Decoding Market Disruption: New Schema, Model, and Findings

The failure of firms in the face of technological change has been a topic of intense research and debate, spawning the theory (among others) of disruptive technologies. However, the theory suffers from circular definitions, inadequate empirical evidence, and lack of a predictive model. The authors develop a new schema to address these limitations. The schema generates seven hypotheses and a testable model relating to platform technologies. The authors test this model and hypotheses with data on 36 technologies from 7 markets. Contrary to extant theory, technologies that adopt a lower attack (“potentially disruptive technologies”) 1) are introduced as frequently by incumbents as by entrants, 2) are not cheaper than older technologies, and 3) rarely disrupt firms, and 4) both entrants and lower attacks significantly reduce the hazard of disruption. Moreover, technology disruption is not permanent due to multiple crossings in technology performance and numerous rival technologies co-existing without one disrupting the other. The proposed predictive model of disruption shows good out-of-sample predictive accuracy. The authors discuss the implications of these findings.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[3]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[4]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Functional Regression: A New Model for Predicting Market Penetration of New Products , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[5]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[6]  Mary Tripsas Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry , 1997 .

[7]  C. Markides Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen Seeing What's Next , 2004 .

[9]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  Punctuated Equilibria and Technological Progress , 1990 .

[10]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[11]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[12]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The disruption opportunity , 2003 .

[13]  P. Ghemawat Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia , 1991 .

[14]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[15]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[16]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network , 1995 .

[17]  Charles W. L. Hill,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Complementary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[18]  R. V. Wyk Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[19]  L A Lillard,et al.  Simultaneous equations for hazards: marriage duration and fertility timing. , 1993, Journal of econometrics.

[20]  J. Utterback,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: An Expanded View , 2005, Digital Disruptive Innovation.

[21]  M. Pentecost,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Warum manche Unternehmen erfolgreicher wachsen als andere , 2018 .

[22]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  A Bivariate Timing Model of Customer Acquisition and Retention , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[23]  Erwin Danneels Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[24]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Technological innovation: On flipping coins and making technology choices: Luck as an explanation of technological foresight and oversight , 1997 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change: Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change , 1998 .

[26]  S. Gould,et al.  Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered , 1977, Paleobiology.

[27]  Ron Adner When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition , 2002 .

[28]  Rebecca Henderson The Innovator's Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence , 2006 .

[29]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[30]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[31]  Rafesh Koshy Chandy Organizing for Radical Product Innovation , 1998 .

[32]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Disruptive change. When trying harder is part of the problem. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[33]  R. Kostoff,et al.  Disruptive technology roadmaps , 2004 .

[34]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[35]  F. Rothaermel Complementary Assets, Strategic Alliances, and the Incumbent's Advantage: An Empirical Study of Industry and Firm Effects in the Biopharmaceutical Industry , 2001 .

[36]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[37]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Radical Innovation and Corporate Regeneration , 1994 .

[38]  Jehoshua Eliashberg,et al.  New Product Announcement Signals and Incumbent Reactions , 1995 .

[39]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[40]  G. Tellis Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership? , 2006 .

[41]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation , 2005 .

[42]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[43]  Mary Tripsas UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[44]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Survival analysis using sas®: a practical guide , 1995 .

[45]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[46]  Ron Adner,et al.  Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition , 2003 .

[47]  Ashish Sood,et al.  Do Innovations Really Payoff? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[48]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions* , 2006 .

[49]  P. S. Natarajan,et al.  The Conditions for Success in Technological Innovation , 1973 .

[50]  P. J. Kampas,et al.  How to identify your enemies before they destroy you. , 2002, Harvard business review.