Evaluation of interpupillary distance in the Turkish population

Purpose The aim of this study was to report normative values and ranges of interpupillary distance (IPD) in different age groups of a Turkish population. Methods A total of 756 healthy subjects were included in this prospective study. After a complete ophthalmic evaluation, subjects were divided into four age groups to assess differences between age groups in relation to IPD. The age groups were 20–30, 31–50, 51–70, and 71–89 years. Far IPD measurements were performed using an autorefractometer (Topcon RM-8800). Results The mean age was 48.42±20.55 years, ranging from 19 to 89 years. The mean IPD was calculated as 62.5±4.1 mm (range 49–76). The mean IPD value was observed to be significantly higher among males compared to females (P<0.001). The difference among groups in terms of mean IPD was statistically significant (P<0.001). IPD increased by 4.19 mm in males and 3.11 mm in females from the young adults (20–30 years) to older adults (51–70 years), and then a decrease (2.6 and 0.19 mm for males and females, respectively) occurred between 70 and 89 years of age. Conclusion The current study offers the population-specific normative data on far IPD in different age groups. Our study showed that sex and age had a significant effect on IPD. Knowledge of normal values in this population subgroup may be useful in studying orbito-cranial growth patterns, syndrome diagnosis, surgical management of cranio-facial deformities and trauma, and manufactures of optical frames and lenses.

[1]  R. C. Juberg,et al.  Normal values for intercanthal distances of 5- to 11-year-old American blacks. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[2]  Young-Woo Suh,et al.  Clinical research on the ophthalmic factors affecting 3D asthenopia. , 2012, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[3]  R. Hong,et al.  [The measurement of normal values of exophthalmos, interpupillary distance and interorbital distance of children and adolescence in Xiamen and the rule of their development]. , 2000, [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  H G Bogren,et al.  Normal variations of the position of the eye in the orbit. , 1986, Ophthalmology.

[5]  R. Pandey,et al.  NORMAL VALUES FOR INNER INTERCANTHAL, INTERPUPILLARY, AND OUTER INTERCANTHAL DISTANCES IN THE INDIAN POPULATION , 2003, International journal of clinical practice.

[6]  Leila Rezaei,et al.  Normal Interpupillary Distance Values in an Iranian Population , 2012, Journal of ophthalmic & vision research.

[7]  E. Irving,et al.  Accuracy and Repeatability of Self-Measurement of Interpupillary Distance , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  E. Osuobeni,et al.  Differences between anatomical and physiological interpupillary distance. , 1994, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[9]  A. L. Anderson Accurate clinical means of measuring intervisual axis distance. , 1955, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Pointer,et al.  The interpupillary distance in adult Caucasian subjects, with reference to ‘readymade’ reading spectacle centration , 2012, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  H. Howland,et al.  Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[12]  S. Doğanay,et al.  Interpupillary index: a new parameter for hypo-hypertelorism. , 2001, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[13]  U. Osuagwu,et al.  Influence of age on measured anatomical and physiological interpupillary distance (far and near), and near heterophoria, in Arab males , 2013, Clinical ophthalmology.

[14]  H. Fledelius,et al.  Changes in eye position during growth and adult life , 1986, Acta ophthalmologica.

[15]  J. Siderov,et al.  Repeatability of measurements of interpupillary distance , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics.

[16]  E. Osuobeni,et al.  Gender Differences in Interpupillary Distance among Arabs , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  Surendra B. Patil,et al.  Anthropometry of the eyelid and palpebral fissure in an Indian population. , 2011, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[18]  F. Tsai,et al.  Normal values of inner canthal distance, interpupillary distance and palpebral fissure length in normal Chinese children in Taiwan. , 2000, Acta paediatrica Taiwanica = Taiwan er ke yi xue hui za zhi.