Mobile advertising: The influence of emotional attachment to mobile devices on consumer receptiveness

Mobile advertising has grown rapidly over recent years, yet volume is not necessarily a good measure of consumer acceptance. Earlier studies have explored acceptance in terms of content; here we focus on the communication medium, the mobile device. Building upon Vincent's (2006) premise that emotional attachment to mobile phones is a likely key influence on future adoption of new services, we explore whether this holds true for mobile users' receptiveness to mobile advertising. Our research reveals that users are emotionally attached to their mobile devices and that attachment is to a large degree attributable to a sense that the device is an essential part of life with a value that goes beyond simple communication. Those with a strong sense of attachment are more receptive to mobile adverts, however overall users generally find them irritating. It appears that advertisers have hitherto been insufficiently user-centric; responses are as important as the message yet there is a tendency to concentrate on what is being sent rather than how it is received. We conclude that consumer receptiveness might improve by targeting users who are strongly attached their mobile devices.

[1]  H F HARLOW,et al.  Social deprivation in monkeys. , 1962, Scientific American.

[2]  Mariko Morimoto,et al.  Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Unsolicited Commercial E-mail and Postal Direct Mail Marketing Methods , 2006 .

[3]  Arno Scharl,et al.  An investigation and conceptual model of SMS marketing , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[4]  Soe-Tsyr Yuan,et al.  A recommendation mechanism for contextualized mobile advertising , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Heikki Karjaluoto,et al.  Factors influencing consumers' willingness to accept mobile advertising: a conceptual model , 2005, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[6]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Uncovering patterns in mobile advertising opt-in behaviour: a decision hierarchy approach , 2008, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[7]  B. Rowe,et al.  Getting the message across. , 1999, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[8]  H. Harlow,et al.  Affectional responses in the infant monkey; orphaned baby monkeys develop a strong and persistent attachment to inanimate surrogate mothers. , 1959, Science.

[9]  Lynne Hamill,et al.  The Influence of Mobile Phone Users on the Design of 3G Products and Services , 2005 .

[10]  Patrick Barwise,et al.  Permission-based mobile advertising , 2002 .

[11]  S. O'Donohoe,et al.  Why young consumers are not open to mobile marketing communication , 2007 .

[12]  Amy Carroll,et al.  Consumer perceptions and attitudes towards SMS advertising: recent evidence from New Zealand , 2007 .

[13]  Akihiro Inoue,et al.  An advanced model of consumer attitudes toward advertising on the mobile internet , 2007, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[14]  Jari Salo,et al.  Retailer Use of Permission-Based Mobile Advertising , 2005 .

[15]  Jane Vincent,et al.  Emotional attachment and mobile phones , 2005, Thumb Culture.

[16]  V. Virtanen,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Drivers of Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Advertising , 2007 .

[17]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  Consumer Attitudes Toward Mobile Advertising: An Empirical Study , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[18]  Amparo Lasen,et al.  History Repeating? A Comparison of the Launch and Uses of Fixed and Mobile Phones , 2005, Mobile World.

[19]  Kai Wehmeyer,et al.  Assessing Users' Attachment to Their Mobile Devices , 2007, International Conference on the Management of Mobile Business (ICMB 2007).

[20]  Terhi-Anna Wilska,et al.  Mobile Phone Use as Part of Young People's Consumption Styles , 2003 .