Next Generation Radiogenomics Sequencing for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multimodal Imaging and Machine Learning Approaches

Purpose Considerable progress has been made in the assessment and management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on mutation status in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS). At the same time, NSCLC management through KRAS and EGFR mutation profiling faces challenges. In the present work, we aimed to evaluate a comprehensive radiomics framework that enabled prediction of EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients based on radiomic features from low-dose computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced diagnostic quality CT (CTD), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging modalities and use of machine learning algorithms. Methods Our study involved NSCLC patients including 150 PET, low-dose CT, and CTD images. Radiomic features from original and preprocessed (including 64 bin discretizing, Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LOG), and Wavelet) images were extracted. Conventional clinically used standard uptake value (SUV) parameters and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were also obtained from PET images. Highly correlated features were pre-eliminated, and false discovery rate (FDR) correction was performed with the resulting q-values reported for univariate analysis. Six feature selection methods and 12 classifiers were then used for multivariate prediction of gene mutation status (provided by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) in patients. We performed 10-fold cross-validation for model tuning to improve robustness, and our developed models were assessed on an independent validation set with 68 patients (common in all three imaging modalities). The average area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was utilized for performance evaluation. Results The best predictive power for conventional PET parameters was achieved by SUV peak (AUC 0.69, p value = 0.0002) and MTV (AUC 0.55, p value = 0.0011) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Univariate analysis of extracted radiomics features improved AUC performance to 0.75 (q-value 0.003, Short-Run Emphasis feature of GLRLM from LOG preprocessed image of PET with sigma value 1.5) and 0.71 (q-value 0.00005, Large Dependence Low Gray-Level Emphasis feature of GLDM in LOG preprocessed image of CTD with sigma value 5) for EGFR and KRAS, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate machine learning-based AUC performances were significantly improved to 0.82 for EGFR (LOG preprocessed image of PET with sigma 3 with variance threshold (VT) feature selector and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) classifier (q-value = 4.86E-05) and 0.83 for KRAS (LOG preprocessed image of CT with sigma 3.5 with select model (SM) feature selector and SGD classifier (q-value = 2.81E−09). Conclusion Our work demonstrated that non-invasive and reliable radiomics analysis can be successfully used to predict EGFR and KRAS mutation status in NSCLC patients. We demonstrated that radiomic features extracted from different image-feature sets could be used for EGFR and KRAS mutation status prediction in NSCLC patients and showed improved predictive power relative to conventional image-derived metrics.

[1]  Olivier Gevaert,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data--methods and preliminary results. , 2012, Radiology.

[2]  Bahram Mofid,et al.  Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer , 2019, La radiologia medica.

[3]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer. , 2017, Cancer research.

[4]  Prateek Prasanna,et al.  Radiomics and radiogenomics in lung cancer: A review for the clinician. , 2018, Lung cancer.

[5]  Lei Xing,et al.  Radiomics and radiogenomics for precision radiotherapy , 2018, Journal of radiation research.

[6]  F. Siannis,et al.  Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  H. Abdollahi,et al.  Test-Retest Reproducibility and Robustness Analysis of Recurrent Glioblastoma MRI Radiomics Texture Features , 2017 .

[8]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2017, Cancer letters.

[9]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  Radiogenomic Mapping of Edema/Cellular Invasion MRI-Phenotypes in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Radiomics in Nuclear Medicine Applied to Radiation Therapy: Methods, Pitfalls, and Challenges. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  P. Lambin,et al.  Radiomic Machine-Learning Classifiers for Prognostic Biomarkers of Head and Neck Cancer , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[12]  M. Ostland,et al.  Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  P. Jänne,et al.  Outcomes by EGFR, KRAS and ALK Genotype After Combined Modality Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2016 .

[14]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. , 2020, Radiology.

[15]  Qiong Li,et al.  Radiomics signature: A potential and incremental predictor for EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients, comparison with CT morphology. , 2019, Lung cancer.

[16]  Paul J. Perry,et al.  A Review for the Clinician , 2002 .

[17]  Andriy Fedorov,et al.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. , 2017, Cancer research.

[18]  K. Miles,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival , 2012, European Radiology.

[19]  Bingbing Ni,et al.  Toward automatic prediction of EGFR mutation status in pulmonary adenocarcinoma with 3D deep learning , 2019, Cancer medicine.

[20]  Steffen Löck,et al.  Image biomarker standardisation initiative , 2016 .

