Evaluating Environmental Arrangement as Setting Events: Review and Implications for Measurement

Environmental arrangement alters the physical, social, or programmatic aspects of classrooms to increase task engagement, facilitate prosocial behaviors, and reduce or prevent the challenging behaviors of children and youth. Research shows specific arrangements can affect student engagement and deportment, but this literature is not well integrated theoretically or empirically with other effective behavior change tactics. This article proposes that some environmental arrangements may serve as setting events for child behavior change. Setting events and environmental arrangement were defined and critically outlined. A total of 43 physical environmental arrangement articles were reviewed as to the specific type of arrangement and research methodology. Several methodological problems (e.g., lack of measurement or control of antecedents, consequences, or environmental arrangements, manipulation of more than one environmental arrangement) precluded conclusions about the setting event function of environmental arrangements. Suggestions for future research on setting events and environmental arrangements are proposed.

[1]  V. M. Nordquist,et al.  Effects of Environmental Reorganization in Classrooms for Children with Autism , 1991 .

[2]  F. C. Mace,et al.  Effects of community and center-based settings on the alertness of persons with profound mental retardation. , 1993, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  D M Baer,et al.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[4]  M. Conroy,et al.  Setting Events and Behavioral Disorders of Children and Youth , 1995 .

[5]  N. Lambert,et al.  Desk Arrangement Effects on Pupil Classroom Behavior. , 1985 .

[6]  R. Shores,et al.  A Comparison of Reactive and Nonreactive Toys on Severely Handicapped Children's Manipulative Play , 1984 .

[7]  F. L. Kohl,et al.  The Effects of Social and Isolate Toys on the Interactions and Play of Integrated and Nonintegrated Groups of Preschoolers. , 1984 .

[8]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Behavior analysis for lasting change , 1991 .

[9]  Saul Axelrod,et al.  Comparison of Two Common Classroom Seating Arrangements , 1979 .

[10]  W. H. Brown Effects of spatial density on 3- and 4-year-old children's socially directed behavior during freeplay: an investigation of a setting factor , 1987 .

[11]  W. H. Brown,et al.  The Usefulness of J. R. Kantor's Setting Event Concept for Research on Children's Social Behavior , 1986 .

[12]  B. Iwata,et al.  Establishing operations and reinforcement effects. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  M. Conroy,et al.  Setting Events and Challenging Behaviors in the Classroom: Incorporating Contextual Factors Into Effective Intervention Plans , 1994 .

[14]  S. Odom,et al.  ECOBEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS OF EARLY EDUCATION/SPECIALIZED CLASSROOM SETTINGS AND PEER SOCIAL INTERACTION , 1990 .

[15]  J. Birnbrauer External validity and experimental investigation of individual behaviour , 1981 .

[16]  Phyllis Speigel-McGill The Effects of Proximity on Socially Oriented Behaviors of Severely Multiply Handicapped Children. , 1984 .

[17]  R. D. Horner The effects of an environmental "enrichment" program on the behavior of institutionalized profoundly retarded children. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  L. Chandler,et al.  An analysis of the effects of multiple setting events on the social behavior of preschool children with special needs. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  D M Baer,et al.  Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. , 1987, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  Joy Gold Haralick,et al.  Integration of Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Preschoolers: An Analysis of Play Behavior and Social Interaction. , 1977 .

[21]  A. Pellegrini The Social Cognitive Ecology of Preschool Classrooms: Contextual Relations Revisited , 1984 .

[22]  Social and spatial density effects on spacing behaviour in preschool children. , 1970, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[23]  Sylvia S. Martin,et al.  Effects of Toys on the Social Behavior of Preschool Children in Integrated and Nonintegrated Groups , 1991 .

[24]  K. Wheldall,et al.  Rows versus Tables. II. The Effects of Two Classroom Seating Arrangements on Classroom Disruption Rate, On‐task Behaviour and Teacher Behaviour in Three Special School Classes , 1987 .

[25]  R. Shores,et al.  Effect of Cubicles in Educating Emotionally Disturbed Children , 1969, Exceptional children.

[26]  E. Carr,et al.  Reduction of severe behavior problems in the community using a multicomponent treatment approach. , 1993, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[27]  Martha B. Bronson,et al.  The effects of the classroom environment on the social and mastery behavior of preschool children with disabilities , 1993 .

[28]  T. Itkonen,et al.  Effects of setting events on the problem behavior of students with severe disabilities. , 1993, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[29]  D. Knapczyk Reducing Aggressive Behaviors in Special and Regular Class Settings by Training Alternative Social Responses , 1988 .

[30]  S. Leigland On “Setting Events” and Related Concepts , 1984, The Behavior analyst.

[31]  J. Michael Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  M. E. Thorpe,et al.  Features of integrated educational ecologies that predict social behavior among severely mentally retarded and nonretarded students. , 1986, American journal of mental deficiency.

[33]  J. Hendrickson,et al.  Relationship between Toy and Material Use and the Occurrence of Social Interactive Behaviors by Normally Developing Preschool Children. , 1981 .

[34]  M. Rosenbaum,et al.  The development and functional control of reading-comprehension behavior. , 1976, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[35]  R. Wahler,et al.  Setting events in applied behavior analysis: Toward a conceptual and methodological expansion. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[36]  V. M. Nordquist,et al.  Preventing Behavior Problems in Early Childhood Special Education Classrooms through Environmental Organization. , 1990 .

[37]  A. Repp,et al.  Naturalistic studies of institutionalized profoundly or severely mentally retarded persons: the relationship of density and behavior. , 1983, American journal of mental deficiency.

[38]  D. R. Thomas,et al.  Rules, praise, and ignoring: elements of elementary classroom control. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  S. Bijou Behavior analysis of child development , 1978 .

[40]  R. Winett,et al.  The effects of architectural change, individualized instruction, and group contigencies on the academic performance and social behavior of sixth graders ☆ , 1975 .

[41]  James K. McAfee Classroom Density and the Aggressive Behavior of Handicapped Children. , 1987 .

[42]  J. Kantor Interbehavioral psychology : a sample of scientific system construction , 1959 .

[43]  T. Risley,et al.  The effects of play materials on social play. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[44]  A. Kazdin The influence of behavior preceding a reinforced response on behavior change in the classroom. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[45]  C. Loo The Effects of Spatial Density on the Social Behavior of Children1 , 1972 .

[46]  A Rolider,et al.  An analysis of several variables influencing the efficacy of flash card instruction. , 1989, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[47]  T. G. Haring,et al.  Effects of contextual competence on social initiations. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[48]  Z. Stoneman,et al.  The association between play materials and social behavior in a mainstreamed preschool: A naturalistic investigation☆ , 1983 .

[49]  W. Vesey,et al.  Behavior-Setting Interactions of Autistic Children: A Behavioral Mapping Approach to Assessing Classroom Behaviors. , 1983 .