Improving users’ product acceptability: an approach based on Bayesian networks and a simulated annealing algorithm

Developing products that are properly suited to users’ needs and preferences in order to be accepted is one of the main challenges designers and engineers face constantly. Evaluating and improving users’ product acceptability has become an important research question. Many approaches leave the acceptability evaluation question for the last phases of the New Product Development process (NPD), when an almost finished prototype is available and when there is no time left for important modifications. In the early phase of the NPD process, the project managers need models and methods to evaluate the potential acceptability of the new concept and if required, to define actions to improve this concept. In this paper, a method with two main goals is proposed to tackle this problem. Its first goal consists in evaluating an index of users’ product acceptability. When this index is too low, the second goal concerns the optimal selection of the most appropriate actions (improvement scenario) to increase this previously assessed index and to optimise the supplementary cost. As information collected from users in the early phase is subject to uncertainty, the proposed method exploits the inference properties of Bayesian networks making it possible to make useful estimations of the acceptability index. Furthermore, the improvement scenarios are composed of actions that make it possible to improve different criteria composing the users’ acceptability index. The improvement problem is formulated as an optimisation problem to be solved by a simulated annealing algorithm. In order to illustrate its interest, the proposed method is applied to a real case concerning the design of a medical-stocking threading device.

[1]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[3]  W. Gruen Preference for new products and its relationship to different measures of conformity. , 1960 .

[4]  Yves Crama,et al.  Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[6]  Giovanny Arbelaez-Garces,et al.  Towards a method for acceptability analysis: Application to healthcare innovation , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE).

[7]  Ashraf Elazouni,et al.  Estimating the Acceptability of New Formwork Systems Using Neural Networks , 2005 .

[8]  Jingjing Lu,et al.  An empirical comparison between nonlinear programming optimization and simulated annealing (SA) algorithm under a higher moments bayesian portfolio selection framework , 2007, 2007 Winter Simulation Conference.

[9]  M. Brosnan Modeling technophobia: a case for word processing , 1999 .

[10]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Usability Engineering Lifecycle , 1993 .

[11]  Adnan Darwiche,et al.  Inference in belief networks: A procedural guide , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[12]  Hsu-Pin Wang,et al.  Modified simulated annealing for multiple-objective engineering design optimization , 1992, J. Intell. Manuf..

[13]  Christopher Durugbo,et al.  Strategic framework for industrial product-service co-design: findings from the microsystems industry , 2014 .

[14]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[15]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Anatomy of Prototypes , 2010 .

[16]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Power, Perception and Performance: From Usability Engineering to Technology Acceptance with the P3 Model of User Response , 1999 .

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Feng Zhou,et al.  An improved user experience model with cumulative prospect theory , 2013, CSER.

[19]  Vincent Boly,et al.  A New Methodology Based on Kano Model for the Evaluation of a New Product Acceptability during the Front-End Phases , 2008, 2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[20]  M. Pirlot General local search methods , 1996 .

[21]  Sungwon Kang,et al.  A method to optimize the scope of a software product platform based on end-user features , 2014, J. Syst. Softw..

[22]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[23]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[24]  Erik Kaestner,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 2016 .

[25]  Feng Zhou,et al.  Prospect-Theoretic Modeling of Customer Affective-Cognitive Decisions Under Uncertainty for User Experience Design , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[26]  Pin Luarn,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[27]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Mauricio Camargo,et al.  Studying the implications and impact of smartphones on self-directed learning under a Living Lab approach , 2012 .

[29]  Éric Zamaï,et al.  Towards Bayesian network methodology for predicting the equipment health factor of complex semiconductor systems , 2013 .

[30]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[31]  S. D. Jenkins,et al.  Comparing Thermographic, EEG, and Subjective Measures of Affective Experience During Simulated Product Interactions , 2009 .

[32]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  A methodology of integrating affective design with defining engineering specifications for product design , 2015 .

[33]  Xingda Qu,et al.  Affect prediction from physiological measures via visual stimuli , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Constrained Parameter Optimization Problems , 1996, Evolutionary Computation.

[35]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[36]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  The new product design ‐ a transverse approach , 2000 .

[37]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[38]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[39]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[40]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  Mauricio Camargo,et al.  A fuzzy integral based methodology to elicit semantic spaces in usability tests , 2014 .

[42]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[43]  Chwen-Tzeng Su,et al.  Constructing intelligent model for acceptability evaluation of a product , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Danilo Corrêa Silva,et al.  Evaluation of reusable cardboard box designs: Biomechanical and perceptual aspects , 2013 .

[45]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Understanding Acceptance of High Technology Products: 50 Years of Research , 2006 .