Discovery in the context of application

Abstract This article addresses several issues raised by a very particular pattern of knowledge generation, called “discovery in the context of application.” The case of a hypersonic aircraft research program illustrates that the organizational design of such programs is a very complex matter. The problem cannot be dealt with in the conventional way by having different organizational forms for different phases of the process—say, one for the research phase another for the development phase, a further for the testing phase, and so on—because of its integral nature. Two modes of organization are considered but neither, on its own, seems to be quite adequate to govern the management of the whole process. The need is to deal with the problem of finding a balance between two (distinct) organizational imperatives: the need to manage the interaction between a large number of projects that are carried out in different locations, and the need to bring a wide range of problem solvers into a single entity. The former mode is necessary to facilitate experiments in different directions and to decrease the risk of missing a possible successful design, the latter to develop the infratechnologies and instrumentalities that will underpin the research agenda.

[1]  G. Tassey Infratechnologies and Economic Growth , 1996 .

[2]  William M. Piland Technology challenges for the National Aero-Space Plane , 1987 .

[3]  Thomas C. Schelling Research by accident , 1996 .

[4]  D. Collingridge Technology organizations and incrementalism: the space shuttle , 1990 .

[5]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  The Technology Pork Barrel , 1991 .

[6]  Barry J. Waldman,et al.  The NASP challenge - Testing for validation , 1989 .

[7]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[8]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic Transportation and Energy Systems in the U.S. , 1987 .

[9]  Edward W. Constant,et al.  A Model for Technological Change Applied to the Turbojet Revolution , 1973 .

[10]  Barry J. Waldman,et al.  The first year of teaming - A progress report. [on X-30 vehicle] , 1991 .

[11]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Basic Research and Industrial Innovation , 1995 .

[12]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Technology infrastructure in information technology industries , 1995 .

[13]  B. W. Augenstein,et al.  The National Aerospace Plane (NASP): Development Issues for the Follow- on Vehicle , 1993 .

[14]  Derek J. de Solla Price,et al.  The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation☆ , 1993 .

[15]  William Sullivan Conducting the NASP ground test program , 1991 .

[16]  Edward J. Woodhouse,et al.  Reframing incrementalism: A constructive response to the critics , 1992 .

[17]  Robert Barthelemy The National Aero-Space Plane program , 1989 .

[18]  K. Arrow The limits of organization , 1974 .

[19]  William M. Piland National Aero-Space Plane , 1987 .

[20]  Dominique Foray,et al.  The Changing Economics of Technological Learning , 1996 .