improved methodology and kinetic relationship , 2015 .

[5]  A. Ahsan,et al.  Environmental performance and energy recovery potential of five processes for municipal solid waste treatment , 2015 .

[6]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production , 2008 .

[7]  Savvas A. Tassou,et al.  Food transport refrigeration – Approaches to reduce energy consumption and environmental impacts of road transport , 2009 .

[8]  J. Pedersen,et al.  A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula , 1991 .

[9]  Elena Rosa Domínguez,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the cogeneration processes in the Cuban sugar industry , 2013 .

[10]  O. Jolliet,et al.  A biophysical approach to allocation of life cycle environmental burdens for fluid milk supply chain analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Joris Flapper,et al.  Reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from global dairy processing facilities , 2011 .

[12]  U. Kulozik,et al.  Heat-induced coagulation of concentrated skim milk heated by direct steam injection , 2016 .

[13]  L. Ciacci,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment comparison of two ways for acrylonitrile production: the SOHIO process and an alternative route using propane , 2014 .

[14]  Caroline Sablayrolles,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the process industry: a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  From fluid milk to milk powder: Energy use and energy efficiency in the European dairy industry , 2006 .

[16]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Concepts for further sustainable production of foods , 2016 .

[17]  Jaime Zufía,et al.  Life cycle assessment of food-preservation technologies , 2012 .

[18]  I. Tomasevic,et al.  Environmental life-cycle assessment of various dairy products , 2014 .

[19]  Dominique Millet,et al.  Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs , 2007 .

[20]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions of packaged fluid milk production in Tehran , 2014 .

[21]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of a dairy product: the yoghurt , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[23]  D. Huntzinger,et al.  A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies , 2009 .

[24]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  Global warming potential associated with dairy products in the Republic of Ireland , 2017 .

[25]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments , 2010 .

[26]  A. Flysjö Potential for improving the carbon footprint of butter and blend products. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  D Maxime,et al.  Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  A review of methodological issues affecting LCA of novel food products , 2010 .

[29]  M. T. Knudsen,et al.  Parameters affecting the environmental impact of a range of dairy farming systems in Denmark, Germany and Italy , 2013 .