On the Theoretical Justification of the Organisational Size Construct in Information Systems Research

A number of disciplines pursue research into organisations. This organisational research serves to improve knowledge regarding the interaction, behaviour and direction of humans and groups. Because Information Systems (IS) has drawn upon several of these disciplines for foundation, a number of research approaches exist for examining organisations within the IS domain. Organisational size, as a frequent research variable in the IS literature, has received considerable application but little critical examination. This paper examines the content and construct validity of the organisational size construct. Research papers published in six leading IS journals over an eleven year period were examined to determine the factors supporting the organisational size construct. The results show a large number of factors in scholarly use, the three most common factors being Organisational Resources, Organisational Levels and Economies of Scale. Additionally, many studies offer little or no supportive analysis or justification for their use of organisational size. The findings raise a number of issues that are out of the scope of this study: these issues merit further research.

[1]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  Integration in Electronic Exchange Environments , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  System Life Expectancy and the Maintenance Effort: Exploring Their Equilibration , 2000, MIS Q..

[3]  Sherry D. Ryan,et al.  Considering Social Subsystem Costs and Benefits in Information Technology Investment Decisions: A View from the Field on Anticipated Payoffs , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Qualitative Data Management and Analysis , 1999 .

[5]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Measurement Quality Issues in Dyadic Models of Relationships , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[6]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Construct Validity and Background Data: Issues, Abuses, and Future Directions , 1999 .

[7]  Raymond McLeod,et al.  Expert, Linear Models, and Nonlinear Models of Expert Decision Making in Bankruptcy Prediction: A Lens Model Analysis , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Gerald V. Post,et al.  A Structural Equation Evaluation of CASE Tools Attributes , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  L. Richard Ye,et al.  Information technology and firm performance: Linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[11]  N. Kanopoulos,et al.  A metric for estimating the fault-secure behavior of digital circuits , 1998 .

[12]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Clockspeed and Informational Response: Evidence from the Information Technology Industry , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  J. Youngner The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Can Humans Detect Errors in Data? Impact of Base Rates, Incentives, and Goals , 1997, MIS Q..

[15]  Sabyasachi Mitra,et al.  Analyzing Cost-Effectiveness of Organizations: The Impact of Information Technology Spending , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  Impact of Competitive Strategy and Information Technology Maturity on Firms' Strategic Response to Globalization , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  William R. King Achieving Global Strategic Advantage , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[18]  Gary Klein,et al.  Mode and gender effects on survey data quality , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[20]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[21]  Hannu Kivijärvi,et al.  Investment in information systems and the financial performance of the firm , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[22]  James E. Short,et al.  An Examination of Information Technology's Impact on the Value of Information and Expertise: Implications for Organizational Change , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  William R. King,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[25]  David Harlan Wood,et al.  Discovering Shared Interests Among People Using Graph Analysis , 1993 .

[26]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring technology incorporation/infusion , 1992 .

[27]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[28]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Career Orientations of MIS Employees: An Empirical Analysis , 1991, MIS Q..

[29]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Context and Information Systems Success: A Contingency Approach , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Discovering and Disciplining Computer Abuse in Organizations: A Field Study , 1990, MIS Q..

[31]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources , 1989, MIS Q..

[32]  Peter Weill,et al.  An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Ali R. Montazemi,et al.  Factors Affecting Information Satisfaction in the Context of the Small Business Environment , 1988, MIS Q..

[34]  Clive Donald Wrigley A model and method for measuring information system size , 1988 .

[35]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[36]  James L. Ginter,et al.  Managers' conservatism and corporate performance , 1985 .

[37]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .