A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics

We propose a theory of political parties in which interest groups and activists are the key actors, and coalitions of groups develop common agendas and screen candidates for party nominations based on loyalty to their agendas. This theoretical stance contrasts with currently dominant theories, which view parties as controlled by election-minded politicians. The difference is normatively important because parties dominated by interest groups and activists are less responsive to voter preferences, even to the point of taking advantage of lapses in voter attention to politics. Our view is consistent with evidence from the formation of national parties in the 1790s, party position change on civil rights and abortion, patterns of polarization in Congress, policy design and nominations for state legislatures, Congress, and the presidency.

[1]  NoelHans.  The Coalition Merchants: The Ideological Roots of the Civil Rights Realignment , 2014 .

[2]  Joseph G. Peschek.  The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy , 2013 .

[3]  M. Sidel.  Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime , 2012 .

[4]  Michael S. Kang.  Sore Loser Laws and Democratic Contestation , 2011 .

[5]  L. Disch.  Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation , 2011, American Political Science Review.

[6]  J. Hacker,et al.  Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer--and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class , 2010 .

[7]  S. Ansolabehere,et al.  Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[8]  Joseph Bafumi,et al.  Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Jamie L. Carson,et al.  The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress , 2010 .

[10]  E. Schickler,et al.  Congressional Parties and Civil Rights Politics from 1933 to 1972 , 2010 .

[11]  T. Carsey,et al.  Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[12]  J. Berry,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups , 2010 .

[13]  Chris Reed,et al.  A logic of delegation , 2010, Artif. Intell..

[14]  R. Katz,et al.  The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement , 2009, Perspectives on Politics.

[15]  David Karol.  Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management , 2009 .

[16]  F. Hernández.  The democratic dilemma , 2009 .

[17]  N. Kaufman.  The consequences of reform. , 2009, Hospitals & health networks.

[18]  Matt Grossmann,et al.  Party Coalitions and Interest Group Networks , 2009 .

[19]  Seth E. Masket,et al.  No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures , 2009 .

[20]  James Adams,et al.  Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in 25 Postwar Democracies , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[21]  Hans Noel,et al.  The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform , 2008 .

[22]  Jessica Trounstine.  Political Monopolies in American Cities: The Rise and Fall of Bosses and Reformers , 2008 .

[23]  Nancy L. Rosenblum.  On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship , 2008 .

[24]  Jorge Delva,et al.  The presidential election. , 2008, Social work.

[25]  Douglas A. Hibbs,et al.  Implications of the ‘bread and peace’ model for the 2008 US presidential election , 2008 .

[26]  E. Schickler,et al.  Platforms and Partners: The Civil Rights Realignment Reconsidered , 2008, Studies in American Political Development.

[27]  A. Abramowitz.  Don't Blame Primary Voters for Polarization , 2008 .

[28]  E. Miguel,et al.  The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[29]  Seth E. Masket,et al.  It Takes an Outsider: Extralegislative Organization and Partisanship in the California Assembly, 1849–2006 , 2007 .

[30]  Keith T. Poole,et al.  on party polarization in Congress , 2007, Daedalus.

[31]  David A. Siegel,et al.  Rational Parties and Retrospective Voters , 2007 .

[32]  Kathleen Bawn,et al.  Long Coalitions Under Electoral Uncertainty: Zero Sum Conflict and the Electoral Origins of Political Parties , 2007 .

[33]  J. White.  Polsby and Wildavsky , 2007 .

[34]  J. Middendorf.  A Glorious Disaster: Barry Goldwater's Presidential Campaign and the Origins of the Conservative Movement , 2006 .

[35]  John C. Green,et al.  The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties , 2006 .

[36]  Tom Parnell,et al.  The Road to the White House , 2006 .

[37]  Alan V. Deardorff,et al.  Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy , 2006, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Orit Kedar.  When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancingin Parliamentary Elections , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[39]  Julia A. Spiker.  Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability , 2004 .

[40]  Woojin Moon.  Party Activists, Campaign Resources and Candidate Position Taking: Theory, Tests and Applications , 2004, British Journal of Political Science.

[41]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[42]  Holly Kickliter,et al.  ROAD TO THE WHITE HOUSE , 2004 .

[43]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Rethinking Representation , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[44]  Michael F. Holt.  The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party , 2003 .

[45]  C. Wolbrecht.  Explaining Women's Rights Realignment: Convention Delegates, 1972–1992 , 2002 .

[46]  D. Brady,et al.  Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Tim Groseclose,et al.  A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage , 2001 .

[48]  Larry M. Bartels,et al.  Presidential Vote Models: A Recount , 2001, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[49]  Richard L. Hasen.  Do the Parties or the People Own the Electoral Process , 2001 .

[50]  B. Cain,et al.  The Legal Status of Political Parties: A Reassessment of Competing Paradigms , 2000 .

[51]  W. Müller,et al.  Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions , 1999 .

[52]  M. Sanders,et al.  Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877-1917 , 1999 .

[53]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[54]  Richard S. Katz,et al.  Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy , 1995 .

[55]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Who Controls? Information and the Structure of Legislative Decision Making , 1994 .

[56]  Kaare W. Strøm.  The Presthus Debacle: Intraparty Politics and Bargaining Failure in Norway , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[57]  A. Lupia.  Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[58]  Dennis F. Kinsey,et al.  The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns , 1993 .

