Organizing for Digital Infrastructure Innovation: The Interplay of Initiated and Sustained Attention

This research takes an attention-based view of organizing to investigate digital infrastructure innovation. In our qualitative study of nine computationally-intensive research centers, we find that there appears to be a distinction between modes of attention: initiation and sustainment. Further, continual organizational innovation in digital infrastructure appears to require different skills, goals, and values and tends to involve different people. We conclude with a process view implied by this research whereby those who innovate during the initiation of attention have direct inducements in the domain the digital infrastructure supports. Innovators engaged in sustained attention, on the other hand, tend to have direct inducements in advancing high-performance computing.

[1]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[4]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[5]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[6]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating Tensions in Development , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  K. Baker,et al.  Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment , 2009 .

[8]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change , 1959 .

[9]  Ilkka Tuomi,et al.  Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet , 2002 .

[10]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Infrastructures : The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010 .

[13]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[14]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Binate Diversity and IT at the Rolling Edge of Design Networks , 2007, ICIS.

[15]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[16]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[17]  M. Kenney.  Understanding silicon valley : the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region , 2000 .

[18]  W. Ocasio.  TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[19]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[20]  J. Law.  TECHNOLOGY AND HETEROGENEOUS ENGINEERING: THE CASE OF PORTUGUESE EXPANSION , 2018, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES.

[21]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[22]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[23]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[24]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[25]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Perspective - Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School's Past, Present, and Reconstructing for the Future , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Thomas P. Hughes,et al.  The Electrification of America: The System Builders , 2023 .

[28]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[29]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Not All Events are Attended Equally: Toward a Middle-Range Theory of Industry Attention to External Events , 2001 .

[30]  N. Mackintosh.  A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[31]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[32]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Competing for Attention in Knowledge Markets: Electronic Document Dissemination in a Management Consulting Company , 2001 .

[33]  Govindan Parayil,et al.  Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation and Technological Change , 1991, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..