Computational Modeling and Stem Cell Engineering

A key goal of regenerative medicine and bioengineering is the quantitative and robust control over the fate and behavior of individual cells and their populations, both in vitro and in vivo. Central to this endeavor are stem cells (SCs), which can be functionally defined as undifferentiated cells of a multicellular organism that balance the capacity for sustained self-renewal with the potential to differentiate into specialized cell types. The biology of multicellular organisms necessitates the existence and precise control of SCs to facilitate development from a single cell during embryogenesis, and tissue homeostasis in the face of continual loss of terminally differentiated cells. It is therefore not surprising that SCs have been identified and isolated from numerous adult human tissues, as well as more recently, the inner cell mass of the preimplantation human blastocyst. SCs promise a renewable source of human tissue for research, pharmaceutical testing, and cell-based therapies. Fulfilling this promise will require not only the precise control of SC self-renewal and differentiation, but also imposing this control on the formation of more functionally complex tissue-like structures.

[1]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Multiscale cancer modeling. , 2010, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[3]  David A Winkler,et al.  Robust, quantitative tools for modelling ex-vivo expansion of haematopoietic stem cells and progenitors. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[4]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Cancer phenotype as the outcome of an evolutionary game between normal and malignant cells , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  Kendall Powell,et al.  Stem-cell niches: It's the ecology, stupid! , 2005, Nature.

[6]  Hans Clevers,et al.  On the biomechanics of stem cell niche formation in the gut – modelling growing organoids , 2012, The FEBS journal.

[7]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[8]  Zhi-jun Wu,et al.  Game Dynamic Model for Yeast Development , 2012, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[9]  Nedjeljko Frančula The National Academies Press , 2013 .

[10]  Gabriel S. Eichler,et al.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[11]  Hans Clevers,et al.  A Comprehensive Model of the Spatio-Temporal Stem Cell and Tissue Organisation in the Intestinal Crypt , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Evolutionary and population dynamics: a coupled approach. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Building with a scaffold: emerging strategies for high- to low-level cellular modeling. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[14]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[15]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Analysis of Kinase Pathway Crosstalk in TNF/EGF/Insulin-Induced Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  On the symmetry of siblings: automated single-cell tracking to quantify the behavior of hematopoietic stem cells in a biomimetic setup. , 2012, Experimental hematology.

[17]  Todd C McDevitt,et al.  The multiparametric effects of hydrodynamic environments on stem cell culture. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[18]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast , 2009, Nature.

[19]  Sui Huang,et al.  The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Tim G Benton,et al.  Predictive ecology: systems approaches , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Stochastic modeling of cellular networks. , 2012, Methods in cell biology.

[22]  Timm Schroeder,et al.  Multi-type branching models to describe cell differentiation programs. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  J. Till,et al.  A STOCHASTIC MODEL OF STEM CELL PROLIFERATION, BASED ON THE GROWTH OF SPLEEN COLONY-FORMING CELLS. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[25]  Daniel T. Gillespie,et al.  An Exact Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Coalescence Process in a Cloud , 1975 .

[26]  M. Newman Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks , 2011, Nature Physics.

[27]  Ilya Shmulevich,et al.  Using cell fate attractors to uncover transcriptional regulation of HL60 neutrophil differentiation , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[28]  N. Dillon Factor mediated gene priming in pluripotent stem cells sets the stage for lineage specification , 2012, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[29]  M. Greaves,et al.  Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. , 1997, Genes & development.

[30]  James R Faeder,et al.  Efficient modeling, simulation and coarse-graining of biological complexity with NFsim , 2011, Nature Methods.

[31]  S. Reuveny,et al.  Agitation can induce differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells in microcarrier cultures. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[32]  Jeroen S. van Zon,et al.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration , 2009, Nature.

[33]  D. Schaffer,et al.  The sonic hedgehog signaling system as a bistable genetic switch. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Peter W. Zandstra,et al.  Manipulation of Signaling Thresholds in “Engineered Stem Cell Niches” Identifies Design Criteria for Pluripotent Stem Cell Screens , 2009, PloS one.

[35]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[36]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Logic-Based Models for the Analysis of Cell Signaling Networks† , 2010, Biochemistry.

