th International Conference on Information Fusion ( FUSION ) An Evidential Model of Multisensor Decision Fusion for Force Aggregation and Classification

This paper describes airborne sensor networks for target detection and identification in military applications. One challenge is how to process and aggregate data from many sensor sources to generate an accurate and timely picture of the battlefield. The majority of research in data fusion has focused primarily on level 1 fusion, e.g., using multisensor data to determine the position, velocity, attributes, and identity of individual targets. In this paper we present a novel approach to military force aggregation and classification using the mathematical theory of evidence and doctrinal templates. Our approach helps commanders understand operational pictures of the battlefield, e.g., enemy force levels and deployment, and make better decisions than adversaries in the battlefield. A simple application of our approach is illustrated in the simulated testbed OTBSAF and RETSINA system.

[1]  M. L. Hinman,et al.  Some computational approaches for situation assessment and impact assessment , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[2]  T. Bakert,et al.  Force aggregation via Bayesian nodal analysis , 1998, 1998 IEEE Information Technology Conference, Information Environment for the Future (Cat. No.98EX228).

[3]  John D. Lowrance,et al.  A Framework for Evidential-Reasoning Systems , 1990, AAAI.

[4]  J. J. Sudano Equivalence between belief theories and naive bayesian fusion for systems with independent evidential data: part II, the example , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[5]  Bin Yu,et al.  Uncertain Information Fusion for Force Aggregation and Classification in Airborne Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[6]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  The RETSINA MAS Infrastructure , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[7]  Carl G. Looney,et al.  Interactive clustering and merging with a new fuzzy expected value , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Anthony K. H. Tung,et al.  Spatial clustering methods in data mining : A survey , 2001 .

[9]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[10]  Katia Sycara,et al.  From data to actionable knowledge and decision , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[11]  Sean Owens,et al.  Terrain-Based Information Fusion and Inference , 2004 .

[12]  P. L. Bogler,et al.  Shafer-dempster reasoning with applications to multisensor target identification systems , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Lawrence A. Klein,et al.  Sensor and Data Fusion Concepts and Applications , 1993 .

[14]  D. L. Hall,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion , 1992 .

[15]  Carl G. Looney,et al.  Exploring fusion architecture for a common operational picture , 2001, Inf. Fusion.

[16]  Lily R. Liang,et al.  Cognitive situation and threat assessments of ground battlespaces , 2003, Inf. Fusion.

[17]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Data association through fusion of target track and identification sets , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[18]  J.J. Sudano Equivalence between belief theories and naive bayesian fusion for systems with independent evidential data: part I, the theory , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[19]  Johan Schubert,et al.  Evidential force aggregation , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[20]  Johan Schubert Reliable Force Aggregation Using a Refined Evidence Specification from Dempster-Shafer Clustering , 2003, ArXiv.

[21]  Pascal Vasseur,et al.  Introduction to Multisensor Data Fusion , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.