Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from a high temperature electrolysis process coupled to a high temperature gas nuclear reactor

Abstract The life cycle analysis (LCA) is a versatile tool to evaluate process and production systems, and is useful to compare environmental burdens. For the purposes of this LCA, a high temperature electrolysis process was coupled to a high temperature gas nuclear reactor. The system function is the production of hydrogen using electricity and heat from nuclear power, with a functional unit of 1 kg of hydrogen, at the plant gate. The product system consists of the following steps: (i) the extraction and manufacturing of raw materials (upstream flows), (ii) the electrolytic cell fabrication, (iii) the nuclear fuel cycle, and, (iv) the hydrogen production plant. Particular attention was paid to those processes where there was limited information available on inventory data, for example mining and processing of rare earth metals, and electrolytic cell assembly, which are the primary components of a hydrogen generation plant. The environmental impact assessment focuses on the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), as related to global warming. Additionally, other environmental loads, to complete the environmental profile of the product system, were included. The results were low GHGs emissions, with a value of 416 g of CO2eq kg-1H2. As to the process components, the electrolytic cell showed the highest environmental impact.

[1]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuel cell-based APUs , 2005 .

[2]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment , 2000 .

[3]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Metrics of Climate Change: Assessing Radiative Forcing and Emission Indices , 2003 .

[4]  Li Zhao,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis of Ceramic Anode-Supported SOFC System Manufacturing Processes , 2012, ECS Transactions.

[5]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Value Choices in Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Stressors Causing Human Health Damage , 2011 .

[6]  N. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Extractive metallurgy of rare earths , 1992 .

[7]  R. Vijayalakshmi,et al.  Processing of xenotime concentrate by sulphuric acid digestion and selective thorium precipitation for separation of rare earths , 2001 .

[8]  Vivek Utgikar,et al.  Global warming potential of the sulfur–iodine process using life cycle assessment methodology , 2009 .

[9]  Juan-Luis François,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gases emission analysis of hydrogen production from S–I thermochemical process coupled to a high temperature nuclear reactor , 2012 .

[10]  B. Kenney.  An Experimental and Modelling Study of Oxygen Reduction in Porous LSM/YSZ Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathodes , 2010 .

[11]  Christian Solli,et al.  Fission or Fossil?: A Comparative Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment of Two Different Hydrogen Production Methods , 2004 .

[12]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  The environmental impact of manufacturing planar and tubular solid oxide fuel cells , 2001 .

[13]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  A comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a Cu–Cl cycle , 2011 .

[14]  I. Dincer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using multi-step Cu–Cl cycles , 2012 .

[15]  J. O'brien,et al.  Large Scale Hydrogen Production From Nuclear Energy Using High Temperature Electrolysis , 2010 .

[16]  G. Schiller,et al.  High temperature water electrolysis using metal supported solid oxide electrolyser cells (SOEC) , 2009 .

[17]  K. R. Long,et al.  The Principal Rare Earth Elements Deposits of the United States: A Summary of Domestic Deposits and a Global Perspective , 2010 .

[18]  Joyce Smith Cooper,et al.  Taxonomies of SOFC material and manufacturing alternatives , 2005 .

[19]  I. Dincer,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of nuclear assisted hydrogen production via Cu–Cl thermochemical cycles , 2013 .

[20]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergetic life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from renewables , 2007 .

[21]  D. Blumberga,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of three biohydrogen pathways. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[22]  T. M. Bachmann,et al.  Life cycle assessment of H2 generation with high temperature electrolysis , 2013 .

[23]  B. Yildiz,et al.  Degradation Issues in Solid Oxide Cells During High Temperature Electrolysis , 2010 .

[24]  V. Utgikar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production via nuclear energy , 2006 .

[25]  Carl M. Stoots,et al.  Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy via High Temperature Electrolysis , 2006 .

[26]  Y. Zhai,et al.  Preparation of NiO-YSZ composite powder by a combustion method and its application for cathode of SOEC , 2010 .

[27]  I. Dincer,et al.  Comparative environmental impact and efficiency assessment of selected hydrogen production methods , 2013 .

[28]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel production processes , 2004 .

[29]  Carl M. Stoots,et al.  HIGH-TEMPERATURE ELECTROLYSIS FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM NUCLEAR ENERGY , 2005 .

[30]  James E. O'Brien,et al.  Optimized Flow Sheet for a Reference Commercial-Scale Nuclear-Driven High-Temperature Electrolysis Hydrogen Production Plant , 2007 .

[31]  M. Mann,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Hydrogen Production via Wind/Electrolysis , 2004 .

[32]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[33]  J. O’Brien,et al.  Parametric evaluation of large-scale high-temperature electrolysis hydrogen production using different advanced nuclear reactor heat sources , 2009 .

[34]  R. Banerjee,et al.  Comparison of biohydrogen production processes , 2008 .