Novel polycarbonate-based polyurethane elastomers: Composition–property relationship

Abstract Novel all-aliphatic polycarbonate-based polyurethane (PC-PU) elastomers, as well as PC-PU nanocomposites filled with organic-modified clays were synthesized, characterized and studied. It was found that they have very attractive mechanical properties (e.g., elongation at break between 600% and 800%). The prepared PC-PUs possess a distinctly segmented structure, which is the key prerequisite for their behavior as strong physical rubbery networks. All synthesized materials melt at elevated temperatures (between 110 and 200 °C) and hence can be processed like normal thermoplastics. The dispersion of the clay nanofiller was achieved by its one day swelling in the alcohol and a brief successive stirring. This procedure is very successful and leads to a partial exfoliation of the clay (documented by X-ray diffraction and TEM). The best nanocomposites with very good tensile properties, particularly with significantly increased moduli were obtained using the bentonite nanofiller. The study shows that the nanofiller interacts strongly with the hard domains and influences their melting temperature (DMTA and DSC), but it does not affect the glass transition temperature of soft domains. While Cloisite 15A was found to interact preferentially with the hard domains, the organic modified bentonite shows a strong interaction with both soft and hard segments, behaving as a blending agent. Hard domains in neat matrices, formed by hydrogen bonding of hard segments, were practically invisible by X-ray or TEM, but were successfully detected by AFM. Besides excellent mechanical properties, the prepared elastomers and their nanocomposites showed an interesting phase behavior (which was studied by combining DMTA and modulated DSC).

[1]  R. Cameron,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part I: materials selection and evaluation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[2]  K. Kojio,et al.  Structure-Mechanical Property Relationships for Poly(carbonate urethane) Elastomers with Novel Soft Segments , 2009 .

[3]  K. Kojio,et al.  Effect of side groups of polymer glycol on microphase‐separated structure and mechanical properties of polyurethane elastomers , 2008 .

[4]  Stanisław Pikus,et al.  The synthesis and characterization of new thermoplastic poly(carbonate-urethane) elastomers derived from HDI and aliphatic–aromatic chain extenders , 2009 .

[5]  K. Kojio,et al.  Effect of the composition ratio of copolymerized poly(carbonate) glycol on the microphase‐separated structures and mechanical properties of polyurethane elastomers , 2004 .

[6]  G. Wilkes,et al.  Structure–property relationships of poly(urethane urea)s with ultra‐low monol content poly(propylene glycol) soft segments. I. Influence of soft segment molecular weight and hard segment content , 2002 .

[7]  Garth L. Wilkes,et al.  A systematic series of 'model' PTMO based segmented polyurethanes reinvestigated using atomic force microscopy , 2003 .

[8]  Hideho Tanaka,et al.  Mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethanes containing aliphatic polycarbonate soft segments with different chemical structures , 2002 .

[9]  Jelena Pavličević,et al.  The influence of montmorillonite and bentonite addition on thermal properties of polyurethanes based on aliphatic polycarbonate diols , 2010 .

[10]  Jintang Guo,et al.  Study on structure and performance of polycarbonate urethane synthesized via different copolymerization methods , 2007 .

[11]  M. Šlouf,et al.  Structural and Surface Properties of Novel Polyurethane Films , 2009 .

[12]  P. Painter,et al.  Hydrogen bonding in polymers. 2. Infrared temperature studies of nylon 11 , 1986 .

[13]  A. Karbach,et al.  Atomic force microscopy—a powerful tool for industrial applications , 1999 .

[14]  R. Guidoin,et al.  Chemical stability of polyether urethanes versus polycarbonate urethanes. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  M. Špírková,et al.  The Influence of Macrodiol Type on the Mechanical Properties of Polyurethane Materials , 2009 .

[16]  R. Cameron,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part II: in vivo investigation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[17]  Y. Fukahori “Mechanism of the self-reinforcement of cross-linked NR generated through the strain-induced crystallization” , 2010 .

[18]  K. Kojio,et al.  The Microphase-separated Structure of Polyurethane Bulk and Thin Films , 2009 .

[19]  K. Caba,et al.  Structure–property relationships of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers based on polycarbonate diols , 2008 .

[20]  Nagore Gabilondo,et al.  Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomers Based on Polycarbonate Diols With Different Soft Segment Molecular Weight and Chemical Structure: Mechanical and Thermal Properties , 2008 .

[21]  Paul C. Painter,et al.  Hydrogen bonding in polymers. 4. Infrared temperature studies of a simple polyurethane , 1986 .

[22]  I. Chung,et al.  Structure-property relationships of hydroxy-terminated polyether based polyurethane network , 2008 .

[23]  G. Wilkes,et al.  Structure–property relationships of poly(urethane–urea)s with ultra-low monol content poly(propylene glycol) soft segments. Part II. Influence of low molecular weight polyol components , 2002 .