Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures

Three measures of actors' network centrality are derived from an elementary rocess model of social influence. The measures are closely related to, and cast new light on, widely used measures of actors' centrality; for example, the essential social organization of status that has been assumed by Hubbell, Bonacich, Coleman, and Burt appears as a deducible outcome of this social influence process. Unlike previous measures, which have been viewed as competing alternatives, the present measures are complementary and, in their juxtaposition, provide for a rich description of social structure. The complementary indicates a degree of theoretical unification in the work on network centrality that was heretofore unsuspected.

[1]  Alex Bavelas.  A Mathematical Model for Group Structures , 1948 .

[2]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[3]  K. Lewin.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[4]  H. Leavitt.  Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[6]  J. French.  A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychology Review.

[7]  C. Coombs.  A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[8]  John G. Kemeny,et al.  Finite Markov Chains. , 1960 .

[9]  Irving Louis Horowitz,et al.  Consensus, Conflict and Cooperation: A Sociological Inventory , 1962 .

[10]  M. A. Beauchamp.  AN IMPROVED INDEX OF CENTRALITY. , 1965, Behavioral science.

[11]  Charles H. Hubbell.  An Input-Output Approach to Clique Identification , 1965 .

[12]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[13]  B. A. Farbey,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1966 .

[14]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[15]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. , 1971 .

[16]  P. Bonacich.  Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[17]  J. Coleman.  The mathematics of collective action , 1973 .

[18]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[19]  K. Ord.  Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction , 1975 .

[20]  John G. Kemeny,et al.  Finite Markov chains , 1960 .

[21]  J. French,et al.  A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychological review.

[22]  Carl G. Wagner,et al.  Consensus through respect: A model of rational group decision-making , 1978 .

[23]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[24]  Mark Granovetter,et al.  CHAPTER 24 – THE THEORY-GAP IN SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS1 , 1979 .

[25]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in social networks: ii. experimental results☆ , 1979 .

[26]  L. Erbring,et al.  Individuals and Social Structure , 1979 .

[27]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality , 1980 .

[28]  P. Doreian.  Estimating Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data , 1981 .

[29]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks , 1982 .

[30]  R. Burt.  Toward a structural theory of action , 1982 .

[31]  K. Cook,et al.  The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  B. Wellman.  Network Analysis: Some Basic Principles , 1983 .

[33]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Restricted Access in Networks and Models of Power , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  J. Ord,et al.  Spatial Processes: Models and Applications , 1984 .

[35]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[36]  Edward O. Laumann,et al.  Mathematical ideas in social structural analysis , 1984 .

[37]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  What is peer group influence , 1985 .

[38]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  Techniques for Disaggregating Centrality Scores in Social Networks , 1986 .

[39]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[40]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Measuring Relative Standing in Small Groups and Bounded Social Networks , 1986 .

[41]  K. Cook,et al.  Point and Line Vulnerability as Bases for Predicting the Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Reply to Willer , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  David Willer.  Vulnerability and the Location of Power Positions: Comment on Cook, Emerson, Gillmore, and Yamagishi , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Progress, problems and prospects for network research: Investigating relationships in the age of electronic communication technologies , 1987 .

[46]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Some properties of structural equivalence measures derived from sociometric choice data , 1988 .

[47]  J. Bolland,et al.  Sorting out centrality: An analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks , 1988 .

[48]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[49]  David Willer,et al.  Power Relations in Exchange Networks , 1988 .

[50]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[51]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social influence and opinions , 1990 .

[52]  SNAPS (Social Network Analysis Procedures) for GAUSS , 1990 .

[53]  Noah E. Friedkin.  A Guttman scale for the strength of an interpersonal tie , 1990 .