Diagnostics for conformity of paired quantitative measurements

Matched pairs data arise in many contexts - in case-control clinical trials, for example, and from cross-over designs. They also arise in experiments to verify the equivalence of quantitative assays. This latter use (which is the main focus of this paper) raises difficulties not always seen in other matched pairs applications. Since the designs deliberately vary the analyte levels over a wide range, issues of variance dependent on mean, calibrations of differing slopes, and curvature all need to be added to the usual model assumptions such as normality. Violations in any of these assumptions invalidate the conventional matched pairs analysis. A graphical method, due to Bland and Altman, of looking at the relationship between the average and the difference of the members of the pairs is shown to correspond to a formal testable regression model. Using standard regression diagnostics, one may detect and diagnose departures from the model assumptions and remedy them - for example using variable transformations. Examples of different common scenarios and possible approaches to handling them are shown.

[1]  Stan C. Lin,et al.  Evaluation of statistical equivalence using limits of agreement and associated sample size calculation , 1998 .

[2]  W. Westlake,et al.  Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials. , 1976, Biometrics.

[3]  D G Altman,et al.  Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. , 1995, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Hawkins Testing for equality of variance of correlated normal variables , 1981 .

[9]  S. Tsuboi,et al.  The Great Hanshin earthquake , 1996, The Lancet.

[10]  E. Pitman A NOTE ON NORMAL CORRELATION , 1939 .

[11]  John C. Brixey,et al.  Analysis of straight-line data. , 1960 .

[12]  W. A. Morgan TEST FOR THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO VARIANCES IN A SAMPLE FROM A NORMAL BIVARIATE POPULATION , 1939 .

[13]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[14]  David M. Rocke,et al.  A Two-Component Model for Measurement Error in Analytical Chemistry , 1995 .