[37]  Peter W Zandstra,et al.  Rapid expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells by automated control of inhibitory feedback signaling. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[38]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  STEPS: efficient simulation of stochastic reaction–diffusion models in realistic morphologies , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[39]  G. Forde,et al.  Model-based analysis and optimization of bioreactor for hematopoietic stem cell cultivation , 2011, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[40]  Jonathan R. Karr,et al.  A Whole-Cell Computational Model Predicts Phenotype from Genotype , 2012, Cell.

[41]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method , 2004 .

[42]  J Yang,et al.  Rule-based modelling and simulation of biochemical systems with molecular finite automata. , 2010, IET systems biology.

[43]  S. Kauffman Homeostasis and Differentiation in Random Genetic Control Networks , 1969, Nature.

[44]  David Liao,et al.  Physics of cancer propagation: A game theory perspective. , 2012, AIP advances.

[45]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Asynchronous adaptive time step in quantitative cellular automata modeling , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[46]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Optimality in the Development of Intestinal Crypts , 2012, Cell.

[47]  K. Smith‐Miles,et al.  Self-organizing circuitry and emergent computation in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2012, Stem cell research.

[48]  Mary E. Sehl,et al.  Stem Cell Niche Dynamics: From Homeostasis to Carcinogenesis , 2012, Stem cells international.

[49]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  A Nagy,et al.  Stem cell bioengineering. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[51]  L. A. Hidalgo-Bastida,et al.  Modeling and design of optimal flow perfusion bioreactors for tissue engineering applications. , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[52]  M. Mangel,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of stem cells and their niches : the time is now , 2007 .

[53]  E. A. Sykes,et al.  Cell–cell interaction networks regulate blood stem and progenitor cell fate , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[54]  Andreas Hellander,et al.  URDME: a modular framework for stochastic simulation of reaction-transport processes in complex geometries , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[55]  Shin-Ichi Nishikawa,et al.  Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium , 2009, Nature.

[56]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Nanog Variability and Pluripotency Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cells - Insights from a Mathematical Model Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[57]  Timothy K Lee,et al.  Single-cell NF-κB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing , 2010, Nature.

[58]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[59]  M. Bowler,et al.  On the statistical mechanics of species abundance distributions. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[60]  M. Ferrari,et al.  What does physics have to do with cancer? , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[61]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[62]  Andre Choo,et al.  Scalable platform for human embryonic stem cell differentiation to cardiomyocytes in suspended microcarrier cultures. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[63]  Sylvain Fouliard,et al.  Modeling and simulation of cell populations interaction , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[64]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The network takeover , 2011, Nature Physics.

[65]  Kei-Hoi Cheung,et al.  BioPAX – A community standard for pathway data sharing , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[66]  A. Trumpp,et al.  Therapy of chronic myeloid leukaemia can benefit from the activation of stem cells: simulation studies of different treatment combinations , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[67]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[68]  Elke K Markert,et al.  Higher order Boolean networks as models of cell state dynamics. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[69]  Adelinde M. Uhrmacher,et al.  Rule-based multi-level modeling of cell biological systems , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[70]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Optimization in computational systems biology , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[71]  K. Pienta,et al.  Modeling invasion of metastasizing cancer cells to bone marrow utilizing ecological principles , 2011, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[72]  Avi Ma’ayan,et al.  Toward a complete in silico, multi‐layered embryonic stem cell regulatory network , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[73]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  A novel dynamic model of hematopoietic stem cell organization based on the concept of within-tissue plasticity. , 2002, Experimental hematology.

[74]  R. Metzler,et al.  Strange kinetics of single molecules in living cells , 2012 .

[75]  Leslie M Loew,et al.  Spatial modeling of cell signaling networks. , 2012, Methods in cell biology.

[76]  Adilson E. Motter,et al.  Networks in Motion , 2012, ArXiv.

[77]  F. Doyle,et al.  Cell population modelling describes intrinsic heterogeneity: a case study for hematopoietic stem cells. , 2011, IET systems biology.

[78]  Finn Verner Jensen,et al.  Bayesian networks , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[79]  Ignacio A. Rodriguez-Brenes,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of feedback escape and the development of stem-cell–driven cancers , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Phenotypic Evolutionary Models in Stem Cell Biology: Replacement, Quiescence, and Variability , 2008, PloS one.

[81]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Computational Modeling of the Hematopoietic Erythroid-Myeloid Switch Reveals Insights into Cooperativity, Priming, and Irreversibility , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[82]  I. Banerjee,et al.  Population Based Model of Human Embryonic Stem Cell (hESC) Differentiation during Endoderm Induction , 2012, PloS one.