[59]  David B. Magleby,et al.  The Myth of the Independent Voter , 1992 .

[60]  A. Lupia.  Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[61]  W. D. Burnham.  The Rise of Candidate-centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s . By Martin P. Wattenberg. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991. 186p. $24.95. , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[62]  William F. Connelly,et al.  Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House , 1992 .

[63]  E. Dionne,et al.  Why Americans Hate Politics , 1991 .

[64]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  A Comparative Spatial Analysis of European Party Systems , 1990 .

[65]  Gerald C. Wright.  Policy Voting in the U.S. Senate: Who Is Represented? , 1989 .

[66]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  A Directional Theory of Issue Voting , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[67]  Ross K. Baker,et al.  The Election of 1988: Reports and Interpretations , 1989 .

[68]  Alan Ware.  Placing parties in American politics: organization, electoral settings, and government activity in the twentieth century , 1987 .

[69]  R. Weaver.  The Politics of Blame Avoidance , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[70]  K. T. Poole,et al.  A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis , 1985 .

[71]  J. Bibby,et al.  Whither the Local Parties?.7 A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of the Strength of Party Organizations* , 1985 .

[72]  R. Calvert.  Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence* , 1985 .

[73]  V. O. Key,et al.  Southern Politics In State and Nation , 1984 .

[74]  Steven S. Smith.  Majority Leadership in the U.S. House . By Sinclair Barbara. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983. Pp. 336. $25.00, cloth; $12.95, paper.) , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[75]  D. Wittman.  Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[76]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Politics of Congressional Elections , 1983 .

[77]  M. Fiorina.  Group Concentration and the Delegation of Legislative Authority , 1982 .

[78]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[79]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[80]  K. Shepsle.  The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[81]  V. O. Key,et al.  The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. , 1970 .

[82]  G. Pomper.  Nominating the President : the politics of convention choice, with a new postscript on 1964 , 1965 .

[83]  T. Lowi.  American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory , 1964, World Politics.

[84]  M. Duverger.  Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State , 1964 .

[85]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[86]  D. Lockard.  New England State Politics , 1959 .

[87]  W. Chambers.  The Jeffersonian Republicans: The Formation of Party Organization, 1789–1801. By Noble E. Cunningham Jr., (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1958. Pp. x, 279. $6.00.) , 1959 .

[88]  S. Kurtz.  The Presidency of John Adams: The Collapse of Federalism, 1795-1800 , 1957 .

[89]  Samuel J. Eldersveld,et al.  Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System , 1951 .

[90]  A. Schlesinger.  AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION. Toward a More Responsible Two-party System. A Report of the Committee on Political Parties (supplement to American Political Science Review, September, 1950). Pp. xi, 99. Washington, 1950, and New York: Rinehart & Company, 1950. $1.00 , 1951 .

[91]  D. Black.  On the Rationale of Group Decision-making , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[92]  Charles Richardson.  Party Government , 1892 .

[93]  Hans Noel.  Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America: The Coalition Merchants , 2014 .

[94]  Drew A. Linzer,et al.  Electoral systems and the balance of consumer-producer power , 2010 .

[95]  M. Hinich,et al.  Topics in analytical political economy , 2007 .

[96]  Ulrich Sieberer.  Rezension zu: Cox, Gary W.; McCubbins, Mathew D.: Setting the Agenda : Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representative. Cambridge, 2005 , 2006 .

[97]  Christopher H. Achen,et al.  Musical Chairs: Pocketbook Voting and the Limits of Democratic Accountability , 2004 .

[98]  C. Wolbrecht.  EXPLAINING WOMEN'S RIGHTS REALIGNMENT: Convention Delegates, , 2002 .

[99]  James M. Snyder,et al.  An Informational Rationale for Political Parties , 2002 .

[100]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections , 2001 .

[101]  R. Houweling.  LEGISLATORS' PERSONAL POLICY PREFERENCES AND PARTISAN LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION , 2000 .

[102]  John Heppen.  The Rise of the Republican Party in the South: A Geographical Interpretation, 1948-1996. , 1998 .

[103]  Richard L. Hall,et al.  Participation in Congress , 1996 .

[104]  Teresa Somes.  The legal status of political parties , 1996 .

[105]  John H. Aldrich.  Why Parties?: A Second Look , 1995 .

[106]  John H. Aldrich.  Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in America , 1995 .

[107]  Paul S. Herrnson,et al.  Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington , 1995 .

[108]  M. Wattenberg.  The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s , 1991 .

[109]  R. Arnold.  The logic of congressional action , 1990 .

[110]  James H. Kuklinski,et al.  Information and democratic processes , 1990 .

[111]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics , 1989 .

[112]  G. Cox.  The efficient secret , 1987 .

[113]  T. L. Schwartz.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[114]  J Scottarmstrong,et al.  Forecasting presidential elections , 1986 .

[115]  B. Sinclair.  Majority leadership in the U.S. House , 1983 .

[116]  F. Sorauf.  Party politics in America , 1976 .

[117]  W. J. Keefe.  Parties, Politics, And Public Policy in America , 1972 .

[118]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[119]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Presidential Elections: Strategies of American Electoral Politics , 1964 .

[120]  R. M. Hutchins.  The democratic dilemma , 1951 .

[121]  G. Mowry,et al.  The California Progressives , 1951 .

[122]  Ralph Henry Gabriel,et al.  The rise of American democracy , 1938 .