MRI of peripheral joints with a low-field dedicated system: A reliable and cost-effective alternative to high-field units?

In the age of health care cost containment new imaging technology has to meet diagnostic requirements as well as economic limitations. In the MR sector new dedicated systems promise reliable diagnostic information at considerably lower costs than whole-body imagers. Within the past 18 months we have examined 2200 patients with acute and chronic lesions of peripheral joints (knee, ankle, foot, elbow, wrist, hand) in a 0.2T dedicated MR system (ARTOSCAN, Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy). We report our experience with this system focusing on its special features, cost-effectiveness and on diagnostic accuracy of low-field MR studies of the knee in correlation with arthroscopy and in comparison with high-field whole-body imagers.

[1]  J. Carlson,et al.  Physics of thin-section MR imaging at low field strength. , 1989, Radiology.

[2]  S. Boden,et al.  MR scanning of the acutely injured knee: sensitive, but is it cost effective? , 1990, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  G. Buirski,et al.  M.R. imaging of the knee: a prospective trial using a low field strength magnet. , 1990, Australasian radiology.

[4]  L. Kaufman,et al.  MR imaging of the knee with a 0.064-T permanent magnet. , 1990, Radiology.

[5]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of meniscal and cruciate injuries of the knee. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  M. Friedman,et al.  Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  J. Raunest,et al.  The clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of meniscal disorders. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  J. Wright,et al.  Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy? , 1992, Radiology.

[9]  M. Barnett.  MR diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee: effect of field strength on efficacy. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  B J Hillman,et al.  New imaging technology and cost containment. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  W. Golder,et al.  [MR tomography of the extremities using the hemibody system ARTOSCAN. Initial experiences and expectations]. , 1994, Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik.

[12]  N. Powe.  Economic and cost-effectiveness investigations of radiologic practices. , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  P Gerhardt,et al.  [MRI of the knee joint: first results of a comparison of 0,2-T specialized system and 1,5-T high field strength magnet]. , 1995, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.