Human Daily Activity Recognition With Sparse Representation Using Wearable Sensors

Human daily activity recognition using mobile personal sensing technology plays a central role in the field of pervasive healthcare. One major challenge lies in the inherent complexity of human body movements and the variety of styles when people perform a certain activity. To tackle this problem, in this paper, we present a novel human activity recognition framework based on recently developed compressed sensing and sparse representation theory using wearable inertial sensors. Our approach represents human activity signals as a sparse linear combination of activity signals from all activity classes in the training set. The class membership of the activity signal is determined by solving a l1 minimization problem. We experimentally validate the effectiveness of our sparse representation-based approach by recognizing nine most common human daily activities performed by 14 subjects. Our approach achieves a maximum recognition rate of 96.1%, which beats conventional methods based on nearest neighbor, naive Bayes, and support vector machine by as much as 6.7%. Furthermore, we demonstrate that by using random projection, the task of looking for “optimal features” to achieve the best activity recognition performance is less important within our framework.

[1]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[2]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Secure and Robust Iris Recognition Using Random Projections and Sparse Representations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Mi Zhang,et al.  Motion primitive-based human activity recognition using a bag-of-features approach , 2012, IHI '12.

[4]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  A Triaxial Accelerometer-Based Physical-Activity Recognition via Augmented-Signal Features and a Hierarchical Recognizer , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[5]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Gestures are strings: efficient online gesture spotting and classification using string matching , 2007, BODYNETS.

[7]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Discriminative learned dictionaries for local image analysis , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Mi Zhang,et al.  Manifold Learning and Recognition of Human Activity Using Body-Area Sensors , 2011, 2011 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications and Workshops.

[9]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A Hybrid Discriminative/Generative Approach for Modeling Human Activities , 2005, IJCAI.

[10]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Random projection in dimensionality reduction: applications to image and text data , 2001, KDD '01.

[11]  Mohammad H. Mahoor,et al.  Facial action unit recognition with sparse representation , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[12]  Majid Sarrafzadeh,et al.  Co-recognition of Human Activity and Sensor Location via Compressed Sensing in Wearable Body Sensor Networks , 2012, 2012 Ninth International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks.

[13]  Timm Faulwasser,et al.  Towards pervasive computing in health care – A literature review , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[14]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[15]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[16]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  Eraldo Ribeiro,et al.  Human Motion Recognition Using Isomap and Dynamic Time Warping , 2007, Workshop on Human Motion.

[18]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data , 2005, AAAI.

[20]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Analyzing features for activity recognition , 2005, sOc-EUSAI '05.

[21]  Mi Zhang,et al.  A feature selection-based framework for human activity recognition using wearable multimodal sensors , 2011, BODYNETS.

[22]  Bert Cranen,et al.  Using sparse representations for missing data imputation in noise robust speech recognition , 2008, 2008 16th European Signal Processing Conference.

[23]  Michael Elad,et al.  Applications of Sparse Representation and Compressive Sensing , 2010, Proc. IEEE.

[24]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Recognizing Workshop Activity Using Body Worn Microphones and Accelerometers , 2004, Pervasive.

[25]  V. Kshirsagar,et al.  Face recognition using Eigenfaces , 2011, 2011 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development.

[26]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive imaging for video representation and coding , 2006 .

[27]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[28]  James A. Landay,et al.  The Mobile Sensing Platform: An Embedded Activity Recognition System , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.