Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Treated with Radiation and Temozolomide in Research Studies in the United States

Purpose: Novel agents are currently combined with radiation and temozolomide (RT + TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma using overall survival as the primary end point. Results of these phase II studies are typically compared with the phase III European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) survival data that resulted in RT + TMZ becoming standard therapy. Experimental Design: The New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) Consortium assigned 365 patients with glioblastoma to four single-cohort studies with similar eligibility criteria. Patients received RT + TMZ with talampanel (n = 72), poly-ICLC (n = 97), or cilengitide (n = 112) or RT + TMZ alone with monitoring of CD4 counts (n = 84). Overall survival of those ages 18 to 70 years with glioblastoma was compared with published EORTC data. Results: NABTT and EORTC patients had comparable performance status and debulking surgery. Median, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates for the EORTC patients (n = 287) and the comparable NABTT patients receiving RT + TMZ and novel agents (n = 244) are 14.6 versus 19.6 months, 61% versus 81%, and 27% versus 37%, respectively. This represents a 37% reduction in odds of death (P < 0.0001) through 2 years of follow-up. NABTT and EORTC patients receiving only RT + TMZ had similar survival. Conclusions: Newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated recently with RT + TMZ and talampanel, poly-ICLC, or cilengitide had significantly longer survival than similar patients treated with only RT + TMZ accrued internationally from 2000 to 2002. These differences could result from the novel agents or changing patterns of care. Until the reasons for these different survival rates are clarified, comparisons of outcomes from phase II studies with published RT + TMZ survival data should be interpreted with caution. Clin Cancer Res; 16(8); 2443–9. ©2010 AACR.

[1]  R. Kay The Analysis of Survival Data , 2012 .

[2]  P. Gutin,et al.  Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastoma , 2009, Neurology.

[3]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[4]  P. Wen,et al.  Antiangiogenic therapies for high-grade glioma , 2009, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[5]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Talampanel with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a multicenter phase II trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Cairncross,et al.  Population-Based Study of Pseudoprogression after Chemoradiotherapy in GBM , 2009, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[8]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase II study of erlotinib plus temozolomide during and after radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme or gliosarcoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Uhm MGMT Promoter Methylation Status Can Predict the Incidence and Outcome of Pseudoprogression After Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients , 2009 .

[11]  Santosh Kesari,et al.  Malignant gliomas in adults. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  P. Wen,et al.  Phase II study of temozolomide, thalidomide, and celecoxib for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[13]  Dieta Brandsma,et al.  Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  A. Brandes,et al.  MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Grossman Arguments against the routine use of currently available adjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade gliomas. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  Z. Ram,et al.  A phase 3 trial of local chemotherapy with biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers (Gliadel wafers) in patients with primary malignant glioma. , 2003, Neuro-oncology.

[18]  Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative , 2003 .

[19]  N. Laperriere,et al.  Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic review. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  L. Stewart,et al.  Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  Brem,et al.  The New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) CNS Consortium: Organization, Objectives, and Activities. , 1998, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.