Anodal tDCS Over Wernicke’s Area Improves Verbal Memory and Prevents the Interference Effect During Words Learning

Background: Wernicke’s area is a key component of the cortical language network, and it is functionally related to the comprehension of oral and written language. In addition to its main role in the perception of language, some other functions related to verbal learning also seem to involve the activity of this cortical region. It is unknown whether different degrees of neuromodulation on this area determine its effect on word learning. Objective: We aimed to analyze the influence of the application of anodal transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) over Wernicke’s area at two different intensities on word learning. Method: We compared the effect of anodal tDCS at an intensity of 0.5 mA and 1.5 mA with sham tDCS, separately in different groups, on performance in a word learning and recall task. Results: The results show that 1.5 mA anodal tDCS improved performance. The number of words learned in this condition was higher compared with stimulation at 0.5 mA current strength and sham stimulation. Furthermore, stimulation with 1.5 mA specifically prevented the interference effect over word learning, compared to the other two tDCS conditions. Conclusions: These results show an intensity-dependent effect of anodal tDCS on verbal memory formation. These findings are discussed in the context of the various functions of Wernicke’s area and the ability of tDCS to modulate the activity and functionality of this cortical area at different intensities.

[1]  María Jesús Benedet,et al.  TAVEC: test de aprendizaje verbal España-Complutense : manual , 1998 .

[2]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  Differential involvement of the left frontal and temporal regions in verb naming: a tDCS treatment study. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[3]  D. Edwards,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Poststroke Aphasia Recovery , 2017, Stroke.

[4]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  tDCS stimulation segregates words in the brain: evidence from aphasia , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  P. Black,et al.  Three Models of Human Language , 1986, Neurosurgery.

[6]  J. Binder Current Controversies on Wernicke’s Area and its Role in Language , 2017, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[7]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation—A transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Julie M. Baker Using transcranial direct current stimulation to treat aphasia , 2009 .

[11]  P. Marangolo,et al.  Use of tDCS in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of the Behavioral Interventions Implemented With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Language Recovery. , 2016, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[12]  T. Ilić,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  J. J. González-Henríquez,et al.  Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Alberto Priori,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[15]  D. Wechsler WAIS-R manual : Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised , 1981 .

[16]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  Josef P. Rauschecker,et al.  Wernicke’s area revisited: Parallel streams and word processing , 2013, Brain and Language.

[18]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Parietal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates primary motor cortex excitability , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[22]  Ludovica Labruna,et al.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after‐effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  J. Binder,et al.  Neuroanatomy of language processing studied with functional MRI. , 1997, Clinical neuroscience.

[24]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[25]  R. Graves,et al.  The legacy of the Wernicke-Lichtheim model. , 1997, Journal of the history of the neurosciences.

[26]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[27]  Roy H. Hamilton,et al.  Individualized treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to stroke , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[28]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Reliable individual-level neural markers of high-level language processing: A necessary precursor for relating neural variability to behavioral and genetic variability , 2016, NeuroImage.

[29]  Julie M. Baker,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Naming Reaction Time in Fluent Aphasia: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study , 2011, Stroke.

[30]  S. Knecht,et al.  Short-Term Anomia Training and Electrical Brain Stimulation , 2011, Stroke.

[31]  Dang Khoa Nguyen,et al.  Verbal memory and verbal fluency tasks used for language localization and lateralization during magnetoencephalography , 2016, Epilepsy Research.

[32]  Il-Young Jung,et al.  The Factors Associated with Good Responses to Speech Therapy Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Aphasic Patients , 2011, Annals of rehabilitation medicine.

[33]  Lars A. Ross,et al.  Improved proper name recall by electrical stimulation of the anterior temporal lobes , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  The role of language in multi-dimensional categorization: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation and exposure to verbal labels , 2014, Brain and Language.

[35]  T. Kammer,et al.  Both anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation improves semantic processing , 2017, Neuroscience.

[36]  R. Lindenberg,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  Gesa Hartwigsen,et al.  The neurophysiology of language: Insights from non-invasive brain stimulation in the healthy human brain , 2015, Brain and Language.

[38]  Marian E. Berryhill,et al.  Enhanced long-term memory encoding after parietal neurostimulation , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  J. Peña,et al.  [Comparison of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III and the Spain-Complutense Verbal Learning Test in acquired brain injury: construct validity and ecological validity]. , 2017, Revista de neurologia.

[40]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Is neural hyperpolarization by cathodal stimulation always detrimental at the behavioral level? , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[41]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Valentina Fiori,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Word Retrieval in Healthy and Nonfluent Aphasic Subjects , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Direct current stimulation over MT+/V5 modulates motion aftereffect in humans , 2004, Neuroreport.

[44]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  R. Osu,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Audioverbal Memory in Stroke Patients , 2017, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[47]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Is Motor Learning Mediated by tDCS Intensity? , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  Andrew K. Martin,et al.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neural Networks in Young and Older Adults , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  tDCS stimulation segregates words in the brain , 2013 .

[51]  S. Cappa,et al.  Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[52]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Byron Bernal,et al.  How Localized are Language Brain Areas? A Review of Brodmann Areas Involvement in Oral Language. , 2016, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[55]  Colleen K. Loo,et al.  Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[56]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  tDCS Over the Motor Cortex Shows Differential Effects on Action and Object Words in Associative Word Learning in Healthy Aging , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[57]  Christian Plewnia,et al.  Controlling the Emotional Bias: Performance, Late Positive Potentials, and the Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[58]  E. Chang,et al.  Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[59]  Socrates Dokos,et al.  Focalised stimulation using high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to investigate declarative verbal learning and memory functioning , 2015, NeuroImage.

[60]  A. Flöel,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on neural processing in post‐stroke aphasia , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[61]  M. Lavidor,et al.  Modulating lexical and semantic processing by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  C. Price The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Ingrid R. Olson,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Verbal Working Memory Training Performance over Time and Near Transfer Outcomes , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.