The Many Faces of RU486: Tales of Situated Knowledges and Technological Contestations

In the highly contentious abortion arena, the new oral abortifacient technology RU486 is one among many actors. This article offers an arena analysis of the heterogeneous constructions of RU486 by various actors, including scientists, pharmaceutical compa nies, medical groups, antiabortion groups, women's health movement groups, and others who have produced situated knowledges. Conceptually, we find not only that the identity of the nonhuman actor-RU486 -is unstable and multiple but also that, in practice, there are other (previously invisible) implicated actors—the downstream users and consumers of the technology. If we try to follow all the actors, we find a fuller and more historicized arena, and, ironically, we too can be construed as implicated actors in it.

[1]  D. Haraway Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 1988 .

[2]  Howard S. Becker,et al.  Whose Side are we on , 1967 .

[3]  L. Dumble,et al.  RU 486/prostaglandin threats to safe pregnancy termination. , 1992, Issues in reproductive and genetic engineering : journal of international feminist analysis.

[4]  E. Baulieu The Albert Lasker Medical Awards. RU-486 as an antiprogesterone steroid. From receptor to contragestion and beyond. , 1989, JAMA.

[5]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[6]  B. Werble Outsiders Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. , 1966 .

[7]  S. Henshaw Induced Abortion—A World Review , 1986 .

[8]  J. Reed From private vice to public virtue: The birth control movement and American society since 1830 , 1978 .

[9]  P. Donovan Funding restrictions on fetal research: the implications for science and health. , 1990, Family planning perspectives.

[10]  Gillian Yudkin,et al.  Women, Health and Healing — Toward a New Perspective , 1986 .

[11]  M. S. Goldstein Creating and controlling a medical market: abortion in Los Angeles after liberalization. , 1984, Social problems.

[12]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss , 1991 .

[13]  Ann Rudinow Sætnan,et al.  Rigid Politics and Technological Flexibility: The Anatomy of a Failed Hospital Innovation , 1991 .

[14]  M. Weatherall,et al.  The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the human genome project , 1993, Medical History.

[15]  M. Klitsch Antiprogestins and the abortion controversy: a progress report. , 1991, Family planning perspectives.

[16]  C. Levinson At Any Cost: Corporate Greed, Women, and the Dalkon Shield , 1987 .

[17]  L. Gordon Woman's Body, Woman's Right: Birth Control In America , 1990 .

[18]  J. Freeman,et al.  The Politics of Women's Liberation , 1975 .

[19]  J. Quadagno The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict.By Suzanne Staggenborg. Oxford University Press, 1991. 256 pp. $27.50 , 1991 .

[20]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Creating Sociological Awareness: Collective Images and Symbolic Representations , 1991 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. , 1979 .

[22]  D. VanBiema The abortion pill. , 1990 .

[23]  B. Seaman,et al.  Women And The Crisis In Sex Hormones , 1977 .

[24]  Leroy Hood,et al.  The Code of Codes Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project , 1992 .

[25]  H. M. Collins Captives and Victims: Comment on Scott, Richards, and Martin , 1991 .

[26]  S. Henshaw Induced abortion: a world review, 1990. , 1990, International family planning perspectives and digest.

[27]  E. Baulieu,et al.  Voluntary interruption of pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. A large-scale French experience. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  R. Petchesky Fetal Images: The Power of Visual Culture in The Politics of Reproduction , 2021, The Medicalization of Obstetrics.

[29]  B. Martin,et al.  Captives of Controversy: The Myth of the Neutral Social Researcher in Contemporary Scientific Controversies , 1990 .

[30]  S. Henshaw,et al.  Abortion services in the United States, 1979 and 1980. , 1982, Family planning perspectives.

[31]  R. Davis-Floyd The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction , 1990 .

[32]  R. Petchesky Abortion and Woman's Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom. , 1988 .

[33]  S. Henshaw Freestanding abortion clinics: services, structure, fees. , 1982, Family planning perspectives.

[34]  Anthony R. Kovner,et al.  Health Care Politics , 1975 .

[35]  J. C. Mohr Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800-1900 , 1978 .

[36]  L. Mastroianni,et al.  Developing new contraceptives : obstacles and opportunities , 1990 .

[37]  S. Goldsmith,et al.  Aspiration abortion without cervical dilation. , 1971, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[39]  Nadine Taub,et al.  Reproductive Laws for the 1990s , 1988, Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society.

[40]  A. Davis Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment , 1993 .

[41]  Judith Bruce,et al.  Users' perspectives on contraceptive technology and delivery systems highlighting some feminist issues , 1987 .

[42]  B. H. Cottrell RU 486. , 1995, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[43]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Simplification in Scientific Work: An Example from Neuroscience Research , 1983 .

[44]  I. Bukovsky,et al.  Mifepristone (RU486) alone or in combination with a prostaglandin analogue for termination of early pregnancy: a review. , 1991, Fertility and sterility.

[45]  Elizabeth Farrell,et al.  Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800-1900 , 1978 .

[46]  G. Donovan From Abortion to Reproductive Freedom: Transforming A Movement , 1992 .

[47]  T. Shapiro Population Control Politics: Women, Sterilization, and Reproductive Choice , 1985 .

[48]  C. Mills Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive , 1940 .

[49]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[50]  D. Mark,et al.  Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology , 1995 .

[51]  G. Teutsch,et al.  204. RU 38486 — A potent antiprogesterone , 1982 .

[52]  B. Latour Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[53]  Cory Richards,et al.  RU 486: medical breakthrough held hostage. , 1990, Issues in science and technology.

[54]  D E Koshland,et al.  The Molecule of the Year. , 1989, Science.

[55]  H. Becker,et al.  Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. , 1964 .

[56]  A. Clarke,et al.  Controversy and the development of reproductive sciences. , 1990, Social problems.

[57]  J. Raymond,et al.  Ru 486: Misconceptions, Myths and Morals , 1991 .

[58]  Emergence of the reproductive research enterprise : a sociology of biological, medical and agricultural science in the United States, 1910-1940 , 1986 .

[59]  S. Henshaw,et al.  Abortion services in the United States, 1987 and 1988. , 1990, Family planning perspectives.

[60]  B. Martin,et al.  Who's a Captive? Who's a Victim? Response to Collins's Method Talk , 1991 .

[61]  M. Koblinsky,et al.  Reproduction and human welfare: a challenge to research. , 1976, Bioscience.

[62]  T. Sangeetha,et al.  On “Women” , 1994, The Historical Journal.

[63]  B. Thorne,et al.  The women's health movement : feminist alternatives to medical control , 1983 .

[64]  Barbara A. Koenig,et al.  The Technological Imperative in Medical Practice: The Social Creation of a “Routine” Treatment , 1988 .

[65]  S. L. Star,et al.  Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On being Allergic to Onions , 1990 .

[66]  Judy Bury The Politics of Contraception: Birth Control in the Year 2001 , 1982 .