An enhanced data-analytic framework for integrating risk management and performance management

Abstract There is increasing interest for agencies and industries to develop risk management processes for a wide variety of applications. Traditional risk management processes are motivated by controlling risk and avoiding losses. In contrast, other organizational processes focus on managing performance and value generation. In this paper we argue that risk management also adds an important contribution to these processes. However, this requires “proper” risk management extending beyond narrow safety oriented perspectives built on quantitative risk analysis and tolerability/acceptance criteria. There is need for a broad risk-performance framework with uncertainty being a main component of risk, and where knowledge and surprises are adequately reflected. In the paper we present and discuss such a framework. The framework is developed on the basis of an analysis of combinations of different risk management and performance management practices/policies. We show how the risk and performance management processes can be improved by proper risk conceptualization and a holistic thinking on how to develop and use goals in the organization, how to balance different concerns, and consider the need for agility – “sensitivity to operations”, as well as how to give weight to vulnerabilities, resilience, and antifragility.

[1]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk management and governance , 2019, The Science of Risk Analysis.

[3]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[4]  Matthew Leitch,et al.  ISO 31000:2009—The New International Standard on Risk Management , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Nikolay Dentchev,et al.  Corporate Social Performance as a Business Strategy , 2004 .

[6]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[7]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  People and Performance: The Best of Peter Drucker on Management , 1977 .

[8]  A. Hopkins Issues in safety science , 2014 .

[9]  Gary Cokins The Future: Enterprise Risk-Based Performance Management , 2012 .

[10]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[11]  Terje Aven,et al.  A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  T. Aven The Concept of Antifragility and its Implications for the Practice of Risk Analysis , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Jean-Christophe Le Coze,et al.  Outlines of a sensitising model for industrial safety assessment , 2013 .

[14]  N. Taleb Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder , 2012 .

[15]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  C. Martin 2015 , 2015, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[17]  A. Neely,et al.  A literature review and research agenda , 1995 .