Service Coproduction with Information Stickiness and Incomplete Contracts: Implications for Consulting Services Design

Drawing from three theoretical bases—“information stickiness” from the knowledge management literature, “service coproduction” from the service operations management literature, and “incomplete contract theory” from the transaction cost economics literature—we discuss a theoretical framework and develop models to study the efficiency of the service coproduction process in a knowledge-intensive consulting environment. We apply, refine, and interpret these theories to determine how work should be allocated between the consultant and the client and the corresponding pricing under different contractual relationships that occur in this industry. We find that, with a pricing schedule that relates the fee adjustment to the self-service level and one party's ownership of the residual right to specify the workload allocation, the client underinvests her efforts in the service coproduction process, whereas the consultant overinvests his efforts, resulting in an inefficient process. In addition, to improve overall process efficiency, we show that the more productive party should own the residual right to respecify the self-service level when the final service need emerges. Our results, as well as interview data from experienced consultants, provide insights into the causes of inefficient service delivery processes and offer direction for achieving better efficiency through contract design and pricing schedules.

[1]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  The Customer Contact Approach to Services: Theoretical Bases and Practical Extensions , 1981, Oper. Res..

[2]  David A. Tansik,et al.  The Customer Contact Model for Organization Design , 1983 .

[3]  Peter K. Mills,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation Into the Influence of Customer-Firm Interface on Information Processing and Task Activities in Service Organizations , 1986 .

[4]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[5]  O. Hart,et al.  Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation , 1988 .

[6]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Chapter 3 Transaction cost economics , 1989 .

[7]  Tigineh Mersha,et al.  Enhancing the customer contact model , 1990 .

[8]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[9]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[10]  Deborah L. Kellogg,et al.  A framework for strategic service management , 1995 .

[11]  Oliver Hart,et al.  Firms, contracts, and financial structure , 1995 .

[12]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  Option Contracts and Renegotiation - A Solution to the Hold-Up Problem , 1995 .

[13]  U. Karmarkar,et al.  Service markets and competition , 1995 .

[14]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  Constructing an empirically derived measure for customer contact , 1995 .

[15]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[16]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[17]  C. Lengnick-Hall Customer Contributions to Quality: A Different View of the Customer-Oriented Firm , 1996 .

[18]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Customer contributions and roles in service delivery , 1997 .

[19]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[20]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[21]  Robin Fincham,et al.  The Consultant–Client Relationship: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Organizational Change , 1999 .

[22]  R. Kevin Wood,et al.  Retrieving and Transferring Embodied Data: Implications for the Management of Interdependence Within Organizations , 1999 .

[23]  M. Sarvary Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry , 1999 .

[24]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[25]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  A typology of de-coupling strategies in mixed services , 2000 .

[26]  Jan W. Rivkin Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[27]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[28]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Competing for Attention in Knowledge Markets: Electronic Document Dissemination in a Management Consulting Company , 2001 .

[29]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services , 2002 .

[30]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Customer Efficiency , 2002 .

[31]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[32]  J. Bateson,et al.  Are your customers good enough for your service business , 2002 .

[33]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Competition and Outsourcing with Scale Economies , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Marc N. Haines,et al.  Implementation Partner Involvement and Knowledge Transfer in the Context of ERP Implementations , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers , 2004 .

[37]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[38]  Sendil K. Ethiraj,et al.  Where Do Capabilities Come from and How Do They Matter? A Study in the Software Services Industry , 2005 .

[39]  William R. King,et al.  Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations , 2005, MIS Q..

[40]  Nora Jacobson,et al.  Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[41]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Firm Specificity of Individual Performance: Evidence from Cardiac Surgery , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[42]  K. Ferdows POM Forum: Transfer of Changing Production Know‐How , 2006 .

[43]  P. Drucker Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge , 1999, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[44]  R. David,et al.  WHEN FASHION IS FLEETING: TRANSITORY COLLECTIVE BELIEFS AND THE DYNAMICS OF TQM CONSULTING , 2006 .

[45]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Customer Efficiency, Channel Usage, and Firm Performance in Retail Banking , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[46]  Ragnhild Kvålshaugen,et al.  Choosing to Learn and Learning to Choose: Strategies for Client Co-Production and Knowledge Development , 2007 .

[47]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations , 2007 .