Increase in vertebral body size in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Bone geometry plays a prominent role in bone strength. Cross-sectional studies have shown that advancing age is associated with increasing diameter of long bones, related to both periostal apposition and endosteal resorption. However, there are few data provided by prospective studies, especially concerning the changes in vertebral body dimensions. The objective of this prospective study was to measure the changes occurring in the vertebral body size of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Three-year data from placebo groups of the SOTI and TROPOS trials, performed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, were used for this study. In these trials, patients underwent lateral radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine at baseline and annually over 3 years, according to standardized procedures. Six-point digitization method was used: the four corner points of the vertebral body from T4 to L4 are marked, as well as an additional point in the middle of the upper and lower endplates. From these 6 points, the vertebral body perimeter, area and depth were measured at baseline and at 3 years. The analysis excluded all vertebrae with prevalent or incident fracture. A total of 2017 postmenopausal women (mean age 73.4+/-6.1 years) with a mean lumbar spine T score of -3.1+/-1.5, and a mean femoral neck T score of -3.0+/-0.7 are included in the analysis. Vertebral body dimensions increased over 3 years, by 2.1+/-5.5% (mean depth+/-SD), by 1.7+/-8.3% (mean area+/-SD) and by 1.5+/-4.9% (mean perimeter+/-SD) at the thoracic level (T4 to T12). At the lumbar level (L1 to L4), these dimensions increased as well: 1.4+/-3.6% (mean depth+/-SD), 1.4+/-5.7% (mean area+/-SD), 0.7+/-2.9% (mean perimeter+/-SD). A significant increase in vertebral body size was observed for each vertebral level from T5 to L4 for each of these parameters (p<0.01). These prospective results demonstrate that vertebral body dimensions increase over 3 years in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

[1]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Structural adaptations to bone loss in aging men and women. , 2006, Bone.

[2]  E. Seeman.  Periosteal bone formation--a neglected determinant of bone strength. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  P. Delmas,et al.  Bone loss in elderly men: increased endosteal bone loss and stable periosteal apposition. The prospective MINOS study , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  L Mosekilde,et al.  Proportion of human vertebral body bone that is cancellous , 1990, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  Pekka Kannus,et al.  Effect of Long‐Term Impact‐Loading on Mass, Size, and Estimated Strength of Humerus and Radius of Female Racquet‐Sports Players: A Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study Between Young and Old Starters and Controls , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  T. Spector,et al.  Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men , 2002, The Lancet.

[8]  S. Bass,et al.  Effects of Repetitive Loading on Bone Mass and Geometry in Young Male Tennis Players: A Quantitative Study Using MRI , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  Sundeep Khosla,et al.  Population‐Based Study of Age and Sex Differences in Bone Volumetric Density, Size, Geometry, and Structure at Different Skeletal Sites , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  C. Turner,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in Vertebral Fragility Is More the Result of Gender Differences in Age‐Related Bone Gain Than Bone Loss , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  Bone Loss and Bone Size after Menopause , 2003 .

[12]  D. Kiel,et al.  Hip structural geometry in old and old-old age: similarities and differences between men and women. , 2007, Bone.

[13]  R. Lazenby.  Continuing periosteal apposition. I: Documentation, hypotheses, and interpretation. , 1990, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  R. Andresen,et al.  Contribution of the cortical shell of vertebrae to mechanical behaviour of the lumbar vertebrae with implications for predicting fracture risk. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Bone Fragility: Failure of Periosteal Apposition to Compensate for Increased Endocortical Resorption in Postmenopausal Women , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  Fernando Rivadeneira,et al.  Femoral Neck BMD Is a Strong Predictor of Hip Fracture Susceptibility in Elderly Men and Women Because It Detects Cortical Bone Instability: The Rotterdam Study , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  J. M. Guralnik,et al.  Aging bone in men and women: beyond changes in bone mineral density , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  C. Turner,et al.  The Biomechanical Basis of Vertebral Body Fragility in Men and Women , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  Ian H Parkinson,et al.  Antero-postero differences in cortical thickness and cortical porosity of T12 to L5 vertebral bodies. , 2006, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[20]  E. Orwoll.  Toward an Expanded Understanding of the Role of the Periosteum in Skeletal Health , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  C. Y. Wang,et al.  Predictors of Adherence in the Women's Health Initiative Calcium and Vitamin D Trial , 2009, Behavioral medicine.

[22]  K. Ensrud,et al.  Dimensions and Volumetric BMD of the Proximal Femur and Their Relation to Age Among Older U.S. Men , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  E. Seeman.  The periosteum—a surface for all seasons , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[24]  J. Reginster,et al.  Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[25]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Cortical and Trabecular Load Sharing in the Human Vertebral Body , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Structural and Biomechanical Basis of Sexual Dimorphism in Femoral Neck Fragility Has Its Origins in Growth and Aging , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Calcium-enriched foods and bone mass growth in prepubertal girls: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Males Have Larger Skeletal Size and Bone Mass Than Females, Despite Comparable Body Size , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[29]  K. Khaw,et al.  Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65. , 2003, Bone.

[30]  W C Hayes,et al.  Load Sharing Between the Shell and Centrum in the Lumbar Vertebral Body , 1997, Spine.