The structure of political discussion networks: a model for the analysis of online deliberation

This paper shows that online political discussion networks are, on average, wider and deeper than the networks generated by other types of discussions: they engage a larger number of participants and cascade through more levels of nested comments. Using data collected from the Slashdot forum, this paper reconstructs the discussion threads as hierarchical networks and proposes a model for their comparison and classification. In addition to the substantive topic of discussion, which corresponds to the different sections of the forum (such as Developers, Games, or Politics), we classify the threads according to structural features like the maximum number of comments at any level of the network (i.e. the width) and the number of nested layers in the network (i.e. the depth). We find that political discussion networks display a tendency to cluster around the area that corresponds to wider and deeper structures, showing a significant departure from the structure exhibited by other types of discussions. We propose using this model to create a framework that allows the analysis and comparison of different internet technologies for the promotion of political deliberation.

[1]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[2]  Christian Rostboll,et al.  On Deliberative Democracy , 2001 .

[3]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[4]  C. Pateman.  Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[5]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[6]  Dennis Davis,et al.  Democracy and deliberation , 1999 .

[7]  Peter M. Shane,et al.  Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet , 2004 .

[8]  Bernard Manin,et al.  On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation , 1987 .

[9]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[10]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies , 2007 .

[11]  Vicenç Gómez,et al.  Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in slashdot , 2008, WWW.

[12]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Contents , 2003 .

[13]  Diana C. Mutz.  The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[14]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[15]  Casey A. Klofstad.  How Discussions about Politics and Current Events Increase Civic Participation , 2007 .

[16]  Lincoln Dahlberg.  The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[17]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[18]  Casey A. Klofstad.  Talk Leads to Recruitment , 2007 .

[19]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Democracy in an IT-framed society: introduction , 2001, CACM.

[20]  Dennis F. Thompson.  Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science , 2008 .

[21]  Ted Becker.  Rating the impact of new technologies on democracy , 2001, CACM.

[22]  B. Barber.  Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy , 1998 .

[23]  Pamela Paxton.  Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Alexander Halavais,et al.  The slashdot effect : analysis of a large-scale public conversation on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[25]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation , 1998 .

[26]  J. Habermas.  Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[27]  Josep Blat,et al.  Homogeneous Temporal Activity Patterns in a Large Online Communication Space , 2007, SAW.

[28]  Kevin Fredette,et al.  Electronic democracy: Using the internet to influence american politics , 1997 .

[29]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[30]  Adam Meirowitz,et al.  Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy , 2009 .

[31]  A. Zuckerman.  The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior , 2005 .

[32]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space , 2004, CHI.

[33]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[34]  Per-Olof Ågren.  Is online democracy in the EU for professionals only? , 2001, CACM.

[35]  Andrew Ó. Baoill.  Slashdot and the Public Sphere , 2000, First Monday.

[36]  J. Klein.  Deliberation Day , 2005 .

[37]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Democracy in an IT-framed society , 2001 .

[38]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  A New Agenda for e-Democracy , 2005 .

[39]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[40]  Reid Hastie,et al.  What Happened on Deliberation Day? , 2006 .

[41]  G. Browning.  Electronic Democracy , 1996 .

[42]  R. Krimmer,et al.  Towards the enhancement of e‐democracy: identifying the notion of the ‘middleman paradox’ , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  Nathaniel Poor,et al.  Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[44]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[45]  Diana C. Mutz.  Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory , 2008 .

[46]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .