Using New Technologies for Time Diary Data Collection: Instrument Design and Data Quality Findings from a Mixed-Mode Pilot Survey

Recent years have witnessed a steady growth of time-use research, driven by the increased research and policy interest in population activity patterns and their associations with long-term outcomes. There is recent interest in moving beyond traditional paper-administered time diaries to use new technologies for data collection in order to reduce respondent burden and administration costs, and to improve data quality. This paper presents two novel diary instruments that were employed by a large-scale multi-disciplinary cohort study in order to obtain information on the time allocation of adolescents in the United Kingdom. A web-administered diary and a smartphone app were created, and a mixed-mode data collection approach was followed: cohort members were asked to choose between these two modes, and those who were unable or refused to use the web/app modes were offered a paper diary. Using data from a pilot survey of 86 participants, we examine diary data quality indicators across the three modes. Results suggest that the web and app modes yield an overall better time diary data quality than the paper mode, with a higher proportion of diaries with complete activity and contextual information. Results also show that the web and app modes yield a comparable number of activity episodes to the paper mode. These results suggest that the use of new technologies can improve diary data quality. Future research using larger samples should systematically investigate selection and measurement effects in mixed-mode time-use survey designs.

[1]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[2]  Jens Bonke,et al.  The Impact of Incentives and Interview Methods on Response Quantity and Quality in Diary- and Booklet-Based Surveys: , 2009 .

[3]  C. Stendler One Boy's Day: A Specimen Record of Behavior. , 1952 .

[4]  VIviane Brunne,et al.  Active ageing and solidarity between generations in Europe and beyond. A view from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe , 2013 .

[5]  Kimberly Fisher,et al.  Coming full circle - introducing the Multinational Time Use Study Simple File. , 2013, Electronic international journal of time use research.

[6]  Sandra L. Hofferth,et al.  How American Children Spend Their Time , 2001 .

[7]  Robert B. Textor,et al.  Does Labor Time Decrease with Industrializa- tion? A Survey of Time-Allocation Studies' , 2016 .

[8]  John P. Robinson,et al.  What did you do today? Children's use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. , 1997 .

[9]  R. Merton,et al.  Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis , 1937, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  P. Turke,et al.  Measuring Time Allocation: Observation and Intention , 1985, Current Anthropology.

[11]  Stephen Pudney,et al.  2. Measurement Error in Stylized and Diary Data on Time Use , 2008 .

[12]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time , 1998 .

[13]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time , 1998 .

[14]  Joeri Minnen Modular Online Time Use Survey (MOTUS) – Translating an existing method in the 21st century , 2014 .

[15]  Robert E. Rhoades,et al.  Does Labor Time Decrease With Industrialization? A Survey of Time-Allocation Studies [and Comments and Reply] , 1980, Current Anthropology.

[16]  Dan Ryan Time Use: Expanding the Explanatory Power of the Social Sciences , 2007 .

[17]  J. Zuzanek Does Being Well-Off Make Us Happier? Problems of Measurement , 2013 .

[18]  Ignace Glorieux,et al.  In Search of the Harried Leisure Class in Contemporary Society: Time-Use Surveys and Patterns of Leisure Time Consumption , 2010 .

[19]  Jerry A. Jacobs,et al.  Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society , 2002 .

[20]  Ignace Glorieux,et al.  How many days? A comparison of the quality of time-use data from 2-day and 7-day diaries , 2009 .

[21]  English Only Economic Commission for Europe , 2012 .

[22]  Elizabeth Quinlan,et al.  Conspicuous Invisibility , 2008 .

[23]  J. Wajcman,et al.  The Rush Hour: The Character of Leisure Time and Gender Equity , 2000 .

[24]  Matthew D. Cooper,et al.  PODD: a portable diary data collection system , 2014, AVI.

[25]  N. Bolger,et al.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Hiromi Ono,et al.  2. An Assessment of Alternative Measures of Time Use , 2003 .

[27]  Merz Joachim New developments in time technology – projects, data, computing and services (Time Pieces)) , 2013 .

[28]  C. Zick,et al.  A New Look at Parents' Time Spent in Child Care: Primary and Secondary Time Use , 1996 .

[29]  Ruut Veenhoven,et al.  Why are Locals Happier than Internal Migrants? The Role of Daily Life , 2016 .

[30]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Survey research. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Andrew S. Harvey Time-Use Metadata , 2002 .