[21]  S. Gambhir,et al.  A PET imaging approach for determining EGFR mutation status for improved lung cancer patient management , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[22]  S. Toyooka,et al.  Detection of EGFR Gene Mutation in Lung Cancer by Mutant-Enriched Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  L. Crinò,et al.  Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase Catalytic Alpha and KRAS Mutations are Important Predictors of Resistance to Therapy with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[24]  Steffen Löck,et al.  A comparative study of machine learning methods for time-to-event survival data for radiomics risk modelling , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future? , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Wengui Xu,et al.  Predictive Power of a Radiomic Signature Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT Images for EGFR Mutational Status in NSCLC , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[27]  H. Abdollahi,et al.  Medical Imaging Technologists in Radiomics Era: An Alice in Wonderland Problem , 2019, Iranian journal of public health.

[28]  M. Shiran,et al.  Gold nanoparticle‐induced sonosensitization enhances the antitumor activity of ultrasound in colon tumor‐bearing mice , 2018, Medical physics.

[29]  P. Lambin,et al.  Genomics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Association between CT-based imaging features and EGFR and K-RAS mutations in 122 patients-An external validation. , 2019, European journal of radiology.

[30]  P. Lambin,et al.  Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Timothy Solberg,et al.  Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers , 2018, Medical physics.

[32]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  3D Slicer , 2012, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[33]  M. Socinski,et al.  Personalized medicine in non-small-cell lung cancer: is KRAS a useful marker in selecting patients for epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy? , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  D. Dong,et al.  Quantitative Biomarkers for Prediction of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, Translational oncology.

[35]  Ji-Hong Hong,et al.  Diffusion radiomics analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity in a murine prostate cancer model following radiotherapy: Pixelwise correlation with histology , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Kevin H. Leung,et al.  Direct attenuation correction of brain PET images using only emission data via a deep convolutional encoder-decoder (Deep-DAC) , 2019, European Radiology.

[37]  D. Dong,et al.  Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma on computed tomography image using deep learning , 2019, European Respiratory Journal.

[38]  Osman Ratib,et al.  OsiriX: An Open-Source Software for Navigating in Multidimensional DICOM Images , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[39]  Olivier Gevaert,et al.  A radiogenomic dataset of non-small cell lung cancer , 2018, Scientific Data.

[40]  Marco Aiello,et al.  Radiogenomic Analysis of Oncological Data: A Technical Survey , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[41]  Isaac Shiri,et al.  Cochlea CT radiomics predicts chemoradiotherapy induced sensorineural hearing loss in head and neck cancer patients: A machine learning and multi-variable modelling study. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[42]  H. Hricak,et al.  Background, current role, and potential applications of radiogenomics , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[43]  W. Pao,et al.  KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[44]  P. Lambin,et al.  Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[45]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Robustness of Radiomic Features in [11C]Choline and [18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Impact of Segmentation and Discretization , 2016, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[46]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies , 2017, European Radiology.

[47]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[48]  H. Aerts Semantics Features : Phenotype Quantification by a Radiologist ’ s Expert Eye , 2016 .

[49]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Machine Learning Methods for Optimal Radiomics-Based Differentiation Between Recurrence and Inflammation: Application to Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Post-therapy PET/CT Images , 2019, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[50]  Hassan Maleki,et al.  PET/CT Radiomic Sequencer for Prediction of EGFR and KRAS Mutation Status in NSCLC Patients , 2018, 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC).

[51]  Richard Simon,et al.  Implementing personalized cancer genomics in clinical trials , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[52]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[53]  Isaac Shiri,et al.  A thermo‐responsive alginate nanogel platform co‐loaded with gold nanoparticles and cisplatin for combined cancer chemo‐photothermal therapy , 2019, Pharmacological research.

[54]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[55]  Y. Liu,et al.  Radiomic Features Are Associated With EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinomas. , 2016, Clinical lung cancer.

[56]  H. Abdollahi,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging radiomic feature analysis of radiation-induced femoral head changes in prostate cancer radiotherapy , 2019, Journal of cancer research and therapeutics.

[57]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[58]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  TCIA: An information resource to enable open science , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[59]  Jacob G. Scott,et al.  Machine Learning and Radiogenomics: Lessons Learned and Future Directions , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[60]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[61]  H. P. Oliveira,et al.  Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[62]  H. Abdollahi,et al.  Noninvasive O6 Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Status Prediction in Glioblastoma Multiforme Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features: Univariate and Multivariate Radiogenomics Analysis , 2019 .