On Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater: A Reply to Black and Wilensky's Evaluation of Story Grammars

A number of criticisms of a recent paper by Black and Wilensky (1979) are made. (1) In attempting to assess the observational adequacy of story grammars, they state that a context-free grammar cannot handle discontinuous elements; however, they do not show that such elements occur in the domain to which the grammars apply. Further, they do not present adequate evidence for their claim that there are acceptable stories not accounted for by existing grammars and that the grammars will accept nonstories such as procedures. (2) They state that it has been proven that under natural conditions children cannot learn transformational grammars, which is a misrepresentation of the learnability proofs which have been offered. (3) Most important, they take an unduly narrow approach to story understanding by claiming that people only understand story content and do not have knowledge of story structure which is useful in comprehension or memory. Counterevidence from the literature is cited which indicates that such knowledge is both useful and used, and a number of methods for assessing the psychological adequacy of structural models are discussed.

[1]  C. G. Glenn.  The role of episodic structure and of story length in children's recall of simple stories , 1978 .

[2]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Subjective story structure , 1979 .

[3]  P. Postal.  Constituent structure : a study of contemporary models of syntactic description , 1967 .

[4]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  How to catch a fish: The memory and representation of common procedures∗ , 1978 .

[6]  John B. Black,et al.  STORY UNDERSTANDING AS PROBLEM-SOLVING * , 1980 .

[7]  Henry Hamburger,et al.  Identifiability of a Class of Transformational Grammars , 1973 .

[8]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  A tale of two structures: Underlying and surface forms in stories , 1980 .

[10]  Mandler JeanM..  A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval , 1978 .

[11]  Henry Hamburger,et al.  On the Insufficiency of Surface Data for the Learning of Transformational Languages , 1973 .

[12]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  An Evaluation of Story Grammars , 1979 .

[13]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  John B. Black,et al.  Episodes as chunks in narrative memory. , 1979 .

[15]  Karl Haberlandt,et al.  Story grammar and reading time of story constituents , 1980 .

[16]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory , 1978 .

[17]  J. Mandler,et al.  Is There More than One Way to Recall a Story , 1979 .

[18]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  On Evaluating Story Grammars , 1980, Cogn. Sci..