Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot

This study investigated whether attitudes and emotions towards robots predicted acceptance of a healthcare robot in a retirement village population. Residents (n = 32) and staff (n = 21) at a retirement village interacted with a robot for approximately 30 minutes. Prior to meeting the robot, participants had their heart rate and blood pressure measured. The robot greeted the participants, assisted them in taking their vital signs, performed a hydration reminder, told a joke, played a music video, and asked some questions about falls and medication management. Participants were given two questionnaires; one before and one after interacting with the robot. Measures included in both questionnaires were the Robot Attitude Scale (RAS) and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). After using the robot, participants rated the overall quality of the robot interaction. Both residents and staff reported more favourable attitudes (p < .05) and decreases in negative affect (p < .05) towards the robot after meeting it, compared with before meeting it. Pre-interaction emotions and robot attitudes, combined with post-interaction changes in emotions and robot attitudes, were highly predictive of participants' robot evaluations (R = .88, p < .05). The results suggest both pre-interaction emotions and attitudes towards robots, as well as experience with the robot, are important areas to monitor and address in influencing acceptance of healthcare robots in retirement village residents and staff. The results support an active cognition model that incorporates a feedback loop based on re-evaluation after experience.

[1]  Libor Preucil,et al.  Next Generation Human-Robot Telematic Teams , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[2]  Kazuhiko Kawamura,et al.  Uncanny valley revisited , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[3]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[4]  Ben J. A. Krse,et al.  Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users , 2006 .

[5]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Robotics for surgery. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[6]  Amy Loutfi,et al.  An on-going evaluation of domestic robots , 2008, HRI 2008.

[7]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Psychological and Social Effects of One Year Robot Assisted Activity on Elderly People at a Health Service Facility for the Aged , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Human reactions to good and bad robots , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  Marilyn Kettering Murray,et al.  The Nursing Shortage: Past, Present, and Future , 2002, The Journal of nursing administration.

[12]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[15]  Maja J Matarić,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation , 2007 .

[16]  William A Banks,et al.  The effects of animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in an elderly population in long-term care facilities. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[17]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[18]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[19]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[20]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Towards a flexible platform for voice accent and expression selection on a Healthcare Robot , 2009, ALTA.

[21]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Retirement home staff and residents' preferences for healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[22]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[23]  Nora Super.  Who Will Be There to Care? The Growing Gap between Caregiver Supply and Demand , 2002 .

[24]  Paul Taylor,et al.  The architecture of the Festival speech synthesis system , 1998, SSW.

[25]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Daniel Ichbiah,et al.  Robots: From Science Fiction to Technological Revolution , 2005 .